Of course I have BritCard.
But what I said in my original post is that I honestly think right now there's too much dysfunction around our QB1 to objectively evaluate his performance.
I'm saying there's a correlation between a passer's performance and:
1. A team's WR1 performance
2. A team's ability to run the ball
3. A team's ability to generate YAC
4. A WR corps' ability to stretch the field
5. A team's ability to pass-block.
6. A team's ability to scheme an effective passing game
You say were very good at #5. Eh.
I just watched every pass play from the SEA game again. The pass protection was not good. It wasn't terrible, but SEA consistently collapsed the pocket with just four, and harried K1 most of the night.
Now, SEA is a very good, maybe great, defense. And, our pass blocking was pretty good vs. CAR I thought, and not bad vs. SF. I agree our line is better at that phase of the game. But it's still nothing to write home about. vs. NO for example, there were way too many free runners at Murray.
And then of course, bad run game, bad WR1, questionable OC, no deep threat, no YAC generally (Dortch did have some on the two TD drives vs. SEA surprisingly).
So no. No I'm not ready to give up on Murray because of ADoT or air yards, or YPC.
I'm not giving up on him until we upgrade the Oline and WR room at least a little (and maybe the OC). Or at least until those two groups start playing better than they are now.
