Or maybe you have your own bias which allows you to be more receptive and have the film hit harder than most?
There is no manufactured reasoning.
If anything, there has been very light pushback against this - especially considering the outrage machine against other recent films
The film by all accounts does a good job distancing itself from Q and the potential preachiness
However, the film has also given the face of the movie a giant microphone and he's leaned in to fully use it for Q
I personally find Q to not only be distasteful, but also dangerous.
It's not a far line that when someone who buys into Q and into the elements about satanists elites running a global child sex trafficking ring to harvest the blood and organs for adrenochrome ends up being the lead actor in a movie about child sex trafficking that there is s chance of some QAnon sneaking in
To the films credit, that does not seem to be the case
Again though, it does give a microphone to the lead actor to speak on the topic and push Q conspiracies, which are dangerous
Does anyone find any of this stuff sane?!?
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
There is an important conversation to be had
That conversation has zero to do with an adrenochrome thirsty cabal and the more you associate that, the less credible your conversation becomes
It's also no coincidence people like wayward fan are trying to take a victory lap that it outperformed Indiana Jones - even if it takes a lot of stretching too make that claim. It also beat Spidey that day and a bunch of other movies...... So why single out Indy?
He also spots the common refrain that Hollywood and the elites wanted to suppress and kill this movie because it exposes them
We're one post about Chris Cornell and others being silenced from the bingo card.........
www.rollingstone.com
