Jeff Blake is 32 years old. He could have 5 to 7 playing years left in him. Why have I seen so many threads saying he's an interim QB and will only be here for the next year or two until the Cards "Franchise QB" is groomed and ready to take his place. Suppose he has a good to great year this season, will we still consider him to be an "interim" QB?
<p>I look at the Superbowl champs and see that their QB, Brad Johnson is 35 and the runner-up Superbowl participants and see that their QB, Rich Gannon is 37. I don't hear any of their fans clamoring for a QB change. <p>What I'm trying to say is that maybe the Cards have their "franchise QB" already and he's going to be the starter for the next 5 to 7 years. He's certainly motivated enough and he's used to not having a great WR corps (the only area of the offense that I think we might be weak at).<p>Now I know that some of you will say that he is not good enough to be a full time starter and you want him replaced because you think there are a lot of other QB's that are better. That could very well be and he might fall flat on his face this coming season, but I think we owe it to him and the rest of his team mates to consider him the starter until he loses the job due to failing abilities. <p>Please note that this is my opinion and is not meant to start a QB argument. I'm just thinking out loud and had some time on my hands on a Sunday evening. Sure beats the hell out of watching reruns on TV
<p>I look at the Superbowl champs and see that their QB, Brad Johnson is 35 and the runner-up Superbowl participants and see that their QB, Rich Gannon is 37. I don't hear any of their fans clamoring for a QB change. <p>What I'm trying to say is that maybe the Cards have their "franchise QB" already and he's going to be the starter for the next 5 to 7 years. He's certainly motivated enough and he's used to not having a great WR corps (the only area of the offense that I think we might be weak at).<p>Now I know that some of you will say that he is not good enough to be a full time starter and you want him replaced because you think there are a lot of other QB's that are better. That could very well be and he might fall flat on his face this coming season, but I think we owe it to him and the rest of his team mates to consider him the starter until he loses the job due to failing abilities. <p>Please note that this is my opinion and is not meant to start a QB argument. I'm just thinking out loud and had some time on my hands on a Sunday evening. Sure beats the hell out of watching reruns on TV