kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
You’re thinking of a different Cody Brown my manCody brown was on IR his rookie year…
You’re thinking of a different Cody Brown my manCody brown was on IR his rookie year…
Shame there had to be twoYou’re thinking of a different Cody Brown my man
Joke post, yes?and we have MHJ to show for it, darn…
Always two there areShame there had to be two
My bad. Whoever you’re talking about had to really be trash because I can’t even remember one other than the UConn OLB bust.You’re thinking of a different Cody Brown my man
Then why bring it up? Having a player so good that he signs a second contract is a good thing. If we don't re-sign him after he shows enough production to earn one is a positive. If he doesn't re-sign and we aren't in line for a slew of compensation picks, than it is on the GM.Uh huh, 'cause that was my point
Your viewpoint leaves zero room for nuance. It can be true that you draft a player who isn't ready and you waste a rookie contract developing them. Not getting enough out of the player for 2 or 3 years before they explode is suboptimal. The whole point of a rookie contract is to get solid production for low/limited cost. What people are projecting--and stating that they're fine with getting from Ojulari--is suboptimal. Granted it's all just projections right now, so I very much hope he develops much better and much faster than his age and posters here thinks. Otherwise, the Cards are screwed at edge.Then why bring it up? Having a player so good that he signs a second contract is a good thing. If we don't re-sign him after he shows enough production to earn one is a positive. If he doesn't re-sign and we aren't in line for a slew of compensation picks, than it is on the GM.
Of course it is. Except that even the best teams miss on draft picks, multitudes more than hitting. It happens almost every year. If you can get a player good enough to earn a second contract, that should be considered a win.Your viewpoint leaves zero room for nuance. It can be true that you draft a player who isn't ready and you waste a rookie contract developing them. Not getting enough out of the player for 2 or 3 years before they explode is suboptimal. The whole point of a rookie contract is to get solid production for low/limited cost. What people are projecting--and stating that they're fine with getting from Ojulari--is suboptimal. Granted it's all just projections right now, so I very much hope he develops much better and much faster than his age and posters here thinks. Otherwise, the Cards are screwed at edge.
How often does a team get solid production during the entire rookie contract even for a first rounder?The whole point of a rookie contract is to get solid production for low/limited cost.
Not as often, but posters here are setting a bar extremely low for the 2nd year, and are calmly accepting of it, as if it's okay. This is fueling my reaction. I am not okay if our only edge hope doesn't contribute much for 1/2 of his contract. I get wanting to be pragmatic about the realities of most draft picks, but that reality is too depressing when I think about our lack of any kind of impact at edge. I, for one, am *not* okay with him being "meh" his second season. I want, and the team needs, him to be really good this year. But, according to many here, "meh" is fine, just fine.How often does a team get solid production during the entire rookie contract even for a first rounder?
Meanwhile, missing on that pick until the very end will crush our hopes at a championship, or even competing, until year 4. Like it or not, the team--yes, Monti included--has put the entirety of our edge hopes on one pick's shoulders--Ojulari's. If he doesn't do much until year 4, the Cards won't be doing much either until year 4, and maybe not then, if it's cost our coaching staff their jobs by then.Of course it is. Except that even the best teams miss on draft picks, multitudes more than hitting. It happens almost every year. If you can get a player good enough to earn a second contract, that should be considered a win.
Not getting help from our edge room will hamstring this defense to no end.
I think this isn't really the thinking at all.Meanwhile, missing on that pick until the very end will crush our hopes at a championship, or even competing, until year 4. Like it or not, the team--yes, Monti included--has put the entirety of our edge hopes on one pick's shoulders--Ojulari's. If he doesn't do much until year 4, the Cards won't be doing much either until year 4, and maybe not then, if it's cost our coaching staff their jobs by then.
Not getting help from our edge room will hamstring this defense to no end.
Love it! Can't wait to see how the refs call those penaltiesWell in that case what if the guys that we drafted do this instead?
You must be registered for see images attach
Problem solved!
Ayup.I think this isn't really the thinking at all.
Zaven Collins is the other hope. Dimukeje improving. Gardeck being more effective with less snaps. Darius Robinson playing some snaps at rush backer.
I don't think it's a great plan, but I don't think Ojulari is the only plan.
Unfortunately, when MO choose to trade #3 overall, there haven't exactly been great draft opportunities for an edge.
Wait, then who are you talking about‽You’re thinking of a different Cody Brown my man
Who the hell is the other Cody Brown??Always two there are
Did you watch the guy?Is that all it took to kill this thread? Cody Brown?
Not a drop. But maybe I watched the other Cody Brown, whoever that is.Did you watch the guy?