July’s Monthly Juventus Thoughts: No Money, Mo Problems?

ASFN Admin

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 8, 2002
Posts
1,263,801
Reaction score
59
You must be registered for see images attach

TURIN, ITALY - AUGUST 2: Kerim Alajbegovic, Kolo Muani of Juventus departing for Hong Kong on August 2, 2026 in Turin, Italy. (Photo by Daniele Badolato - Juventus FC/Juventus FC via Getty Images) | Juventus FC via Getty Images

We’re less than a month away from the start of the season and next season’s team is slowly but surely starting to take shape. After a slow start, Juventus has loaned out a few of its flops João Mário, though the fact that these were loans and not outright sales suggests that our undesirables are so undesired that… nobody truly desires them.

That said, there was a World Cup this summer, which makes it a little more difficult to conduct regular transfer business. But Juventus has a long way to go to recover from last season’s disappointing end and an even longer way to winning titles again, so time is not exactly on our side. While I’m encouraged by the restructuring happening in the boardroom and management’s office, I’m still hoping for a little more action on the pitch to restore my faith in the Bianconeri’s revival.

Transfer news​


July was a slow month for transfers although the last few days of the month indicated that things might get exciting in August.

You must be registered for see images attach

The Money Tree​


One of the most pervasive stories about Juventus the last few years has been that we are broke. There was a real sense of “woe to us” about how little money we had to spend on new players while the likes of Chelsea, Manchester City, and Barcelona spend the equivalent of the GDP of small countries on overrated new players. The days of splashing the cash on the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo are long gone … right?

Not exactly.

Juventus just spent more than €70 million on two players: Randal Kolo Muani and Kerim Alajbegović, while we also still also had the second-highest wage bill in Italy last season. I will admit that I also briefly bought into the victimhood narrative of Juventus being poor beggars who have been crushed by the ruthless financial juggernauts of (primarily) the Premier League. It seems that we have enough money when we desperately want a player who had a few good months with us (hey Randal!) despite the club winning little silverware the last few years and not making a major sale (yet!) this summer.

Greed​


It has been a pretty wild few months on the global political football stage. We have seen extraordinary levels of political involvement of primarily the U.S. government with FIFA as the line between politics and football has become thinner and thinner, though this level of government involvement in the game is not necessarily unprecedented.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino tried to capitalize on the political power he has amassed during his presidency by announcing a plan to create a commercial subsidiary to run major FIFA competitions (including the World Cup) and allow outside investors to buy shares in this enterprise. After the plan faced an avalanche of criticism from almost everybody within (and even outside of) football, Infantino canceled the idea.

It reminded me of the Super League fiasco from a few years ago when Andrea Agnelli and Co. made a failed attempt to form a coalition of mega clubs that would break away from UEFA. A pattern of excessive hubris from those in power, perhaps?

To go back to the theme of this review, I am fascinated by the continued attempts of the heads of footballing institutions to both find new ways to simultaneously create (new competitions left, right, and center) new sources of revenue and extract (Infantino’s plan) money out of the game and into private hands. Which begs the question … why?

Does football not generate enough revenue? Surely not, given the billions in revenue generated from spectacles like the World Cup and the UEFA Champions League. FIFA claims that it distributes the majority of its revenue to member associations or reinvests it into its development programs, so we should all be sharing in the riches of the game.

I’m encouraged by the fact that both the plans for the Super League and the FIFA Ponzi Scheme collapsed (at least temporarily) under the pressure of people power. Will it be enough to maintain our ability to love and enjoy the game the way we have for so many years and across so many generations?

Continue reading...
 
Top