SF picks??????

[Cbus cardsfan]

They'll likely get graded high because, for some reason, every analsyt loves them but i like their picks for the Cards sake. Do they even have a game plan on offense? The 2nd half of last year they hardly used Gore and went with Alex Smith throwing 40 times a game for 95 yards. Now, they draft 2 OL to try and become a smash mouth team. It looks like they have no clue of what type of offenive team they want to be.

As for the players, Davis is a huge question mark. If his motivation is being questioned at the college level, how motivated is he going to be when he already has millions in the bank? I can see him becoming a Wendell Bryant type pick. Iupati, i like, but he's taking a huge step up in competition from whoever Idaho plays to the NFL. It's easy to push around Big Sky(if that's their conference) players at 6'5 330 pounds. It's a little different at the NFL level when the players are as big as he is and alot more athletic.

I was worried SF wold take Dez Bryant and team him with Crabtree to give them a pretty nice young recieving corp. If i was SF, I would have taken Bryant and Clausen. Get some offense to go with a pretty decent defense. They could get an OT in round 2 that will be every bit as good at Davis. I still think Charles Brown will turn out to be the best OT down the road.

 

[Mulli]

They'll likely get graded high because, for some reason, every analsyt loves them but i like their picks for the Cards sake. Do they even have a game plan on offense? The 2nd half of last year they hardly used Gore and went with Alex Smith throwing 40 times a game for 95 yards. Now, they draft 2 OL to try and become a smash mouth team. It looks like they have no clue of what type of offenive team they want to be.

As for the players, Davis is a huge question mark. If his motivation is being questioned at the college level, how motivated is he going to be when he already has millions in the bank? I can see him becoming a Wendell Bryant type pick. Iupati, i like, but he's taking a huge step up in competition from whoever Idaho plays to the NFL. It's easy to push around Big Sky(if that's their conference) players at 6'5 330 pounds. It's a little different at the NFL level when the players are as big as he is and alot more athletic.

I was worried SF wold take Dez Bryant and team him with Crabtree to give them a pretty nice young recieving corp. If i was SF, I would have taken Bryant and Clausen. Get some offense to go with a pretty decent defense. They could get an OT in round 2 that will be every bit as good at Davis. I still think Charles Brown will turn out to be the best OT down the road.

I agree. I am also not concerned about the players the Seahawks added. SEA could have used Bryant as well.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

Huh? The worst part of their team BY FAR is their offensive line and they got 2 of them to come in and start Game 1. SF should be loving the draft right now. They still have a chance to move up and get Claussen/McCoy too.

 

[Mulli]

Huh? The worst part of their team BY FAR is their offensive line and they got 2 of them to come in and start Game 1. SF should be loving the draft right now. They still have a chance to move up and get Claussen/McCoy too.

The OL was not worse BY FAR than the receivers after Crabtree and the QB position.


Actually I think the coaching staff is the weakest link.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

The OL was not worse BY FAR than the receivers after Crabtree and the QB position.


Actually I think the coaching staff is the weakest link.

No way, they upgraded their WR with Crabtree and Davis came into his own last year as well. I have a couple 49er fans for friends and they all wanted offensive line help. They can still upgrade QB early too.

Coaching staff is another matter....

 

[Mulli]

No way, they upgraded their WR with Crabtree and Davis came into his own last year as well. I have a couple 49er fans for friends and they all wanted offensive line help. They can still upgrade QB early too.

Coaching staff is another matter....

I said AFTER Crabtree!!!!!! Just for that I am bumping our Clausen discussion.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

I said AFTER Crabtree!!!!!! Just for that I am bumping our Clausen discussion.

The Colts have the worst QB situation after Peyton Manning.

Just for that....... I can't think of nothing to bump.... oh well.

 

[Cbus cardsfan]

Actually I think the coaching staff is the weakest link.

agree 100%.

 

[Mulli]

The Colts have the worst QB situation after Peyton Manning.

Just for that....... I can't think of nothing to bump.... oh well.

Crabtree is to Peyton like Matt Schaub is to Larry Fitzgerald.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

Crabtree is to Peyton like Matt Schaub is to Larry Fitzgerald.

It's just pointing out that one person can make a WR core.

Houston's core sucks without Andre Johnson.

 

[Mulli]

It's just pointing out that one person can make a WR core.

Houston's core sucks without Andre Johnson.

That is not what we are talking about. But Houston is an 8-8 team as well. If you and SF want to them to stay 8-8, I agree with you.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

That is not what we are talking about. But Houston is an 8-8 team as well. If you and SF want to them to stay 8-8, I agree with you.

We are talking about their team weaknesses. Offensive line, other than LT QB, S, WR in that order.

 

[Mulli]

We are talking about their team weaknesses. Offensive line, other than LT QB, S, WR in that order.

But Houston is an 8-8 team as well. If you and SF want to them to stay 8-8, I agree with you.

 

[Brighteyes]

Crabtree is to Peyton like Matt Schaub is to Larry Fitzgerald.

I almost spit coffee on my keyboard.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

But Houston is an 8-8 team as well. If you and SF want to them to stay 8-8, I agree with you.

What is your point?

 

[Mulli]

What is your point?

That if you have no problem with SF keeping a WR corps that results in them being 8-8, like Houston, more power to you.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

That if you have no problem with SF keeping a WR corps that results in them being 8-8, like Houston, more power to you.

We were a 6 win team with Boldin and Fitzgerald at one point. Did we need to change the WR core then too?

 

[Mulli]

We were a 6 win team with Boldin and Fitzgerald at one point. Did we need to change the WR core then too?

You lost me.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

Delusional.

Mods.... oh wait. I am one.

 

[Mulli]

Mods.... oh wait. I am one.

Please do not ban me for deleting it. It was my medical opinion.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

You lost me.

You said that they needed to upgrade their WR core because they were only 8-8. I said we had Boldin and Fitz and were a 6 win team. Did we need to upgrade our WR core because we only won 6 games?

 

[Mulli]

You said that they needed to upgrade their WR core because they were only 8-8. I said we had Boldin and Fitz and were a 6 win team. Did we need to upgrade our WR core because we only one 6 games?

I said they were 8-8 because of their WR corps made their offense stoppable. The Cards were not 6-10 because of their WR corps.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

I said they were 8-8 because of their WR corps made their offense stoppable. The Cards were not 6-10 because of their WR corps.

I think they were 8-8 more because they went away from Gore, not necessarily because they went to their WR's if that makes sense.

 

[Mulli]

I think they were 8-8 more because they went away from Gore, not necessarily because they went to their WR's if that makes sense.

Interesting

 

[dreamcastrocks]

Interesting

at least I'm not delusional anymore..... I think.