az jam
ASFN Icon
I'm confused and see different numbers floated around but what is the cap hit for the Cards if we either trade Kyler or release him this coming off season??
Thanks for your help!!
Thanks for your help!!
It depends on the situation, if and when he’s traded or released.I'm confused and see different numbers floated around but what is the cap hit for the Cards if we either trade Kyler or release him this coming off season??
Thanks for your help!!
Could someone on our Board cover the different situations with actual numbers. That is what I would love to see.It depends on the situation, if and when he’s traded or released.

Maybe you have me on ignore, but this is wrong. Because with Kyler on the roster that hold represents a quarterback.Bottom line: the potential dead money is not any impediment to moving on from Murray, will not limit the Cards at all in the 2026 offseason, and , will provide significant cap space for 2027 and 2028
The 2026 money is spent whether he plays or is released. The savings is in 2027 and 2028. If Kyler is on the roster on March 22.2026, his 19.5M base salary in 2027 is guaranteed. The Cardinals should have an idea of his trade value. My guess it is zero. https://overthecap.com/player/kyler-murray/7792Maybe you have me on ignore, but this is wrong. Because with Kyler on the roster that hold represents a quarterback.
With Kyler cut, the Bidwill family is paying $50 million for him not to play football and invest additional resources in some plan for the future at quarterback.
Their outlook for 2026 without a trade for Kyler, in the fourth year of a rebuild, is awful.
If he’s traded the Cards don’t have to pay that money out. It’s only guaranteed by the team he’s contracted with when the money is due.The 2026 money is spent whether he plays or is released. The savings is in 2027 and 2028. If Kyler is on the roster on March 22.2026, his 19.5M base salary in 2027 is guaranteed. The Cardinals should have an idea of his trade value. My guess it is zero. https://overthecap.com/player/kyler-murray/7792
I don't believe he has any trade value. I am assuming the cardinals tried to trade him and did not get any offers. He is not a $40m Qb.If he’s traded the Cards don’t have to pay that money out. It’s only guaranteed by the team he’s contracted with when the money is due.
The 2027 space is meaningless in March 2026. Cmon.
Obviously you need to plan to accommodate a $35 million cap hit. I think a team will trade for him to just make sure they have him.I don't believe he has any trade value. I am assuming the cardinals tried to trade him and did not get any offers. He is not a $40m Qb.
I don't believe he has any trade value. I am assuming the cardinals tried to trade him and did not get any offers. He is not a $40m Qb.
You’d think that Gannon and Ossenfort would want to keep the lid one some of these stories leaking out to at least keep the fires burning.Someone will take a 2 year flyer and I'm guessing Pittsburgh for some season. No reason, just in my gut.
They usually are very good at this but Murray's agent has been very outspoken in the past.You’d think that Gannon and Ossenfort would want to keep the lid one some of these stories leaking out to at least keep the fires burning.
Maybe you have me on ignore, but this is wrong. Because with Kyler on the roster that hold represents a quarterback
We don’t have much ‘26 cap space as it stands, but we can create a fair amount by creating some additional roster holes.A trade would clearly be preferable and didnt say otherwise.
Worst case if they have to cut him on 3/22 - they will still have sufficient cap room to go execute a productive offseason.
I disagree that '27 and '28 cap space doesnt matter. It is very easy to sign players in '26 and time their cap hits to minimize '26 and push $ into '27 and '28.
Smells like an excuse for job securityWe don’t have much ‘26 cap space as it stands, but we can create a fair amount by creating some additional roster holes.
Cap space three years out is immaterial. You’d obviously rather have a franchise QB; now we will be in years five and six of a rebuild.
Pretty much the only thing coaches and GMs care about. Can’t blame them.Smells like an excuse for job security
yes, I agree with thisWe don’t have much ‘26 cap space as it stands, but we can create a fair amount by creating some additional roster holes.
Cap space three years out is immaterial. You’d obviously rather have a franchise QB; now we will be in years five and six of a rebuild.
It would be unprecedented for the Cards to pay out this much money to a player not on the roster. That’s why I’m skeptical.yes, I agree with this
the point I am really making is that this isnt the Russell Wilson situation that the media has compared this to. Cutting Wilson left the Broncos with far less cap space than had they kept him. Thats a tough dead money hit.
the Cards '26 cap space is basically the same if they keep him or cut him. Trading him is still the best option.
Maybe the cards should scrub their social's of all things Murray.They usually are very good at this but Murray's agent has been very outspoken in the past.