Reasonable extension for Dumpster Dan?

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,384
Reaction score
16,616
Location
The Giant Toaster
For a solid NT coming off his rookie contract? He will be 28 years old next season...

Right now according to Overthecap.com the Cards are projected to be about 6m over the salary cap (but that doesn't include cap carryover from this season and DOES include Palmer's 10m, so subtract that).

Dumpster Dan is a big part of our run D but having the money for a QB is simply more important. Alameda Ta'amu could also be a cheap backup plan.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
84,403
Reaction score
33,055
I think we should make him the highest paid player in the NFL at his position, apparently that's how you get a guy to play better.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,664
Location
CA
This is the most reasonable extension for Dan:
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 320

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,113
Reaction score
20,798
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Extend him, for sure. Ask the Steelers how well they've done in the middle of the line in the 3-4 in the post-Hampton era. You do NOT let a top NT go when you're playing the 3-4.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,932
Reaction score
13,635
He's maybe my favorite Cardinal just quietly does his job game in game out. He's a huge reason why our run defense is so good he just never gets pushed back.

We def need him so whatever it takes
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
I'm not convinced he's that solid. Good lateral movement (great lateral movement actually) but I don't see him push Centers back and he's never double teamed. I'm not against extending him, don't get me wrong, I'm not sure we can improve on him, but I'm still not convinced he's anything other than average.

(That being said, his ability to shed dudes and move laterally is pretty excellent, he just doesn't have the push I'd like)
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,537
Reaction score
4,949
Location
Gilbert
Extend him, for sure. Ask the Steelers how well they've done in the middle of the line in the 3-4 in the post-Hampton era. You do NOT let a top NT go when you're playing the 3-4.

Not to sound ignorant, inevitably that's how this will come off.. But is he REALLY a top NT in this league?
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,932
Reaction score
13,635
I'm not convinced he's that solid. Good lateral movement (great lateral movement actually) but I don't see him push Centers back and he's never double teamed. I'm not against extending him, don't get me wrong, I'm not sure we can improve on him, but I'm still not convinced he's anything other than average.

(That being said, his ability to shed dudes and move laterally is pretty excellent, he just doesn't have the push I'd like)

So just who is not average according to you
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
So just who is not average according to you

That's a weird question, I'm not sure what you're asking me? I'm just saying he's not above average, to me he's average. I've seen him make some really good plays shedding blocks and going sideline to sideline (moreso last year). But I've never seen him get push. Never seen him shed his man and disrupt the backfield. When's the last time he wow'd you?

(Apologies, I am slow. To your question: I guess Wilfork, Ratliff, Kyle Williams. There are more, a lot more that are better than Dan Williams)

What makes Dan Williams special? What makes him above average? I think he's average at best. There were games he got few snaps. I even think Taamau, however you spell that, got more push than him.
 
Last edited:

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,461
Reaction score
16,602
Location
San Antonio, Texas
He is one of the main reasons this defense is great when healthy, and is surviving now. He is very very important and the route of the cheap backup plan is a flawed one. What makes him so special is that the offense cannot get a push against us and why we can play the run so well in a 3-4... it is simple, he is the foundation of the front DL and does not get the credit he deserves as a NT in the 3-4
 

Snakester

Draft Man
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
5,353
Reaction score
1,982
Location
North Carolina
Yea he's not great but he is pretty solid. We don't have to break the bank to keep him but I think a five year 25 million dollar contract would keep him here. If he wants ten mil a year then let him walk. Ta'amu when healthy is solid as well. I would like to keep him also.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,316
Reaction score
3,969
Location
Monroe NC
I am going to call him high average. I get where Darkside is coming from. Dumpster can hold his ground and has great lateral movement however he lacks any type of good penetration. This makes him a high average player. The best NTs can do all three.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,113
Reaction score
20,798
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
He is one of the main reasons this defense is great when healthy, and is surviving now. He is very very important and the route of the cheap backup plan is a flawed one. What makes him so special is that the offense cannot get a push against us and why we can play the run so well in a 3-4... it is simple, he is the foundation of the front DL and does not get the credit he deserves as a NT in the 3-4

Winner winner, chicken dinner. We'd be idiots to let him walk.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,822
Reaction score
26,561
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Winner winner, chicken dinner. We'd be idiots to let him walk.

Who's saying that we're going to "let him walk"? I don't hear anyone advocating that. The question in the OP is what would be a "reasonable extension" for him?

If Larry Fitzgerald and Carson Palmer both stay on the roster in 2015, it's going to be virtually impossible to keep Dan Williams. Palmer could command in excess of $12M in 2015 money alone, and accounting tricks just push that cost into the future, when he likely wouldn't be on the roster. Even with a steep pay cut, Fitz would do significant damage to our cap.

I think that $5M per season would be fair for a guy who plays at a high level, but also a guy who's had some problems staying healthy, fit, and is only on the field for 30-40% of the defensive plays.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
That's a weird question, I'm not sure what you're asking me? I'm just saying he's not above average, to me he's average. I've seen him make some really good plays shedding blocks and going sideline to sideline (moreso last year). But I've never seen him get push. Never seen him shed his man and disrupt the backfield. When's the last time he wow'd you?

(Apologies, I am slow. To your question: I guess Wilfork, Ratliff, Kyle Williams. There are more, a lot more that are better than Dan Williams)

What makes Dan Williams special? What makes him above average? I think he's average at best. There were games he got few snaps. I even think Taamau, however you spell that, got more push than him.

The Ratliff of Dallas, some 4 seasons ago was superior, but certainly not the 33 year old in Chicago. IMO
 

nationsrj

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Posts
174
Reaction score
19
Location
Peoria AZ
I believe Dan is Average Starter

From ProFootballFocus
Dan is an average starter at his position.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,756
Reaction score
35,113
Location
Colorado
With regards to usage, age, and position, I am offering him between 3 and 3.5 mil for 2 or 3 years tops. It is a salary cap league, and he just doesn't play enough snaps or is enough of a pass rush threat to justify more than that IMO. Similar situation to Shaughnessy IMO. If Williams wants to take a different deal somewhere else, the Cards can role with Ta'amu and Gaston, or bring in another body.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
With all the pieces we lost up front, the Cards are still Top 3 in Run Defense. To me, that doesn't happen if Dumpster Dan isn't on the field.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
33,805
Reaction score
18,726
Location
South Bay
With regards to usage, age, and position, I am offering him between 3 and 3.5 mil for 2 or 3 years tops. It is a salary cap league, and he just doesn't play enough snaps or is enough of a pass rush threat to justify more than that IMO. Similar situation to Shaughnessy IMO. If Williams wants to take a different deal somewhere else, the Cards can role with Ta'amu and Gaston, or bring in another body.


I vacillate on the Dan Williams issue. I figured Ta'amu could replace him, but he's shown little this year.

Williams is good, but certainly replaceable. I'd offer about the same, but think someone's gonna give him 5 years 25 mil on the open market.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,756
Reaction score
35,113
Location
Colorado
Dan Williams usage to date 31.7% of defensive snaps. The Ghost has played 30.8%. (violated my own rule but it is regards to Dan Williams so I will allow it)
 
Last edited:

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
84,403
Reaction score
33,055
Who's saying that we're going to "let him walk"? I don't hear anyone advocating that. The question in the OP is what would be a "reasonable extension" for him?

If Larry Fitzgerald and Carson Palmer both stay on the roster in 2015, it's going to be virtually impossible to keep Dan Williams. Palmer could command in excess of $12M in 2015 money alone, and accounting tricks just push that cost into the future, when he likely wouldn't be on the roster. Even with a steep pay cut, Fitz would do significant damage to our cap.

I think that $5M per season would be fair for a guy who plays at a high level, but also a guy who's had some problems staying healthy, fit, and is only on the field for 30-40% of the defensive plays.

That sounds about right, I keep forgetting the issue we have with Fitz and his salary. Tough situation you'd like him to retire a Card but you almost wish the NFL had a amnesty clause like the NBA to get out from under such a contract too.

I agree with others it's not coincidence the run defense is still good, Dan has a lot to do with that, but you have to be careful you don't want to overpay for a guy who plays less than half the snaps.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
536,921
Posts
5,261,913
Members
6,276
Latest member
Beagleperson
Top