I'd root for cavs simply because Dort is so dirty.okc vs cavs
I'd root for cavs simply because Dort is so dirty.okc vs cavs
OKC all the way.I'd root for cavs simply because Dort is so dirty.
The Brunson move was like a new school Jordan shot to beat the Jazz. More dramatic crossover and a shot from 3 to win the series. Pretty impressive.Brunson is a beast.
Knicks Celtics should be a fun series.
he didn't say him by name but insiders think JJ Redick was clearly talking about Luka when he said the key to next season is them being in better shape. Said some guys were in great shape, others not so much. One of the criticisms and given reasons for Dallas trading Luka was his weight, insiders said his diet after going to LA was horrible and as good as he is on offense they felt his biggest issue on defense is he's so slow now because of his weight. I would personally add I just don't think he tries very hard on defense
Heard his comments on the radio yesterday. Brooks also said if he had an injured foot he'd expect someone to go after it. It is currently within the rules, so why not?Hadn't seen this one before, Dillon Brooks admitted he's trying to hit Curry in the injured thumb.
Dillon Brooks, who was accused of targeting Stephen Curry’s injured thumb during the game, didn’t deny the tactic. Instead, he defended it. “If someone had an injured ankle, I’d go after that,” he said bluntly postgame. Brooks’ unapologetic approach only added fuel to Kerr’s criticism of current rules. He compared Brooks’ behavior to the gritty Detroit Pistons of the 1990s—and made it clear he believes the NBA must act. Still, Kerr admitted that any rule change must pass through the competition committee, leaving coaches stuck for now.
Heard his comments on the radio yesterday. Brooks also said if he had an injured foot he'd expect someone to go after it. It is currently within the rules, so why not?
Because it's garbage. Just play the game, don't try and injure someone who's already playing hurt.
The irony after game 5 Butler said he thought the reason Brooks fouled him on the 3 pointer is Brooks was trying to hit him where his injury was. That Brooks had tried several times earlier in the game and that he thought Dillon tried to do it again and wound up fouling him which basically cost them that game
What Steph said was simple, if it's a foul, call the foul. I'm not asking for special treatment, I'm not asking them to create a rule just for me, but the way certain people close out, he didn't say Brooks by name, it's clear what they're trying to do. If it's a foul call the foul.
I have no problem with playing Steph physically on the ball, he's had a ton of turnovers in this series getting ripped several times by Thompson or VanVleet, he just doesn't have the same level of handle he normally does because of the thumb and it makes perfect sense to go after that. But they're not doing it trying to injure him they're trying to turn him over, that's actually a basketball play, trying to hit his thumb isn't.
Matt Barnes said on his show he would "slap the bleep" out of Brooks if he was playing in the game. He said you can see him grabbing at the thumb all game long, trying to hit it on screens, he said he's actually surprised someone on the Warriors hasn't decked Brooks
Hadn't seen this one before, Dillon Brooks admitted he's trying to hit Curry in the injured thumb.
Dillon Brooks, who was accused of targeting Stephen Curry’s injured thumb during the game, didn’t deny the tactic. Instead, he defended it. “If someone had an injured ankle, I’d go after that,” he said bluntly postgame. Brooks’ unapologetic approach only added fuel to Kerr’s criticism of current rules. He compared Brooks’ behavior to the gritty Detroit Pistons of the 1990s—and made it clear he believes the NBA must act. Still, Kerr admitted that any rule change must pass through the competition committee, leaving coaches stuck for now.
i would literally have a big man come off the bench just to go after brooks' thumbs - and jalen's too - intentionally - that's how i roll
I agree. Where the funk is Draymond. He should have decked Dilldo Brooks by now. Same with crazy Jimmy.
Anyone see the irony in that last paragraph?Because it's garbage. Just play the game, don't try and injure someone who's already playing hurt.
The irony after game 5 Butler said he thought the reason Brooks fouled him on the 3 pointer is Brooks was trying to hit him where his injury was. That Brooks had tried several times earlier in the game and that he thought Dillon tried to do it again and wound up fouling him which basically cost them that game
What Steph said was simple, if it's a foul, call the foul. I'm not asking for special treatment, I'm not asking them to create a rule just for me, but the way certain people close out, he didn't say Brooks by name, it's clear what they're trying to do. If it's a foul call the foul.
I have no problem with playing Steph physically on the ball, he's had a ton of turnovers in this series getting ripped several times by Thompson or VanVleet, he just doesn't have the same level of handle he normally does because of the thumb and it makes perfect sense to go after that. But they're not doing it trying to injure him they're trying to turn him over, that's actually a basketball play, trying to hit his thumb isn't.
Matt Barnes said on his show he would "slap the bleep" out of Brooks if he was playing in the game. He said you can see him grabbing at the thumb all game long, trying to hit it on screens, he said he's actually surprised someone on the Warriors hasn't decked Brooks