Cooper's Contract?

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
19,987
Reaction score
12,281
Location
Chandler, Az
It's industry practice for high draft picks not to have offset language. Mark Barron didn't have offset language drafted in the same place last year.

When I get a moment, I'll double-check Jurecki's assertion.

That appears to be changing this year. So far at least 3 of the top 10 have offset language in their contracts.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
33,918
Reaction score
18,966
Location
South Bay
Have to be a pretty good free throw shooter to hit 80% in the NBA. Some shoot a lot less. :D

If you're an 80% FT shooter on that court, then 20% of the time your wife is pissed at you
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,218
Reaction score
27,182
Location
Gilbert, AZ

LDL

Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Posts
462
Reaction score
0

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,218
Reaction score
27,182
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Agree, this is a pretty dumb argument to have on both sides. Perform and you will get yours, don't perform and get what you deserve.

Also, they're haggling over $800K four years from now. Is it really that big a deal?
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Also, they're haggling over $800K four years from now. Is it really that big a deal?

Agree. I don't know what's going on but I think this hurts Coop. Everything I read about him was his great character and work ethic and athletic ability, but this is, frankly, baffling to me. It also shows that he could be difficult to work with in the future when renegotiation comes up. I just don't think it looks good.

That being said, the NFLPA got destroyed during their last negotiation and agreement--especially the Vets (lot of short-term deals across the league for "paltry" money) and this could mainly be an indication of the NFLPA and the agents trying to use whatever leverage they still have left.
 

mwanamatapa

Veteran
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Posts
227
Reaction score
94
The offset language impacts when the player receives his signing bonus money. No offset and he gets it all upfront, offset and the bonus money will be spread over the four years. Improves club's cash flow and if there is Hernandez type behavior, it's easier to fight to not pay the player if you haven't handed it over yet.

I think this is on Keim, he should have been proactive in this and negotiated in good faith and not left it until the last minute. I can't blame the player or agent they are just trying to get the best deal.
 

FrustratedFan04

All Star
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
961
Reaction score
23
The offset language impacts when the player receives his signing bonus money. No offset and he gets it all upfront, offset and the bonus money will be spread over the four years. Improves club's cash flow and if there is Hernandez type behavior, it's easier to fight to not pay the player if you haven't handed it over yet.

I think this is on Keim, he should have been proactive in this and negotiated in good faith and not left it until the last minute. I can't blame the player or agent they are just trying to get the best deal.

But you hold it against the team for trying to get the best deal?
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Stuff like this seriously chaps my ass, especially considering rookie contracts are slotted now.


I know he'll say "My representative is taking care of all that", but they need to put a boot on his throat and tell him to get his Rep in line and get this done.




Off topic - all this "Underdog" stuff Cooper identifies with is ridiculous. How are you an underdog? Youre prototype guard size with exceptional athletic ability. Youre the highest drafted Guard in decades. What makes you an underdog? Because you had a rough upbringing? Welcome to the NFL where thats virtually a requirement.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
60,420
Reaction score
23,120
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
FO needs to get this done ASAP.

Today it starts for real and any time missed will hurt him.

FO has made some really good and decisive moves this offseason so I am surprised this is taking so long.
 

bankybruce

All In!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
26,282
Reaction score
17,869
Location
Nowhere
Jurecki just did a great job of explaining the issue and it is not the money itself. It is about offset money if he is released. That means if he is cut after year 4 and signs with another team for 500K below what the Cardinals owe him, then the Cardinals only owe him 500K. Out of the 6 top 10 picks who have signed, three have it and three don't and Coopers agents wants Cooper to double dip if he is released and the Cardinals have never done a contract to allow that and are not going to bend this time.

The offset language impacts when the player receives his signing bonus money. No offset and he gets it all upfront, offset and the bonus money will be spread over the four years. Improves club's cash flow and if there is Hernandez type behavior, it's easier to fight to not pay the player if you haven't handed it over yet.

I think this is on Keim, he should have been proactive in this and negotiated in good faith and not left it until the last minute. I can't blame the player or agent they are just trying to get the best deal.

You post is incorrect. See my above post as Jurecki spend a good amount of time explaining this. Even K9, after his fact check did not disagree with it and as much crap as I gave him yesterday, if he agrees, there is a 99.9% chance it is correct on that alone. This is on the agent 100% as the Cardinals have never done this and never will just like half of the team who have already signed their top 10 pick.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,218
Reaction score
27,182
Location
Gilbert, AZ
You post is incorrect. See my above post as Jurecki spend a good amount of time explaining this. Even K9, after his fact check did not disagree with it and as much crap as I gave him yesterday, if he agrees, there is a 99.9% chance it is correct on that alone. This is on the agent 100% as the Cardinals have never done this and never will just like half of the team who have already signed their top 10 pick.

That's not true. Half the teams in the NFL DON'T have offset language. I can't say one way or the other whether Patrick Peterson (the last high pick the Cards had under the new CBA) had offset language. But this is a new issue for every team.

Again, this discussion is about $800K possibly having to be paid four years from now. $800K is nothing to the Arizona Cardinals, but it's quite a bit to a kid getting his first real job.

So who's being petty in this deal?
 

bankybruce

All In!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
26,282
Reaction score
17,869
Location
Nowhere
That's not true. Half the teams in the NFL DON'T have offset language. I can't say one way or the other whether Patrick Peterson (the last high pick the Cards had under the new CBA) had offset language. But this is a new issue for every team.

Again, this discussion is about $800K possibly having to be paid four years from now. $800K is nothing to the Arizona Cardinals, but it's quite a bit to a kid getting his first real job.

So who's being petty in this deal?

You make good points and are correct, but according to Jurecki, it has been Cardinal policy to do this with coaches for a very long time, so I should have been clear that when I said the Cardinals have always done this, it was usually with coaches in the past.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
37,218
Reaction score
27,182
Location
Gilbert, AZ
You make good points and are correct, but according to Jurecki, it has been Cardinal policy to do this with coaches for a very long time, so I should have been clear that when I said the Cardinals have always done this, it was usually with coaches in the past.

Coaches have a different CBA than the players do. Player contracts pretty consistently have offset language, although not always (Jake Delhomme's Carolina extension didn't have offset language).

I just don't find the "This is how we've always done things and that's not changing" argument very seriously. The industry practice is fairly clear (although that's changing), and the cost is quite minimal.

The Cards never did voidable years and escalators and never would. Until they did.

The Cards never provided injury waivers for OTAs and minicamps and never would. until they did.
 

bankybruce

All In!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
26,282
Reaction score
17,869
Location
Nowhere
Coaches have a different CBA than the players do. Player contracts pretty consistently have offset language, although not always (Jake Delhomme's Carolina extension didn't have offset language).

I just don't find the "This is how we've always done things and that's not changing" argument very seriously. The industry practice is fairly clear (although that's changing), and the cost is quite minimal.

The Cards never did voidable years and escalators and never would. Until they did.

The Cards never provided injury waivers for OTAs and minicamps and never would. until they did.

Quit making good points, you are making my head hurt. :D
 

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
This is all about the Agents. If they don't do something to make it look like they are doing their job, they won't have any more clients. I'm sure they get additional money for themselves with the language. Makes me puke.
 

mwanamatapa

Veteran
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Posts
227
Reaction score
94
You post is incorrect. See my above post as Jurecki spend a good amount of time explaining this. Even K9, after his fact check did not disagree with it and as much crap as I gave him yesterday, if he agrees, there is a 99.9% chance it is correct on that alone. This is on the agent 100% as the Cardinals have never done this and never will just like half of the team who have already signed their top 10 pick.

The part of my post about believing that this is on Keim and not the agent or player, is my opinion. You may disagree with my opinion but that does not make my post incorrect.

The other part of the post relates to how much of the bonus money could be involved in offset language, depending on how the deal is structured. It in no way contradicts Jurecki's explanation as I was offering another aspect of what is involved in these types of negotiations.

This offset discussion started with Tannehill (New CBA ) as the Dolphins insisted on the language for him. This year, many teams are trying to get it in to set the precedent for the future high picks. As far as I know Peterson was fully guaranteed with no offset language.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,955
Reaction score
5,125
Location
Scottsdale, AZ

Quinn McCollum

Veteran
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Posts
140
Reaction score
0
What really is the bottom line problem? Lots of posts, but what is the deal that the agent wants that is unprecedented?
Sorry but I'm confused on this.

In a nut shell the deal he wants would make sure he got all his money from his rookie contract even if he was cut early and if he was cut early it would let him go get another contract from another team why still getting the money from his rookie deal from Arizona.

That is my understanding of the deal. But that just what I have read. Can't say that is for sure what is going on.

I myself see this type of deal as a way to get off a team I did not want to play for but still get the money.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
538,676
Posts
5,280,771
Members
6,279
Latest member
Monti Ossentfort
Top