hcsilla
ASFN Lifer
HOU/POR/PHO/UTA blockbuster follow-up trade proposal
HOU trade
their 6.9 mil trade exception from the Rice trade
future 2nd round pick
HOU get
Jahidi White
their 2004 lotto protected 1st from UTA
NYK's future pick from PHO
3 mil. cash from PHO
PHO trade
Antonio McDyess
Jahidi White
CLE's future 1st
NYK's future 1st
3 mil. cash
PHO get
Greg Ostertag
POR trade
Rasheed Wallace
POR get
Antonio McDyess
Keon Clark
CLE's future 1st
HOU's future 2nd
UTA trade
Greg Ostertag
Keon Clark
HOU's 2004 lotto protected 1st
UTA get
Rasheed Wallace
Why for HOU?
They get a banger to backup Ming and two 1st rounders, cash for sweeten of taking of White's contract.
Why for PHO?
Probably the only possibility to package McDyess' contract with White is the using of HOU's trade exception.
"For example, as detailed in question number 84 ), when a team is over the cap and acquires a player in trade, they cannot re-trade that player in combination with other players for two months. Technically, however, this applies only to players traded together using the same exception. For example, Orlando acquired Danny Manning from Phoenix (as part of a package for Penny Hardaway) on 8/5/99. They then traded Manning and Dale Ellis to Milwaukee on 8/19/99. This trade did not violate the two-month rule because they used the assigned player exception for Manning and a traded player exception for Ellis. Since the two players were traded using different exceptions it was not a technical case of aggregation to which the two-month restriction applied, and therefore the trade was legal."
From Larry Coon's FAQ
Suns get enough cap room for a max. FA and saves a lot of money this year.
Why for POR?
They get only expiring deals for Wallace and a future 1st. Both Clark and McDyess are quality bigmen who together could replace Wallace's impact.
Why for UTA?
They get ready for the play-off. Wallace is the best player of the deal, he costs only a mid 1st rounder and they still keep the cap flexibility with Wallace's expiring deal or they can re-sign him if he works well in UTA.
HOU trade
their 6.9 mil trade exception from the Rice trade
future 2nd round pick
HOU get
Jahidi White
their 2004 lotto protected 1st from UTA
NYK's future pick from PHO
3 mil. cash from PHO
PHO trade
Antonio McDyess
Jahidi White
CLE's future 1st
NYK's future 1st
3 mil. cash
PHO get
Greg Ostertag
POR trade
Rasheed Wallace
POR get
Antonio McDyess
Keon Clark
CLE's future 1st
HOU's future 2nd
UTA trade
Greg Ostertag
Keon Clark
HOU's 2004 lotto protected 1st
UTA get
Rasheed Wallace
Why for HOU?
They get a banger to backup Ming and two 1st rounders, cash for sweeten of taking of White's contract.
Why for PHO?
Probably the only possibility to package McDyess' contract with White is the using of HOU's trade exception.
"For example, as detailed in question number 84 ), when a team is over the cap and acquires a player in trade, they cannot re-trade that player in combination with other players for two months. Technically, however, this applies only to players traded together using the same exception. For example, Orlando acquired Danny Manning from Phoenix (as part of a package for Penny Hardaway) on 8/5/99. They then traded Manning and Dale Ellis to Milwaukee on 8/19/99. This trade did not violate the two-month rule because they used the assigned player exception for Manning and a traded player exception for Ellis. Since the two players were traded using different exceptions it was not a technical case of aggregation to which the two-month restriction applied, and therefore the trade was legal."
From Larry Coon's FAQ
Suns get enough cap room for a max. FA and saves a lot of money this year.
Why for POR?
They get only expiring deals for Wallace and a future 1st. Both Clark and McDyess are quality bigmen who together could replace Wallace's impact.
Why for UTA?
They get ready for the play-off. Wallace is the best player of the deal, he costs only a mid 1st rounder and they still keep the cap flexibility with Wallace's expiring deal or they can re-sign him if he works well in UTA.
Last edited: