- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 38,501
- Reaction score
- 19,478
I didn't misunderstand--this is exactly what I thought you meant.
It was humor.
I didn't misunderstand--this is exactly what I thought you meant.
As for remakes, Stout, I couldn't care less. I don't need something to be highly original, I just need it to be good. Almost everything seems like a remake to me anyway so I tend to stay away from tired themes but I have no problem if they recycle names. If something feels too derivative it usually loses me fairly quickly. But you can call someone Buffy without the show feeling like a lazy copy. And most remakes do try to establish themselves as a unique property rather than simply a rehashing.
Ecclesiastes 1:9
What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again
there is nothing new under the sun.
![]()
Designated Survivor has really hit it out of the park with their last 2 returning episodes. The end of the previous episode was totally out of the blue.
Designated Survivor has really hit it out of the park with their last 2 returning episodes. The end of the previous episode was totally out of the blue.
I'm dropping Timeless now. I decided in the middle of the Nazi/Ian Flemming episode. I'm sorry, but the horrific plot holes, lucky breaks, and glossing over of impossibilities/coincidences was just too much. Good concept, bad writers.
I had watched a couple of episodes on Netflix - it was ok.
I like the Spaniard's version much better "The Ministry of Time" More character driven and with a lot less shoot 'em up, kill 'em up. They use doors instead of a time machine.