Caitlin Clark

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,090
Reaction score
16,391
Location
Laveen, AZ
Geez. Go back and watch when Taurasi came into the league. She got roughed up a lot. Diana also fought back. The only difference is no one was watching the WNBA back then accept us hard core basketball fans. Clark became a viral phenom in college, so everything that happens to, and around her is magnified. You can't breath on her or fans scream. She's not a glass figurine. Watch every night in the WNBA there are other star players getting hard fouls, etc. It's just over magnified with Clark.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
Geez. Go back and watch when Taurasi came into the league. She got roughed up a lot. Diana also fought back. The only difference is no one was watching the WNBA back then accept us hard core basketball fans. Clark became a viral phenom in college, so everything that happens to, and around her is magnified. You can't breath on her or fans scream. She's not a glass figurine. Watch every night in the WNBA there are other star players getting hard fouls, etc. It's just over magnified with Clark.
Sorry Yuma, but this screams that you are really out of touch with Clark and the state of the league.

The league was nothing until Clark got there. Check. That can't be argued.
Clark has taken cheap shot after cheap shot. That is not normal for any league. Check.
The WNBA in their infinite wisdom, decided to hitch their marketing wagon to Angel freaking Reese. Check.
That's like the NBA in the 90s using Dennis Rodman as their poster child.

The problem is it's NOT over magnified with Clark. If it was, we'd be seeing suspensions in EVERY SINGLE GAME that she plays in. EVERY ONE.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,090
Reaction score
16,391
Location
Laveen, AZ
Sorry Yuma, but this screams that you are really out of touch with Clark and the state of the league.

The league was nothing until Clark got there. Check. That can't be argued.
Clark has taken cheap shot after cheap shot. That is not normal for any league. Check.
The WNBA in their infinite wisdom, decided to hitch their marketing wagon to Angel freaking Reese. Check.
That's like the NBA in the 90s using Dennis Rodman as their poster child.

The problem is it's NOT over magnified with Clark. If it was, we'd be seeing suspensions in EVERY SINGLE GAME that she plays in. EVERY ONE.
I guess I just never bought into the hype. I don't even think she's the best player in the league. A'ja Wilson is a much better player in my opinion. She can put teams on her back to win in the playoffs, not just the regular season. She was a one woman wrecking ball against the Mercury in the finals, and we had some tough ladies on the squad who couldn't slow her down. Clark, if she's not hot shooting, she's manageable. I've seen the Mercury beat the Fever when Clark is just normal shooting from the field.

The media and WNBA tried to make that rivalry with Reese so they could have a Magic versus Bird thing to get people interested. Again, hype.

IDK, Chap, I have watched a LOT of WNBA games in my life. Possibly more than anyone on the board. Anything Clark is news and promo for the WNBA. I watch her play. Does she get hard fouls in games? Yes. Do other stars on other teams get that treatment? Yes. Suspensions every single game? OK, let's turn that around. If I came here and said that same thing to you (If it was, we'd be seeing suspensions in EVERY SINGLE GAME that she plays in. EVERY ONE.), you would say, C'mon Yuma, you are way over exaggerating. LOL.

I have watched the Mercury play against her, and not foul her hard all game. A couple games in fact.

She is a good player. No doubt. Is she the best player now? I don't think so. Is she the best ever? Not yet. She's got miles to go. She has potential to be so. Do I think the WNBA is trying to destroy her? Nope. Why would the WNBA hype her games in advertising? She's the face of the league. I just don't buy this narrative they are out to get her. They wouldn't have suspended Thomas if so.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
I guess I just never bought into the hype. I don't even think she's the best player in the league. A'ja Wilson is a much better player in my opinion. She can put teams on her back to win in the playoffs, not just the regular season. She was a one woman wrecking ball against the Mercury in the finals, and we had some tough ladies on the squad who couldn't slow her down. Clark, if she's not hot shooting, she's manageable. I've seen the Mercury beat the Fever when Clark is just normal shooting from the field.

The media and WNBA tried to make that rivalry with Reese so they could have a Magic versus Bird thing to get people interested. Again, hype.

IDK, Chap, I have watched a LOT of WNBA games in my life. Possibly more than anyone on the board. Anything Clark is news and promo for the WNBA. I watch her play. Does she get hard fouls in games? Yes. Do other stars on other teams get that treatment? Yes. Suspensions every single game? OK, let's turn that around. If I came here and said that same thing to you (If it was, we'd be seeing suspensions in EVERY SINGLE GAME that she plays in. EVERY ONE.), you would say, C'mon Yuma, you are way over exaggerating. LOL.

I have watched the Mercury play against her, and not foul her hard all game. A couple games in fact.

She is a good player. No doubt. Is she the best player now? I don't think so. Is she the best ever? Not yet. She's got miles to go. She has potential to be so. Do I think the WNBA is trying to destroy her? Nope. Why would the WNBA hype her games in advertising? She's the face of the league. I just don't buy this narrative they are out to get her. They wouldn't have suspended Thomas if so.
No, she's not the best player, and I'm not even arguing that. In fact, that makes it even worse. We are talking about basketball plays versus non-basketball plays. I guess you think it's ok. I don't.

LOL you have your bias on overdrive. So we'll just agree to disagree. :)

But when Clark gets fed up and leaves, the WNBA will suffer. Count on that.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,090
Reaction score
16,391
Location
Laveen, AZ
No, she's not the best player, and I'm not even arguing that. In fact, that makes it even worse. We are talking about basketball plays versus non-basketball plays. I guess you think it's ok. I don't.

LOL you have your bias on overdrive. So we'll just agree to disagree. :)

But when Clark gets fed up and leaves, the WNBA will suffer. Count on that.
I don't think so. I have just never bought into the league is out to get her. Then makes her the face of the WNBA, and issues suspensions for fouls against her, etc. She a golden goose. They are not going to kill a golden goose.

There's a sensitive fan base when it comes to her. They could be called Clarkies. I just try and watch her like any other player.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
I don't think so. I have just never bought into the league is out to get her. Then makes her the face of the WNBA, and issues suspensions for fouls against her, etc. She a golden goose. They are not going to kill a golden goose.

There's a sensitive fan base when it comes to her. They could be called Clarkies. I just try and watch her like any other player.
I never said the WNBA is out to get her. But they definitely don't care about her. At all. The fact that they focus on marketing Angel Reese instead of Clark is proof of that.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,090
Reaction score
16,391
Location
Laveen, AZ
I never said the WNBA is out to get her. But they definitely don't care about her. At all. The fact that they focus on marketing Angel Reese instead of Clark is proof of that.
I see adverting for Caitlin Clark way more than Angel Reese. Seriously. I can't EVEN go there with you. It's Clark by a mile. LMAO. Now who is biased? The WNBA is 24x7 Caitlin Clark. Might as well rename it. LOL. I hardly ever see Reese's games touted nearly as much as Clark's. I get WNBA emails saying Clark is on TV tonight. I get those as much as the Mercury, who I signed up to get emails about. They still send me Clark emails. They are seriously pushing Clark, and Reese isn't even close. LOL.

This one I have to REALLY disagree with you on.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
I see adverting for Caitlin Clark way more than Angel Reese. Seriously. I can't EVEN go there with you. It's Clark by a mile. LMAO. Now who is biased? The WNBA is 24x7 Caitlin Clark. Might as well rename it. LOL. I hardly ever see Reese's games touted nearly as much as Clark's. I get WNBA emails saying Clark is on TV tonight. I get those as much as the Mercury, who I signed up to get emails about. They still send me Clark emails. They are seriously pushing Clark, and Reese isn't even close. LOL.

This one I have to REALLY disagree with you on.
Very well. I don't think either of us are going to convince the other. I stand by my assertion that the league is doing Clark dirty.

We don't disagree much, but we definitely do on this. :)
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
I will not and am not arguing about Clark's appeal to the fans. So giving me All-star voting stats isn't going to sway me.

But I see the way the WNBA markets Clark, and it is NOT what AI says it is. How do you explain the 30 year poster with Sophie instead of Clark? That is a small thing, yes, but it is really a perfect symbol for where Clark stands with the League. Notice I am saying LEAGUE, and not MEDIA or FANS.

I 100% agree that if there is anyone in the league that should be promoted above Clark, it's Wilson, but Reese for some ungodly reason is also included in that group.
 

FB94

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
4,681
Reaction score
6,532
Location
Anthem
Don’t watch at all, but the perceived pettiness by these players to CC is ridiculous. She does need to toughen up and knock some of these players on their ass, and where the hell are her teammates besides SC that have her back?
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
Don’t watch at all, but the perceived pettiness by these players to CC is ridiculous. She does need to toughen up and knock some of these players on their ass, and where the hell are her teammates besides SC that have her back?
That's definitely fair. The problem with her teammates is that the league is quick to hand out suspensions and fines.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
So I'm going to take a breath and eat some crow, at least about the 30 years poster thing.

Apparently, the poster was made by WinCraft, and there is some sort of deal where that company can use her name, but not her likeness, which is why she's not on the poster. I don't know if that is true or not -- I've only seen it in one place -- but it does seem like a realistic possibility.
 

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
40,485
Reaction score
45,578
Location
Arcadia
caitlin clark getting roughed the hell up is good for the wnba - straight up - the wnba wants to be all up in your algorithm - they want you to be shocked when you see the physicality

they want you to form an opinion on caitlin clark - they want you to defend that opinion - the wnba wants you to pay attention

is she supposed to toughen up and fight instead of playing basketball night in night out?

at what point does her gm go out and get 3 or 4 bruisers soley dedicated to delivering justice?

idk - but i damn sure wanna see what happens next
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
48,970
Reaction score
20,388
Location
Round Rock, TX
caitlin clark getting roughed the hell up is good for the wnba - straight up - the wnba wants to be all up in your algorithm - they want you to be shocked when you see the physicality

they want you to form an opinion on caitlin clark - they want you to defend that opinion - the wnba wants you to pay attention

is she supposed to toughen up and fight instead of playing basketball night in night out?

at what point does her gm go out and get 3 or 4 bruisers soley dedicated to delivering justice?

idk - but i damn sure wanna see what happens next
If that is indeed true, that has "backfire" written all over it.
 

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
7,729
Reaction score
7,924
Location
Circle City, IN
Almost as bad as Alyssa Thomas' punch was Kristi Tolliver defending it on social media, and this:

You must be registered for see images attach



Like, WTF? I can't see Ishbia condoning this bush league crap.
 

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
7,729
Reaction score
7,924
Location
Circle City, IN
Don’t watch at all, but the perceived pettiness by these players to CC is ridiculous. She does need to toughen up and knock some of these players on their ass, and where the hell are her teammates besides SC that have her back?
The officiating is partly to blame, IMO. The game I took my daughter, too, there was a play where CC was shoved on a drive, in front of the ref, and the ref called an offensive foul on Clark. The arena about lost it. The way the zebras are playing it they'd probably foul out all the "enforcers." But maybe that's what's needed, IDK.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
24,142
Reaction score
24,872
Location
Modesto, California
Geez. Go back and watch when Taurasi came into the league. She got roughed up a lot. Diana also fought back. The only difference is no one was watching the WNBA back then accept us hard core basketball fans. Clark became a viral phenom in college, so everything that happens to, and around her is magnified. You can't breath on her or fans scream. She's not a glass figurine. Watch every night in the WNBA there are other star players getting hard fouls, etc. It's just over magnified with Clark.
There is a HUGE difference between getting hard fouled...and getting Aggravated assaulted... Clark falls to the ground and a bitch drops next to her and punches her in the throat... thats not a hard foul brother,...thats a felony
 

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
7,729
Reaction score
7,924
Location
Circle City, IN
There is a HUGE difference between getting hard fouled...and getting Aggravated assaulted... Clark falls to the ground and a bitch drops next to her and punches her in the throat... thats not a hard foul brother,...thats a felony
You must be registered for see images attach
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
24,142
Reaction score
24,872
Location
Modesto, California
I guess I just never bought into the hype. I don't even think she's the best player in the league. A'ja Wilson is a much better player in my opinion. She can put teams on her back to win in the playoffs, not just the regular season. She was a one woman wrecking ball against the Mercury in the finals, and we had some tough ladies on the squad who couldn't slow her down. Clark, if she's not hot shooting, she's manageable. I've seen the Mercury beat the Fever when Clark is just normal shooting from the field.

The media and WNBA tried to make that rivalry with Reese so they could have a Magic versus Bird thing to get people interested. Again, hype.

IDK, Chap, I have watched a LOT of WNBA games in my life. Possibly more than anyone on the board. Anything Clark is news and promo for the WNBA. I watch her play. Does she get hard fouls in games? Yes. Do other stars on other teams get that treatment? Yes. Suspensions every single game? OK, let's turn that around. If I came here and said that same thing to you (If it was, we'd be seeing suspensions in EVERY SINGLE GAME that she plays in. EVERY ONE.), you would say, C'mon Yuma, you are way over exaggerating. LOL.

I have watched the Mercury play against her, and not foul her hard all game. A couple games in fact.

She is a good player. No doubt. Is she the best player now? I don't think so. Is she the best ever? Not yet. She's got miles to go. She has potential to be so. Do I think the WNBA is trying to destroy her? Nope. Why would the WNBA hype her games in advertising? She's the face of the league. I just don't buy this narrative they are out to get her. They wouldn't have suspended Thomas if so.
Best player or not...she is the only reason me, and people like me, have bothered to turn on a WNBA game since the 90's.

gave that league a shot when it started out..was a cheryl miller fan in college... but the simple truth is, it isnt good basketball... not even fundamentally...its slow paced and boring... then player "entitlement" started hitting the wind...so I tuned it out..
a couple decades later, this skinny little white chick comes along and starts making noise on the court...so I tuned back in...
the game still pretty much sucks honestly,...the local high school plays better ball.... but i will throw support out there for a girl that loves the sport enough to take that kind of abuse and keep coming back night after night.
....coming back showed me one thing for certain... the entitlement has gotten worse.
you can be straight,...you can be white,...you can be a good baller... but if you are any two of the three...they are coming for you
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,374,556
Posts
6,597,431
Members
6,433
Latest member
CatsfanJim
Top