Welcome Mr. Faneca

PoolBoy

BIRDGANG
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Posts
5,734
Reaction score
0
Location
Sec. 450
Faneca knows this could be his last Steelers game

Associated Press

You must be registered for see images attach
George Gojkovich/Getty ImagesAlan Faneca likely won't be back in Pittsburgh next season.

PITTSBURGH -- Ten seasons, seven Pro Bowls and maybe one last game.
Few players in Pittsburgh Steelers history have performed as well in a career as Alan Faneca, arguably the NFL's best left guard and a lineman whose personality and work ethic seem a perfect match for the franchise.
Faneca is a team-first player in a sport that has increasingly become me-first, the steadiest of players in an unstable profession where one bad game can ruin a season or a career.
"My agent kept telling me before the (1999) draft he had a feeling I was coming here," Faneca said Thursday. "He kept saying, `I think you're a fit, that's where you're going to go,' and he was right. I think I fit that Steeler mold, I guess."
After a decade with the same team, every game now could be Faneca's last with the Steelers, beginning with their AFC wild-card playoff game against Jacksonville on Saturday night.
The 31-year-old Faneca, for all of his accomplishments, is unsigned past this season and appears to have little chance of returning to Pittsburgh.

With the Steelers seeded only fifth in the AFC field, they can play again at Heinz Field in these playoffs only if they win twice and sixth-seeded Tennessee stages two upset victories.
"Ten years yeah, it's sad, I'll take a moment, man," said Faneca, the player known as "Red" to his teammates because of his long, flowing red hair. "I'll have to take a moment sometime during the game to enjoy it, and think back when the game's over and I'm the last man on the field, stuff like that.
"You just take it and enjoy it."
Even if this season has been his least favorite.
Faneca felt the Steelers misled him in brief and very unsatisfactory contract talks last winter, so much so he was harshly critical of the Rooney family after reporting for a mandatory minicamp in May.
"This will be my last year as a Pittsburgh Steeler," he said.
Few, if any, Steelers players have been so openly hostile while still playing for the team, and there has been no apparent contract movement for months.
His Steelers career isn't officially over, but he fully expects to be on the free agent market in March.
"I think if it (a new contract) was going to happen it would have happened," Faneca said. "The door is never closed, but there is a point where reality sets in."
Faneca won't speculate what he might be worth, even though offensive guards were given some of the biggest deals during last year's market. Cleveland's Eric Steinbach, San Diego's Kris Dielman and Buffalo's Derrick Dockery landed deals worth a combined $52.5 million in guaranteed money and $137 million overall.
The Steelers' offer to Faneca wasn't believed to be anywhere close to comparable money, even though his $25.6 million contract in 2002 helped set the standard for guards.
Based on last year's figures, Faneca could be offered $7 million a year or more in his next contract, or far more than the $4,375,000 he's making in salary and bonuses this season.
How good has Faneca been in Pittsburgh? He was the first guard in team history to make All-Pro in successive seasons, and the first to make the Pro Bowl twice since John Nisby in 1960 and 1962. Faneca has been chosen each of the last seven seasons.
"Ten years here kind of forces you to reflect," Faneca said. "It's a big chunk of my life."
A big hole for the Steelers to fill, too.
The Steelers are known for allowing players to leave late in their careers when they feel they have a comparable replacement on hand.
Last year, they released linebacker Joey Porter, who immediately signed with Miami for $20 million guaranteed. The Steelers' lower-paid replacement, James Harrison, wound up being the team MVP and a Pro Bowl pick.
But the Steelers don't appear to have a replacement lined up for Faneca.
Their options are to plug in backup Chris Kemoeatu, draft a guard in April and start him immediately or sign a guard on the open market. Given how salaries keep increasing, it might cost them more to sign a guard than it would have to re-sign Faneca a year or two ago.
Despite the unsatisfactory contract talks, Faneca will always consider Pittsburgh to be a second home.
"There's been a lot of good times, a lot of good teams here," he said. "It's been fun here."
Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press

story off of NFL.com

sounds good to me, i really see him as a Card next year. his nickname is Red for god sakes.
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
814
Location
Bakersfield, CA
I would love to see the Card's line get even better but is the pricetag that Faneca's going to command really worth it? I don't think it is. Whether or not they spend the money wisely, I think the team would be better served to address the many areas of concern rather than 1 high priced free agent.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
8,358
Reaction score
5,856
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
I would love to see the Card's line get even better but is the pricetag that Faneca's going to command really worth it? I don't think it is. Whether or not they spend the money wisely, I think the team would be better served to address the many areas of concern rather than 1 high priced free agent.

The question is what that pricetag really says. Faneca still sholuld have 3-4 years left in the tank, but because he's older he isn't getting anywhere near what Steinbach et al got last season.
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
13,517
Reaction score
6,657
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Too expensive for the Cards. Need to better use the money on its own core players.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,575
Reaction score
33,308
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Too expensive for the Cards. Need to better use the money on its own core players.

Where's the sarcasm smiley? 'Cause what, like we're going to extend and give raises to guys like Wells? You know, we have plenty of money for extensions, with a ton left over for FA, right? Even if we try really hard to waste all of our money in silly contracts again, we should still have cap space.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Where's the sarcasm smiley? 'Cause what, like we're going to extend and give raises to guys like Wells? You know, we have plenty of money for extensions, with a ton left over for FA, right? Even if we try really hard to waste all of our money in silly contracts again, we should still have cap space.

So you keep saying....

(after you figure out and itemize Fitz's new deal, Dansby?, Pace?, Johnson?, Hodel?, Gandy?, Berry?, Ross? and our RFA's - Smith, Brown, Green, Blackstock, etc.)

Perhaps, you can give us some exact numbers, rather than your usual off season assertion, that there's $$$$$ galore.
 

lobo

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
3,310
Reaction score
230
Location
Inverness, Il
Too expensive for the Cards. Need to better use the money on its own core players.


Agree....and spend the money on other F/A where the need NOW is even greater than O/L. Not to say it can't be improved, but at least we are in the big part of the NFL bell curve with the O/L...certainly not so insofar as DB's and edge rushers go.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,751
Reaction score
1,310
Location
Needles, Ca.
Some of those you mentioned (Fitz, Berry, Ross and Gandy) we will be able to save some cap space with restructured deals (I think)......where's that thread by joe.......
 

Twist18

Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2003
Posts
884
Reaction score
24
Location
Pocahontas , IL
Faneca's play will not be the biggest benefit for the Cards, it is his leadership. He gives the line a nasty identity which always helps to instill fear in opposing D's.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Depending on cap-terms and physical evaluation (3+ likely years of good football left, I'd like to see Faneca at LG.

At the risk of sounding contentious - I'm still not happy with our running game production and feel that Faneca in place of Wells (who might be a better fit at LT anyway) would be a significant upgrade.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
So you keep saying....

(after you figure out and itemize Fitz's new deal, Dansby?, Pace?, Johnson?, Hodel?, Gandy?, Berry?, Ross? and our RFA's - Smith, Brown, Green, Blackstock, etc.)

Perhaps, you can give us some exact numbers, rather than your usual off season assertion, that there's $$$$$ galore.

Dansby and Pace are the only ones on that list that will cost anything.

Gandy, Berry and Ross are already under contract are already included in the 20+ Mill we will have for free agents this offseason so not sure why they are on the list. Cutting them or restructuring them like Ross did last year will actually save us money.

Hodel is a LS. Small beans. Not sure why he is on the lsit.

Fitz new deal will actually save us cap space. Putting him on that list doesnt do much for your arguement.

RFA's wont cost us more then 2 Mill each max.

No issues with the cap what so ever with that list of players and getting free agents. Combine that with not having to pay a top 5 pick and Stout is even more correct about the cap and his assertion.

The only issue is how much total upfront money will the cards want to give in one offseason and will they use up most of the cap becuase of rosters bonuses again.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
I'm still astounded that Cards fans are saying things like "He's a great player, but I don't want the cards to assume that salary."

Great players cost money, people. The good thing is this: It's not your money.

Despite improvement, our line needs help--especially in the run game. Faneca fits the bill, and he's worth a top-guard's salary.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,381
Reaction score
19,210
Location
Chandler, Az
I think Faneca will be our one big FA signing this year.

Does that mean that Wells moves back to Tackle then?
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,751
Reaction score
1,310
Location
Needles, Ca.
I think Faneca will be our one big FA signing this year.

Does that mean that Wells moves to back-up Tackle then?

There, fixed it for ya'...........:D
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Dansby and Pace are the only ones on that list that will cost anything.

Gandy, Berry and Ross are already under contract are already included in the 20+ Mill we will have for free agents this offseason so not sure why they are on the list. Cutting them or restructuring them like Ross did last year will actually save us money.

Hodel is a LS. Small beans. Not sure why he is on the lsit.

Fitz new deal will actually save us cap space. Putting him on that list doesnt do much for your arguement.

RFA's wont cost us more then 2 Mill each max.

No issues with the cap what so ever with that list of players and getting free agents. Combine that with not having to pay a top 5 pick and Stout is even more correct about the cap and his assertion.

The only issue is how much total upfront money will the cards want to give in one offseason and will they use up most of the cap becuase of rosters bonuses again.


Thanks... so, roughly - what are we talking about in terms of cap $$$ available?
 

az240zz

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Posts
3,314
Reaction score
542
If the Cards had done what most suggested last year and kept Davis ,moved him to guard, then we wouldn't be talking about Faneca.
 

Savage58

Defense, Defense, DEFENSE
Joined
Jan 3, 2004
Posts
1,045
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
If the Cards had done what most suggested last year and kept Davis ,moved him to guard, then we wouldn't be talking about Faneca.

We'd also probably went 6-10 or worse from his constant false starts at key moments late in the game. :p Sorry couldn't resist.

Faneca > LD I'd be very happy to sign Faneca for 4 years/22M prorate it as you wish, not sure if he'll get a better offer than that at his age, and we have his homie Grimm here.
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
814
Location
Bakersfield, CA
If the Cards had done what most suggested last year and kept Davis ,moved him to guard, then we wouldn't be talking about Faneca.
No, but they'd likely be paying LD more than what Faneca's going to be getting a year later. Faneca will get a good contract but he won't be hitting the stratosphere like Hutch and Big. Besides all of which, if all else stayed the same, LD would likely have needed to stay/move to tackle again and that's specifically what he didn't want and wouldn't benefit the Cards. It was just time for him to move on.
 

Rivercard

Too much good stuff
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
33,231
Reaction score
23,494
Location
Is everything
If the Cards had done what most suggested last year and kept Davis ,moved him to guard, then we wouldn't be talking about Faneca.

Yep. The Davis fiasco indicates the Cards brass refuse to pay big money for a guard. Why would they change that philosophy now?
 

Rivercard

Too much good stuff
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
33,231
Reaction score
23,494
Location
Is everything
:deadhorse2:

It was time for both parties to part company, IMO.

Considering the state of the Cards OL at the time, that doesn't really make any sense from a Cardinal perspective in terms of fielding a talented team. It had to be about $$ didn't it?
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Considering the state of the Cards OL at the time, that doesn't really make any sense from a Cardinal perspective in terms of fielding a talented team. It had to be about $$ didn't it?

I'd reply, but I promised I wouldn't say anything more about Big. :D
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
:deadhorse2:

It was time for both parties to part company, IMO. That is the last I will ever say on the subject.

I agree, with draft pick compensation in return.:D
 

Cards Czar

The Bird is the Word
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,174
Reaction score
373
Location
Alton, Ill
Now I am understanding this that the 17-18 mil owed Fitz is already calculated in the the cap numbers that leave us with around 30 mil left. Fitz will be getting a new cotract and that should bring it down to around 8-9 mil for Fitz. That would still make our cap numbers about the same. Signing Faneca would be wise as to bringing a more nastiness to the OL. This should be a no brainer.

navy Mike
 
Top