When we draft a DT, must be able to rush QB

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,670
Reaction score
17,139
Location
San Antonio, Texas
The Berry signing was great but not enough. Drafting a player like Tubbs would not help the pass rush directly. Hopefully, Dennis Johnson can elevate his play and improve on his late success last season.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Originally posted by Jetstream Green
The Berry signing was great but not enough. Drafting a player like Tubbs would not help the pass rush directly. Hopefully, Dennis Johnson can elevate his play and improve on his late success last season.

That is why you draft Washington in 2 or Wilfork in 1.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
I respectfully disagree - Jet Ski.

What we need in the middle is someone who can stone the run and also exert some pressure up the middle to prevent the QB from stepping up into the pocket when rushed by Berry from the outside.

We have 2 - 3 penetrator types in Bryant, Bell and (you could argue) King. Unfortunately, our massive NT gap clogging types are Tanner (who only shows an occasional flash) and Bell (who's better at pursuit than at either penetrating or 2-gapping).

There's also the outside possibility that, if our outside guys can put enough pressure on the passer, it will automatically free up one of our current inside guys to come up thru the middle.

Another way to put it is: We probably will only draft one DT in the first 3 - 4 rounds. If we draft a pass rusher, we'll remain (for the umpteenth season) soft against runs up the middle. Sure it would be nice to draft a penetrator AND a run-clogger, but if we only choose one, I'd rather it be the run-clogger.
 

Brevity

Tryin' to get my lap back
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Posts
403
Reaction score
0
Location
A cul-de-sac
I agree the Berry signing is not enough for the D-line.

Does anyone think the D-line play will improve with a new position coach?
 

Weenus O'Baggins

Arizona Sports Simp
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
46,787
Reaction score
42,637
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Originally posted by JeffGollin
I respectfully disagree - Jet Ski.
Sure it would be nice to draft a penetrator AND a run-clogger, but if we only choose one, I'd rather it be the run-clogger.

We need another Eric Swann :D
 

jw7

Woof!
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Posts
8,194
Reaction score
7
Location
Ahwatukee
Doesn't DJ play end? Or have you heard plans to move him in the middle this year?
 

Ryanwb

ASFN IDOL
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
35,576
Reaction score
10
Location
Mesa
regardless of the type of DT, the middle of the DL is definately the weakest link IMO. If Starks comes back healthy I will feel good about CB, but the defensive tackles on this team leave a lot to be desired. Wendell needs to step up his game
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
Originally posted by Brevity

Does anyone think the D-line play will improve with a new position coach?
Absolutely. I think the addition of Berry and a new coach/scheme will improve the sack total by at least 8 - 10 sacks.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,470,568
Posts
6,710,938
Members
6,438
Latest member
NamasteDave
Top