the_future23
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2009
- Posts
- 580
- Reaction score
- 15
I'd be for it
Which means exactly what?Complete opposite of an Arians QB....
Peyton Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, Andrew Luck, Carson Palmer. All big QB's that stand in the pocket (mostly), read through progressions, make the tough tight window throws, and take big hits in the process. Taylor is successful because he runs...if he was a pure pocket passer...he would get killed. Hence why he's not an Arians QB.Which means exactly what?
Taylor has a huge arm
I hope not. He's easy to like and fun to root for. Would hate to see him on the 9ersAltho hed probably be amazing in Chip Kellys offense. I have no doubt the 49ers will go after him
Its just a bad system fit.
Altho hed probably be amazing in Chip Kellys offense. I have no doubt the 49ers will go after him
More like 1 more.Arians won't be here longer than 3 more seasons.
didn't they just sign him to new deal? Surprised they gave up on him so quickly.I've read BUF is sitting him this weekend as a precaution to him hitting a $30M guaranteed salary option should he suffer a major injury. Is he a FA?
Peyton Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, Andrew Luck, Carson Palmer. All big QB's that stand in the pocket (mostly), read through progressions, make the tough tight window throws, and take big hits in the process. Taylor is successful because he runs...if he was a pure pocket passer...he would get killed. Hence why he's not an Arians QB.
Well if Carson was the one he chose...then he chose one of the least mobile QB's in the NFL. BA doesn't run a zone-read option offense...he runs a vertical offense that requires the QB to stand in the pocket for several seconds, and get the ball down the field. Tyrod Taylor has never ran that type of offense in his entire career. He also hand picked Drew Stanton (ugh) who isn't the most mobile guy either...so history suggests he likes his big QB's that stand in the pocket. We did have Logan Thomas, and Phillip Sims, who were mobile, but they were also big guys. And BA tried to coach them to be pocket passers, rather than zone-read QB's.Just a question to ponder, how many of those QBs did BA choose? I would say only 1 and that is CP. So to say he doesn't refer a mobile QB is a bit premature IMO. Any coach would be crazy to not like a QB because he is mobile. The real problem I see is that you cant trade for him because of his contract, and I doubt he would sign to be a back up.
I am on board with bringing Tyrod Taylor as a backup to Carson Palemer, and/or a backup for our Quarterback of the future. But, I am not for bringing in Taylor as the Cardinals QB of the future. Taylor would be a great backup, but I think he has shown he cannot be a starter in the NFL.
Lol what? He's better than a lot of starters in the league and did it with zero talent in Buffalo.
Wow, 37 TDs + 10 rushing TDs vs. 12 INTs in Buffalo, with mediocre at best receiving talent... what more does a guy have to do to show he can be a starter in the NFL? (Not that he fits the Cardinals' system.)Taylor would be a great backup, but I think he has shown he cannot be a starter in the NFL.
pull in Taylor,.... then add Terrell Pryor at WR.... that would add loads of "Dynamic" to the team with DJ running the rock.I think Taylor is dynamic. I love his mobility and his deep touch. I just don't think BA would roll the dice with him. But, who knows?
Wow, 37 TDs + 10 rushing TDs vs. 12 INTs in Buffalo, with mediocre at best receiving talent... what more does a guy have to do to show he can be a starter in the NFL? (Not that he fits the Cardinals' system.)
...dbs