This Draft Looks Easy to Me

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,601
Reaction score
38,566
Location
Orlando, FL
While everyone is focused on trying to number how many impact players are in this draft, there’s something worth noting that makes a mistake harder. If most picks have the same likelihood of success, every pick has the same value. There is so little difference between the chance of finding a Pro Bowler at 3 than 12, any pick is the same gamble. The BPAs are in limited value positions; RB & S. The others are need fillers. The Cards just need to find someone who makes the team better. I’d like it if they can try Simpson late in round 1, if they don’t have to sacrifice too much to get him. That’s why 12 & 20 appeals to me. However, if a good trade doesn’t happen I can live with most any choice. There’s an article out there I didn’t bother to link. However, the point is simple. Every top potential pick has a significant flaw. It’s a Popeye draft, “‘ya pays your money and ‘ya takes your chances.”
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,601
Reaction score
38,566
Location
Orlando, FL
Well you were against Love? Now it sounds like your fine with it
I don’t like using pick 3 on an RB even in this mediocre draft. However, if the trade offers are lousy (I doubt it) then problems pop up. It’s also too early for an RT and there are options later. Reese scares me but at least he can play LB. The scout I posted who said Love fits MLF’s offensive scheme made me think that since I didn’t like the other options I could live with Love. This is a hideous draft. Cards’ curse rises again! Sorry if I flip-flopped but I still believe they trade down unless Bailey’s there. That’s 50/50 at best.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,296
Reaction score
13,959
While everyone is focused on trying to number how many impact players are in this draft, there’s something worth noting that makes a mistake harder. If most picks have the same likelihood of success, every pick has the same value. There is so little difference between the chance of finding a Pro Bowler at 3 than 12, any pick is the same gamble. The BPAs are in limited value positions; RB & S. The others are need fillers. The Cards just need to find someone who makes the team better. I’d like it if they can try Simpson late in round 1, if they don’t have to sacrifice too much to get him. That’s why 12 & 20 appeals to me. However, if a good trade doesn’t happen I can live with most any choice. There’s an article out there I didn’t bother to link. However, the point is simple. Every top potential pick has a significant flaw. It’s a Popeye draft, “‘ya pays your money and ‘ya takes your chances.”
It appeals to me too. 12 and 20 isn't close to being enough though.
 

Cardinal88

All Star
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Posts
649
Reaction score
1,116
Location
Phoenix
I know we need a lot of help but I'm not confident that Monti can pick guys that will add value. If Dallas wants number 3, they have to give up 12, 20 and 92 which is about as close as you can get to an even trade. Otherwise, stay where we are and pick either Bailey or Love. Yeah, most likely we will miss out on Simpson but it seems like the overall consensus is that he isn't that special so why waste capital. Take our chances with a QB later. If it doesn't work out, we most likely will be top 5 in the draft next year anyway!.
 

CT Card Fan

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Posts
417
Reaction score
146
Location
South Windsor, CT
It does look easy, we just need to do this;

You must be registered for see images attach
I won't try to speak to the second round and after, but if they trade down I do like the idea of getting the best available guard ahead of the Ravens and then a RT option at 20, wouldn't have to be Proctor necessarily. I'd be fine with a different QB then Simpson, depending on who is available in R2 and maybe take a shot at Allar or someone else a little later.

The possibility of shoring up the O-line finally is appealing though.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2026
Posts
24
Reaction score
84
Location
Yorkshire, England
I'm not sure on what we'll get trading down AND I’m still not entirely sold on Simpson, but given our situation, he’s a risk worth taking with a late first-round pick.

If we pass on him and miss out, the upcoming free-agent QB class looks thin. My fear is that we’ll improve just enough to move out of range for next year's elite prospects, leaving us stuck in neutral after last season's disaster
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,325
Reaction score
3,019
Location
Arizona
I was able to score Love, Simpson, and Iheanafor from ASU in a mock draft sim the other night. Nothing would make me happier than somehow landing all 3 somehow. Extremely unlikely that happens, but that would be the best case scenario IMO.

Of course I’ll see this comment 3 years from now when someone else wound up being way better than those 3 lol
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2026
Posts
24
Reaction score
84
Location
Yorkshire, England
I was able to score Love, Simpson, and Iheanafor from ASU in a mock draft sim the other night. Nothing would make me happier than somehow landing all 3 somehow. Extremely unlikely that happens, but that would be the best case scenario IMO.

Of course I’ll see this comment 3 years from now when someone else wound up being way better than those 3 lol
That would be immense, I've not seen any of Iheanachor, but from what I've read he has tonnes of potential.
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,325
Reaction score
3,019
Location
Arizona
That would be immense, I've not seen any of Iheanachor, but from what I've read he has tonnes of potential.
He impressed at Senior Bowl week. His draft stock soared from 3rd round to late 1st. He’s raw but has potential. I haven’t seen enough of his tape to properly judge myself, but there’s buzz around him for sure.
 

maroon

Newbie
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
45
Reaction score
80
Location
Missouri, USA
My main goal is to avoid going up in the draft or moving down. Take Love, then wait at 34 for Simpson, if he's gone, you draft an OT or Edge whichever and in the 3rd you can get Beck or Nussmeier, whoever you want more. I'd be totally fine with that, Love is franchise changing IMO. He makes everyone better just because the defense has to adjust to him.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,059
Reaction score
42,371
Location
Gilbert, AZ
My main goal is to avoid going up in the draft or moving down. Take Love, then wait at 34 for Simpson, if he's gone, you draft an OT or Edge whichever and in the 3rd you can get Beck or Nussmeier, whoever you want more. I'd be totally fine with that, Love is franchise changing IMO. He makes everyone better just because the defense has to adjust to him.
Definitely don’t want to move up in this draft. I’m fine with moving down.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,410
Reaction score
2,182
Location
117 and Loving It
I don’t like using pick 3 on an RB even in this mediocre draft. However, if the trade offers are lousy (I doubt it) then problems pop up. It’s also too early for an RT and there are options later. Reese scares me but at least he can play LB. The scout I posted who said Love fits MLF’s offensive scheme made me think that since I didn’t like the other options I could live with Love. This is a hideous draft. Cards’ curse rises again! Sorry if I flip-flopped but I still believe they trade down unless Bailey’s there. That’s 50/50 at best.
This was my thought long ago. This is an absolutely horrible draft. The least interesting draft in ages.
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,325
Reaction score
3,019
Location
Arizona
My main goal is to avoid going up in the draft or moving down. Take Love, then wait at 34 for Simpson, if he's gone, you draft an OT or Edge whichever and in the 3rd you can get Beck or Nussmeier, whoever you want more. I'd be totally fine with that, Love is franchise changing IMO. He makes everyone better just because the defense has to adjust to him.
I'd be good with this too. I think highly of Nussmeier.
 
Top