CP3 Rumored Trade

Chris Paul for Oubre/Rubio/Jerome?

  • Yes I would make the trade

  • No I would not make the trade


Results are only viewable after voting.

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,752
Reaction score
61,605
Thing with Mikal is that he's great without being an elite athlete. The guys arms are so freaking long, it makes up more than enough for any lack of athleticism.

But let's not mistake, you don't have to be an "elite" athlete to be a star in this league.

Ok.
 

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
Mikal about to go on a run of all-defense teams and clowns here arguing he isn’t an elite athlete
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,787
Reaction score
1,485
okay, well that’s stupid.
I don't know. That 17m-18m figure was only if they renounced everyone. Now they can bring everyone back and still sign a 10m per year player. I think had they gone the route of opening the cap space it would have left them too thin and I'm not sure anyone in that price range is worth risking the depth for.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,977
Reaction score
14,612
Location
Round Rock, TX
I don't know. That 17m-18m figure was only if they renounced everyone. Now they can bring everyone back and still sign a 10m per year player. I think had they gone the route of opening the cap space it would have left them too thin and I'm not sure anyone in that price range is worth risking the depth for.
That's the question I'd like to see clarified.

It would also be predicated on whether Sarver is willing to spend. If he is, that would be BIG deal.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,947
Reaction score
6,203
I don't know. That 17m-18m figure was only if they renounced everyone. Now they can bring everyone back and still sign a 10m per year player. I think had they gone the route of opening the cap space it would have left them too thin and I'm not sure anyone in that price range is worth risking the depth for.
Yeah makes sense. Essentially once you renounce guys like Saric you can no longer sign them when your already over the cap.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,787
Reaction score
1,485
That's the question I'd like to see clarified.

It would also be predicated on whether Sarver is willing to spend. If he is, that would be BIG deal.

I mean that 17m figure definitely means we lose Saric and Baynes, maybe even Carter(haven't done the math). So it's really a question of if you would rather have Saric(and possibly Baynes) and a 10m per player(plus additional BAE if needed) or lose all those guys and get someone at 17m.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,977
Reaction score
14,612
Location
Round Rock, TX
I mean that 17m figure definitely means we lose Saric and Baynes, maybe even Carter(haven't done the math). So it's really a question of if you would rather have Saric(and possibly Baynes) and a 10m per player(plus additional BAE if needed) or lose all those guys and get someone at 17m.
And in this climate in this year, who would be WORTH 17m to replace all those guys we'd have to renounce?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,195
Reaction score
52,766
Was Oubre our third string SG?

Suns traded two starters and a first round pick for one starter.

Lots of ground to be made up without many assets except the 10th pick.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
44,977
Reaction score
14,612
Location
Round Rock, TX
Suns traded two starters and a first round pick for one starter.

Lots of ground to be made up without many assets except the 10th pick.
Come on Main, that is one of the worst ways to look at it. If we traded for Giannis getting rid of Oubre/Rubio and a first rounder, would you generalize like that?
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,947
Reaction score
6,203
Suns traded two starters and a first round pick for one starter.

Lots of ground to be made up without many assets except the 10th pick.
By their own admission they no longer saw Oubre as a starter for them going forward.

Therefor they traded a starting PG for an upgrade at that position and sent out a solid bench player and a future pick to make it happen.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,195
Reaction score
52,766
Come on Main, that is one of the worst ways to look at it. If we traded for Giannis getting rid of Oubre/Rubio and a first rounder, would you generalize like that?

If the Suns had traded for Giannis I would be jumping up and down with jubilation with the trade. I would have even sweetened it considerably.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,752
Reaction score
61,605
Mikal about to go on a run of all-defense teams and clowns here arguing he isn’t an elite athlete

you can be a good defender, hell even a great defender, while not being an elite athlete.

why that is so hard for you to understand is beyond me.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
you can be a good defender, hell even a great defender, while not being an elite athlete.

why that is so hard for you to understand is beyond me.

Yup. Ironically, Exhibit A for that is none other than Chris Paul.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,195
Reaction score
52,766
By their own admission they no longer saw Oubre as a starter for them going forward.

Therefor they traded a starting PG for an upgrade at that position and sent out a solid bench player and a future pick to make it happen.

It's easy to rationalize a trade. The proof will be in the pudding.

The best reason for the trade is it makes Booker happy. If that's what it took, so be it.
 

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
It’s not worth arguing about.

Suns1 said the Suns will now be unathletic and that’s wrong and doesn’t matter.

stupid semantic digression and can’t teach some folks
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,752
Reaction score
61,605
Rudy Gobert isn't an elite athlete. Long and mobile, but not elite. Of course that depends on your definition of "elite."

Ok. I’ve already said numerous times that you don’t need to be an elite athlete to be a good or even great defender.
 
Top