Let me first say that an uncapped year would not be the death of football and the players do not want the uncapped year. Teams will not be able to spend willy nilly and the haves compared to the have nots is not that wide of a margin. I can say all of that with certainty because “uncapped” means way more rules. The biggest rules being –
1. To stop the haves from loading up and talent and spending willy nilly, the top 8 teams prior to free agency cannot sign a free agent unless they lose one first.
2. The top players will be hindered in even getting these uncapped dollars because teams now have the right to franchise not one but two players now.
3. The top young players will be hindered in even making these uncapped dollars because they cant become free agents until they put in 6 years of service. If you don’t have six years of service you will be a restricted free agent and only make 2 mill. Example, last year was an uncapped year we could have just slapped a RFA tender of 2 mill on Dansby instead of the 8+ mill franchise tag.
4. The amount of money in free agency will dwindle because teams no longer have to spend a certain amount of money on free agents. Because of the Cap teams are forced to spend money, with no cap they are no longer forced to do as much. For example – Lets say teams will be forced to spend at least 100 Mill in cap dollars this year, next year in an uncapped year that same team can cut their payroll down to 50 mill if they wanted to. And in this uncertain economic time you better believe the poorer of the teams in the league will do just that.
So in summary, this uncapped year will not be a free for all for the richer of the teams and the players will actually have more restrictions then ever to make money, far fewer opportunities and far less overall money on the market. Lets not even mention that the Owners will call for a lockout in 2011 if there isn’t a new CBA in place.