Three Team Race?

Card'em

All Star
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Posts
793
Reaction score
1,995
Here in St. Louis the local radio personalities are calling the NFC West a three team race with the Rams being the surprise contender. No doubt that the Rams will be improved and may contend for the division, but there is absolutely no consideration of the Cards. Talk about flying under the radar...we're super stealth. The NSA's got nothin' on us.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
No surprise there. Though stranger things have happened, teams that finish 5-11 and 1-5 in the division the prior season aren't usually considered contenders.

What helps the Rams is that they almost swept the division last year and have had a strong offseason.
 

NashDishesDimes

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Posts
1,959
Reaction score
777
Absolutely not. The only reason the Rams win in the division is because teams walk in there thinking it is a gimme game.
Why are people always giving the Rams credit??? They dont do anything great. They lost Stephen Jackson, their OL has been a mess, Jake long is overrated at this point, Sam Bradford is the worst QB in the division, their secondary is young and weak, they have no recivers except for Austin who is not a posession reciever.
 

Jay Cardinal

Die Hard Cardinals Fan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Posts
1,347
Reaction score
341
Location
Tempe, AZ
I am not a 100% sold on the rams changes either. Stephen Jackson was the heart and soul of that team and Bradford has yet to show he is a franchise qb. I do think they have made some great picks on defense the last couple years. Janoris Jenkins and Michael brockers look like solid players for years to come.
 

Cards Czar

The Bird is the Word
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,175
Reaction score
375
Location
Alton, Ill
Here in St. Louis the local radio personalities are calling the NFC West a three team race with the Rams being the surprise contender. No doubt that the Rams will be improved and may contend for the division, but there is absolutely no consideration of the Cards. Talk about flying under the radar...we're super stealth. The NSA's got nothin' on us.


Don't believe everything you hear from 101 ESPN "The Fast Lane". Randy Karraker (Who hates the Cardinals because they left) and D'Marco Farr because he was a Ram. They are both total homers.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
Absolutely not. The only reason the Rams win in the division is because teams walk in there thinking it is a gimme game.
Why are people always giving the Rams credit??? They dont do anything great. They lost Stephen Jackson, their OL has been a mess, Jake long is overrated at this point, Sam Bradford is the worst QB in the division, their secondary is young and weak, they have no recivers except for Austin who is not a posession reciever.

Can't speak for others, but I give the Rams credit because they have a lot of young, fast, talent, have a pretty good head coach, and appear to have had another strong offseason.

And I'd call leading the NFL in sacks great. And with a young DLine that will probably get better as last year's 1st rounder Brockers develops and the addition of LB Ogletree to help via the blitz.

Offensively, I believe that Jared Cook and Tavon Austin are going to be matchup nightmares for most teams and I haven't forgotten how that rookie Chris Givens torched the team last year. Couple that with Bradford playing in same offense for the first time since he's entered the league and I expect them to make a serious run at the division title.

Steven Jackson is a big name, but I've always thought he was overrated. I question just how big of a loss he will be given his backups averaged more yards per carry. And unlike Jackson, they have the home run speed to take it the distance.
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,300
Reaction score
42,809
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Can't speak for others, but I give the Rams credit because they have a lot of young, fast, talent, have a pretty good head coach, and appear to have had another strong offseason.

And I'd call leading the NFL in sacks great. And with a young DLine that will probably get better as last year's 1st rounder Brockers develops and the addition of LB Ogletree to help via the blitz.

Offensively, I believe that Jared Cook and Tavon Austin are going to be matchup nightmares for most teams and I haven't forgotten how that rookie Chris Givens torched the team last year. Couple that with Bradford playing in same offense for the first time since he's entered the league and I expect them to make a serious run at the division title.

Steven Jackson is a big name, but I've always thought he was overrated. I question just how big of a loss he will be given his backups averaged more yards per carry. And unlike Jackson, they have the home run speed to take it the distance.

This. For the most part. What the Rams are lacking, IMO, is size.

I don't know if the Rams can push for a division title, just because there aren't a lot of markers there that St. Louis is in the position to challege teams outside of the division.

St. Louis was 4-3-1 in games decided by a TD or less. They finished 8-7-1 despite being outscored by 49 points.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
This. For the most part. What the Rams are lacking, IMO, is size.

I don't know if the Rams can push for a division title, just because there aren't a lot of markers there that St. Louis is in the position to challege teams outside of the division.

St. Louis was 4-3-1 in games decided by a TD or less. They finished 8-7-1 despite being outscored by 49 points.

Austin is small. They lose size with Jackson's replacements at RB. But, otherwise I don't see them as having a lack of size.

And that 45-7 lost to New England overseas provided for 38 of the 49 points they were outscored.
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Austin is small. They lose size with Jackson's replacements at RB. But, otherwise I don't see them as having a lack of size.

That team has such potential offensively. By adding Austin and Bailey via the draft, along with Cook via free agency, they could wind up being a very explosive receiving core. Givens showed glimpses last season of being a good WR and I still think Brian Quick has a future. Honestly, as this team develops, if Bradford doesn't succeed, it's not by fault of the team for not trying to surround him with talent. As for defense, that's Jeff Fisher's MO. They'll be more than fine there.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
IMO it;s going to be a 4 team scramble in the last 5 weeks of the season. Ram fans look through the same glasses we do. I think that Ram fans are going to push verbally for their team as we do for ours. Our QB vs. theirs. Our 4 backs VS. theirs. Improved O-line and a D that will bring it without Wash and then bring it some more.

I like our chances. It will be a great season as the Cards take the division at 9-7.

GBR
40
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,471
Reaction score
848
IMO it;s going to be a 4 team scramble in the last 5 weeks of the season. Ram fans look through the same glasses we do. I think that Ram fans are going to push verbally for their team as we do for ours. Our QB vs. theirs. Our 4 backs VS. theirs. Improved O-line and a D that will bring it without Wash and then bring it some more.

I like our chances. It will be a great season as the Cards take the division at 9-7.

GBR
40


seered you are a great Cards fan but I think the Niners and Seahawks both

win more than nine games. This year I would love for the team to simply

win 8 games and show improvement
 

Cardsfanstl

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Posts
3,350
Reaction score
1,002
Location
St. Louis
Don't believe everything you hear from 101 ESPN "The Fast Lane". Randy Karraker (Who hates the Cardinals because they left) and D'Marco Farr because he was a Ram. They are both total homers.

You speak the truth. I like the fact they are not talking about us. In my opinion Rams this year will really miss Jackson and Amendola.
 

TJ

Knower of Ball
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
39,136
Reaction score
27,583
Location
South Bay
You speak the truth. I like the fact they are not talking about us. In my opinion Rams this year will really miss Jackson and Amendola.

Amendola has played on average just a hair above 10 games per season in his four year career with the Rams. If Tavon Austin can play the whole season, Amendola will be an afterthought.

Jackson is a different story. He will be missed for his hard running and leadership. If Bradford cannot execute with guys like Cook and Austin in the fold, their offense could be historically bad.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
Amendola has played on average just a hair above 10 games per season in his four year career with the Rams. If Tavon Austin can play the whole season, Amendola will be an afterthought.

Jackson is a different story. He will be missed for his hard running and leadership. If Bradford cannot execute with guys like Cook and Austin in the fold, their offense could be historically bad.

Yep. Amendola has played in 12 total games the past couple of seasons.

Jackson's leadership may be an issue, but his hard running doesn't seem to have done much for the team these past few seasons, which is one reason why I believe he is overrated.
 
Top