Warner out to prove critics wrong

CardsGuy

Registered
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Posts
304
Reaction score
0
Just like with Rams and Giants, Warner out to prove critics wrong

By Darren Urban, Tribune

The resumé is too long for the story to begin where it once did. Kurt Warner knows that.
His past is decorated with two MVP awards, three Pro Bowls, two Super Bowl appearances and a St. Louis fan base that still follows him two stops later.



Warner is no longer the nobody who took over at quarterback for the Rams in 1999, but in some ways, he is starting over.

He has more doubters than believers, which is where he stood that day St. Louis coach Dick Vermeil made him the starter after Trent Green’s season-ending knee injury almost six years ago.

And like his Rams back then, his new team in Arizona carries few expectations.

"There are a lot of people out there that don’t think I can still play, and there’s a lot of people out there that don’t think this team has a chance to do anything," Warner said. The statistics haven’t been gaudy for three years, and for Warner, his history has become his burden. But it is also his proof.

"There has never been a story like Kurt Warner’s," Cardinals coach Dennis Green said. "It’s a result of him believing in himself." Warner still believes. He believes that winning football — if not video game-like stats — remains in him.

He believes politics dragged him out of the lineup with both the Rams and the New York Giants. He believes he will be reborn as an NFL starter with the Cardinals this season. And he believes he has lived this scenario before. "It’s kind of my story, the underdog story, no chance to have success," Warner said. "It’s kind of like what I stepped into in St. Louis.

"I get a chance to rewrite my story, and I get a chance to hopefully rewrite the story of the Arizona Cardinals."

FROM HERO TO HUMBLED

The first version of Warner’s story came straight from Hollywood.

He was nowhere, bagging groceries at one point after college, eventually thinking a successful arena football career in his native Iowa was as far as the dream might go. Then, in one stunning two-year period, he rose from Iowa Barnstormer to St. Louis Ram as ringleader of the "Greatest Show on Turf."

"St. Louis football was dog meat for so long," longtime St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bernie Miklasz said. "Then this mythical character out of a W.P. Kinsella novel walks out of the Iowa cornfields."

He won a Super Bowl that first season as a starter. He set team records. He was one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. And he was a good person, friendly almost to a fault, a sports hero fans could feel good about embracing.

Warner was going to be a Ram forever.

That he isn’t now, "flabbergasts me a little bit," Warner admitted.

The divorce was painful. Many fans didn’t want their adopted son going anywhere. But coach Mike Martz had decided Marc Bulger was his quarterback going forward, and the once unthinkable happened last summer.

Warner was released.

"This game is a lot about politics," he said. "It’s a lot about draft picks. It’s a lot about one person’s opinion of a certain situation, and you have to learn to deal with that."

Warner insists he doesn’t hold a grudge against Martz or anyone in St. Louis.

Through a team spokesman, Martz declined to be interviewed for this story.

"People have a real misunderstanding of our relationship, and it’s really unfortunate," Martz told the Post-Dispatch a year ago. "It’s never changed, it’s never wavered. But I have an obligation as a head coach to do what’s best for this football team."

Martz’s style may have cost Warner. The system was based on precision and flooding the field with receivers. Many times, Miklasz said, Warner was pounded by the defense as he delivered his passes. That apparently took a toll.

Mark Bartlestein, Warner’s longtime agent, was frustrated by the pounding his client’s reputation had taken.

"To me, the hard thing for Kurt wasn’t that he played poorly, it was that he was an MVP on that short of a leash," Bartlestein said.

It was a broken hand — an injury that Warner unknowingly played with part of the time — that derailed his 2002 season. In 2003, Warner suffered a concussion in the opening game, and Bulger played the rest of the year.

But there also remain questions about the thumb on his throwing hand, first injured in 2001.

And these were the stats Warner was fighting: In his last eight games as a Rams’ starting quarterback, St. Louis went 0-8. He had four touchdown passes, 11 interceptions and 14 fumbles.

"I respect him a lot, but in my opinion, he never really owned up to the fact his play declined," Miklasz said. "That’s not to say it’s not reversible. But Kurt has not been the same quarterback."

GIANT STEP

Warner’s year in New York had a built-in shelf life. He didn’t sign with the Giants until after the team had acquired rookie quarterback Eli Manning.

"We had a great understanding when he came, we were basically going to try and use each other," Giants general manager Ernie Accorsi said.

Warner was disappointed again, however. After directing the Giants to a 5-2 record, he lost his last two starts to Chicago and Arizona. The team was still above .500, but with Warner taking 13 sacks in those losses and the future of an injury-riddled team looking bleak, the Giants decided to jump-start Manning’s career.

Warner was benched and left shaking his head.

"What happened in New York, I won’t say I definitely agreed with it or it was exactly how it was laid out it was going to be, but it wasn’t like, ‘Oh my gosh, how could this happen?’ " Warner said. "He was a No. 1 draft pick, they paid him 50 million dollars, it was a matter of time before it happened."

Warner’s numbers were better in New York than at the end in St. Louis. His passing rating of 86.5 was his best since 2001, and he could have had more than his six touchdown passes.

Bartlestein said 12 times last season a Giants receiver was tackled inside the 5-yard line after catching a Warner pass, only to have the drive end with a rushing touchdown or a field goal.

Warner called that "your agent talking," but acknowledged the Giants’ offense under coach Tom Coughlin wasn’t conducive to piling up big numbers.

"This is a stats-driven business," Warner said. "Obviously my stats in St. Louis were off the chart. The first thing you go against was everyone compares you to St. Louis and you won’t have the same stats as you did in St. Louis."

Accorsi said he "absolutely" thinks Warner can still play at a high level, reiterating some of the injury problems that plagued the Giants last season.

He also praised Warner as a teammate and an employee.

"We are just a better organization because he passed through here," Accorsi said.

And that means a lot to Warner.

Warner is a Christian man, deep into his faith. He and his wife Brenda — who passed on an invitation to be interviewed for this story — created the First Things First Foundation to share those values.

As hard as his professional path has been lately, Warner said he simply takes it as the plan God has laid out for him.

"If you had ever asked me if that would have been possible, to win a Super Bowl, win an MVP but to have more influence when I wasn’t playing and when things weren’t going well, I’d have thought you were nuts," Warner said. "But I have seen people come to understand who I am and what I stand for and what I believe in more effectively because of the consistency I have had character-wise through those highs and lows."

STARTING OVER

Warner will play against the Rams for the first time Oct. 9 at Sun Devil Stadium. His signing with St. Louis’ one-time franchise made big news there, especially with fans still upset Warner is no longer a Ram.

"With the hatred of Martz in this town and love of Warner," Miklasz said, "there’s no doubt in my mind the day he signed with the Arizona Cardinals, a number of Rams fans defected."

Finding his way to Arizona was not hard once the Cardinals expressed an interest in him. Only two other teams seriously considered Warner, and Chicago and Detroit both made it clear they wanted Warner as a backup.

Warner had the same problem finding a starting job the previous offseason.

"Kurt will tell you there’s nothing wrong," Rams receiver and former teammate Torry Holt said during ESPN’s draft coverage Saturday. "(But) the numbers don’t lie."

Green said it was Warner’s competitiveness and record as a winner that drew his attention. Warner said it was the collection of receivers —Anquan Boldin, Larry Fitzgerald and Bryant Johnson — that made Arizona attractive, knowing that his success in St. Louis came because of wideouts like Holt and Issac Bruce, and his struggles in New York were, in part, due to a lack of receivers.

That’s the reason Warner, originally looking for a longterm deal, signed a one-year contract worth $4 million with the Cardinals.

What Warner will get is a chance to play, competing for the starting job with incumbent Josh McCown. That’s a situation Warner has found himself in his past two stops, battles he felt weren’t fairly decided.

"If the best player is not me, then the best player is not me, and I have to deal with that," Warner said. "I have always believed I can put my talent and skills up against anybody and may the best man win. The hard part is when it’s not a fair competition."

There is irony in the statement. Whatever the circumstances of Warner’s previous two jobs, it’s clear where he stands with the Cardinals, and this time, it is Warner who likely has the advantage.

It will be a shock if Warner doesn’t start the season opener. The NFL certainly thinks so. With the Giants and the Rams slated as the Cards’ first two opponents, Warner will have a chance to show all three teams he has played for that he is right, that he is still the same quarterback.

And maybe, just maybe, he’ll relive some of the same magic he did in 1999.

"I am moving my family, I am buying a home, and I am believing things are going to work out great," Warner said. "The great thing about it is so much of it depends on me.

"I think it’ll be the perfect situation and it will write the perfect ending to the book."


Contact Darren Urban by email, or phone (480) 898-6525
 

HookemCards

Have at you!!!!!
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Posts
1,329
Reaction score
45
Location
Temple, Texas
I think the acquisition of Warner is going to be huge. We have a better OL, and better WR than the Giants, and hopefully with Arrington and Shipp we can come close to there running game. Couple that with an aggressive defense I'm expecting great things this year.

Is it Sept yet????
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
There's some uncertainty with Warner. So too with McCown.

In Warner, we have a field-smart veteran who can read defenses and whose production slipped considerably in the past 2 years - either because of the aftermath of injuries, weak supporting cast, shaken confidence or just plain growing older.

In McCown, we have an athletic youngster who still needs smoothing around the edges, hasn't fully gotten the hang of reading defenses and has a lot more to prove.

Anyone who says he absolutely knows that Kurt will return to his glory days or flop terribly is blowing smoke. Similarly, anyone who feels that this absolutely is McCown's year or conversely that he'll never get to the level we need him to, is blowing equal smoke.

I'm not real big on a lot of talk about "we're gonna." (That's more the MO of the previous regime). We'll see soon enough how things play themselves out on the field. And rather than talk about it, I'm juiced up just watching as things unfold. It sure has been pretty exciting thus far.
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,168
Reaction score
6,015
Location
Verrado
JeffGollin said:

Anyone who says he absolutely knows that Kurt will return to his glory days or flop terribly is blowing smoke. Similarly, anyone who feels that this absolutely is McCown's year or conversely that he'll never get to the level we need him to, is blowing equal smoke.

Why is that blowing 'equal smoke'? How long do you give a guy to develop? Some guys just have 'IT' when comes to being a great QB, personally, I've seen enough of McCown live to see he has SOME skills but in my opinion, doesn't have it all to be a top notch QB in the NFL.
 

Clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
9,016
Reaction score
336
Location
Phoenix, az
blindseyed said:
Why is that blowing 'equal smoke'? How long do you give a guy to develop? Some guys just have 'IT' when comes to being a great QB, personally, I've seen enough of McCown live to see he has SOME skills but in my opinion, doesn't have it all to be a top notch QB in the NFL.


It's equal smoke, because everything you just stated is pure opinion nothing more. No one knows how any player will mature or progress.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,168
Reaction score
5,395
Location
Iowa
JeffGollin said:
There's some uncertainty with Warner. So too with McCown.

In Warner, we have a field-smart veteran who can read defenses and whose production slipped considerably in the past 2 years - either because of the aftermath of injuries, weak supporting cast, shaken confidence or just plain growing older.

In McCown, we have an athletic youngster who still needs smoothing around the edges, hasn't fully gotten the hang of reading defenses and has a lot more to prove.

Anyone who says he absolutely knows that Kurt will return to his glory days or flop terribly is blowing smoke. Similarly, anyone who feels that this absolutely is McCown's year or conversely that he'll never get to the level we need him to, is blowing equal smoke.

I'm not real big on a lot of talk about "we're gonna." (That's more the MO of the previous regime). We'll see soon enough how things play themselves out on the field. And rather than talk about it, I'm juiced up just watching as things unfold. It sure has been pretty exciting thus far.

It is important I think, to point out that Warner had a lot of disadvantages in that horrible 2002 season when he went 0 and 5 as a starter. For one, every game he played was against a top-9 defense at the time, e.g. Philly, Wash, NY Giants, Denver, and Tampa Bay. Also, all but one of those five games were on the road. The Rams offense went downhill fast in the TB game when Faulk was injuried. And lest we forget, that season also brought the Rams the infamous swinging door named John St.Clair at ROT. To say Michael Strahan "schooled" him would be kind. TB was taking turns lining up against him, like school bullies picking on a 98-pound weakling.

One must also understand that Marc Bulger garnered most of his victories that season at home, and all of his wins were against defenses ranked 23rd or worse, excepting Oakland. Oakland did have a poor pass defense that season, and Charles Woodson did not play versus the Rams. Simply put, it was a tale of two categories of opponents. Couple that with Martz suddenly discovered some balance in the offense when Bulger played, and you have a partial explanation for why one quarterback went something 7-0 as a starter, and the other went 0-5.

None of this is to say that Warner was anything close to his 1999-2001 level the last three years. You just have to realize that when ESPN flashes those won-loss records on the screen, that it was injuries, tough defenses, poor playcalling by Martz, the lack of a running game, and a degraded offensive line. If memory serves, none of those losses were blowouts by any means. The 2002 low point was undoubtedly the debacle against Philadelphia, which Warner played with a broken wrist. But if you go back one week, he completed something like 15 consecutive passes versus a good Washington defense, which featured Champ Bailey, Fred Smoot, and Darrell Green at the time.

Long story short, he's a got a decent shot to recapture some of his past glory this year. In the defense-challenged NFC West (excepting Arizona of course), he's got the perfect venue to do it in my view.
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,168
Reaction score
6,015
Location
Verrado
clif said:
It's equal smoke, because everything you just stated is pure opinion nothing more. No one knows how any player will mature or progress.

Everything on the board is opinion...:thumbup:
 

Clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
9,016
Reaction score
336
Location
Phoenix, az
blindseyed said:
Everything on the board is opinion...:thumbup:


I agree and that is why it is "equal smoke" no one knows for sure. Just hope its a fun ride
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
I believe Warner is done and McCown will be starting by game 6 and play better than last year. Can I prove it with stats? No. I saw a lot more upside in McCown than many of you did.

Will McCown ever be a reliable starter? Don't know but he'll get another shot at it this year.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
53,138
Reaction score
5,435
Location
Cold Harbor
Skkorpion said:
I believe Warner is done and McCown will be starting by game 6 and play better than last year. Can I prove it with stats? No. I saw a lot more upside in McCown than many of you did.

Will McCown ever be a reliable starter? Don't know but he'll get another shot at it this year.

Wager?
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,207
Reaction score
1,547
Location
117 and Loving It
Skkorpion said:
I believe Warner is done and McCown will be starting by game 6 and play better than last year.


I believe that children are our future. Teach them well. Let them lead the way.
 

BigRedMO

Registered
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Posts
1,250
Reaction score
12
The best I expect from Warner is an average passer who will manage the offense in an effective way that will deliver 21-28 points a game and will not kill the Cards with fumbles and interceptions. If he can not deliver that the Cards are in trouble because Mccown is not an NFL QB.
 
Last edited:

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I'm not sure how it will work out. The one thing is for sure McCown is an NFL qb making over 1 million per. THere are somewhere around 80 people in the world that can call them seves NFL qb's. Some carry clip boards, some hope for a chance and 32 of them start the season in one of the most pressurised position in all of sports. McCown had his moments and may again. Warner has had some great moments and dreams of them again. Navare just dreams and Lewis is in Europe. Now we have still another kid from the south Pacific who is part of the team.

I think the job is probably Warners to lose. Josh knows he must play way above what he did last year to get the job. Warner has really not played for awhile. After being replaced in New York by the coming of Eli. Now we have seen some older QB's come through our swinging doors including Boomer and his mouth, Mcmahan and his head band, Krieg with his small hands and most recently Blake. Now we turn to a 34 year old named Warner. Many past glorys as have many of our older QB's. Maybe it's time for us fans to get lucky. Maybe it will be Warners time. He sure did look good in the new Unis.

Warner or Josh. Winning or losing. Oldie or newie. Washed up or never good. I guess we hope that Josh has learned from his first full (not really) year. We also hope that Warner is as healthy as he appears happy. We hope that Q, Fritz, Johnson and the rest will get the ball and help the qb win games. Warner or Josh...........Flagstaff.......12 weeks away.

GBR
40
ON Green we trust
 

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
Skkorpion said:
I believe Warner is done and McCown will be starting by game 6 and play better than last year. Can I prove it with stats? No. I saw a lot more upside in McCown than many of you did.

Will McCown ever be a reliable starter? Don't know but he'll get another shot at it this year.

skkorp,

I'm sort of in agreement with you,but perhaps for different reasons.

I agree that Warner will not play as the starter all season long. He'll get dinged at some point and will retreat to the sidelines. But I do believe he will set a winning tone as both a starrter as well as "on the sidelines".

McCown will play the majority of the year......whether it's from game 6 or whenever. He will learn "BIG TIME" from Warner and he will be MUCH MUCH better than he was last year. I too, see the same upside in McCown as you.

AllI know for sure is that we enter 2005 in much better shape at QB than we have in years.........even if it's going to cost us $4MM. Warner is a much better player to spend this kind of money on than Emmitt.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,898
Reaction score
7,160
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
If McCown is our starting QB (which means Warner has either been injured or a failure) then we have no shot at the playoffs. It's strange that so many people want Josh to get another chance when that's the inevitable outcome of his hypothetical promotion.
 
Last edited:

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,168
Reaction score
6,015
Location
Verrado
MaoTosiFanClub said:
If McCown is our starting QB (which means Warner has either been injured or a failure) then we have no shot at the playoffs. It's strange that so many people want Josh to get another chance when that's the inevitable outcome of his hypothetical promotion.

:raccoon:
 

Rats

Somanyfreaks,SofewCircus'
Joined
Sep 28, 2002
Posts
4,075
Reaction score
6
JeffGollin said:
There's some uncertainty with Warner. So too with McCown.

In Warner, we have a field-smart veteran who can read defenses and whose production slipped considerably in the past 2 years - either because of the aftermath of injuries, weak supporting cast, shaken confidence or just plain growing older.

In McCown, we have an athletic youngster who still needs smoothing around the edges, hasn't fully gotten the hang of reading defenses and has a lot more to prove.

Anyone who says he absolutely knows that Kurt will return to his glory days or flop terribly is blowing smoke. Similarly, anyone who feels that this absolutely is McCown's year or conversely that he'll never get to the level we need him to, is blowing equal smoke.

I'm not real big on a lot of talk about "we're gonna." (That's more the MO of the previous regime). We'll see soon enough how things play themselves out on the field. And rather than talk about it, I'm juiced up just watching as things unfold. It sure has been pretty exciting thus far.
Jeff you are exactly right with this analysis and it should also be noted that both of these QB fumble alot so protection will be at a premium for whom ever is under center. Kurt at 85% is better than 8 out of 10 NFL starters...I could live with that for a couple of years. Josh is still learning and played behind dreadful Olines. I think that might have been rectified this season. He still has a chance to be a decent NFL starter or I do not believe DG would have brought him back for this season. He should sit behind Kurt and learn from one of the all time greats. I think we can do great things this season with our Qbs.
 

Rats

Somanyfreaks,SofewCircus'
Joined
Sep 28, 2002
Posts
4,075
Reaction score
6
MaoTosiFanClub said:
If McCown is our starting QB (which means Warner has either been injured or a failure) then we have no shot at the playoffs. It's strange that so many people want Josh to get another chance when that's the inevitable outcome of his hypothetical promotion.
This is completely closed minded and false. We were two wins short of a playoff birth last year in which Josh QBed 11 games. We had several games that could have fell our way had certain things happened on offense and Defense. The Qb is not the only reason we missed the playoffs last season and won't be the only reason we make it or miss it this season. It really is as simple as that.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
53,138
Reaction score
5,435
Location
Cold Harbor
Rats said:
This is completely closed minded and false. We were two wins short of a playoff birth last year in which Josh QBed 11 games. We had several games that could have fell our way had certain things happened on offense and Defense. The Qb is not the only reason we missed the playoffs last season and won't be the only reason we make it or miss it this season. It really is as simple as that.

Here we go again.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
39,835
Reaction score
28,472
I really like Accorsi's comments on Warner. I'm not sure how well Warner will do as a starter, but he's not a Jeff Blake if the wheels come off.
 
Top