Makes sense, although the last sentence in this
Cronkite piece that I just now read is weird.
Anderson’s contract, which Cronkite News obtained, reveals that compensation will hinge on the definition of his termination.
In the event Anderson terminated his contract “with good reason,” the university is obligated to pay Anderson his salary and performance bonuses earned through the termination date as well as potential liquidated damages, which amount to two times his current salary (at least $950,000). If Anderson resigns without “good reason,” the University will owe Anderson the salary and bonuses earned through the termination date, as well as “any benefit continuation rights as required by law.”
If Anderson had been fired with cause, the university would have owed Anderson the salary and bonuses earned through the termination date, as well as “any benefit continuation rights as required by law,” unless there were NCAA violations, in which case Anderson would owe any “special compensation or performance bonus” paid after the infractions back to ASU.
However, because Anderson will still remain employed by the university, the amount he will receive through the end of his contract remains uncertain.