Jacoby Brissett wants extension that pays as a starter

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,730
Reaction score
82,880
I think that the Cards should take Love/Bailey or trade down. Some thought trading down for the Anderson/Johnson trade was the wrong call. Hindsight proved that correct of course, but that doesn't necessarily mean that's the case this year.
The people who thought it was the wrong call had FORESIGHT and it wasn't hindsight that proved them right, it was the results of the trade that did.
If prioritizing winning means most, we all chose the wrong franchise to support.
this is is undoubtedly true... except, I'd argue for most of us, it's not really a choice. it's an addiction, due to where we're born and raised. Those that CHOSE to be a fan of this team should seek psychiatric help.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,374
Reaction score
56,246
Location
Colorado
I think that the Cards should take Love/Bailey or trade down. Some thought trading down for the Anderson/Johnson trade was the wrong call. Hindsight proved that correct of course, but that doesn't necessarily mean that's the case this year.

If prioritizing winning means most, we all chose the wrong franchise to support.
This is where I have hopium, that this franchise will change.
 

602 Native

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
5,989
Reaction score
11,039
Location
Gilbert
No, it doesn't.
The NFL are the only ones that will kick the PV Hillbillies to the curb.

Outside of that it is never happening.

Plus Phoenix just allowed them to buy the land for the next stadium when they leave Glendale.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,296
Reaction score
13,959
The people who thought it was the wrong call had FORESIGHT and it wasn't hindsight that proved them right, it was the results of the trade that did.
We've had this discussion before so I'll let it be.
this is is undoubtedly true... except, I'd argue for most of us, it's not really a choice. it's an addiction, due to where we're born and raised. Those that CHOSE to be a fan of this team should seek psychiatric help.
1000%
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,977
Reaction score
24,695
Location
Modesto, California
Nothing that you said equates to working “longer.” You want to argue putting his body on the line, that has some legs, but this is football. They all do that. Doing it for 3 hours per week more than the backup isn’t crazy. And by your logic every time a starter goes down with injury the backup should then get to have his contract torn up and get a raise equivalent to a starters. That’s not how sports works and that’s not how good businesses are run. You pay for value based on facts and circumstances.
well yeah...working longer.
a backup QB usually gets to watch the game from the bench.
a starting QB has to go out on the field and actually play in the game...every single week too!
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,977
Reaction score
24,695
Location
Modesto, California
If he is asking to be paid like the average QB, that’s too much but if he wants to hit the bottom 20% that’s realistic. The Cards have a rep among players for being cheap. They can afford to make this gesture. They need to start changing their image.
Thats my position. we got the money. Pay the man for one year...let him secure his retirement plan... it aint gonna hurt the team at all. not like they were gonna trade for Burrow or Parsons or something.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,977
Reaction score
24,695
Location
Modesto, California
You are about to enter the Twilight Zone, a 5th dimension beyond human knowledge
You unlock this door with a key of imagination. Another dimension of sound, sight and mind:
It's the Az cardinal's 2026 season. Jacoby Brissett's garbage time stats are now real. MHJ is the WR1 everyone expected. Wilson and McBride continue to improve, and we have the best running offense in the NFL. The defensive line is a run stuffing powerhouse and averaging 10 sacks a game...

Ok, even I started laughing while making this up....lolololol
dude, you totally had me sucked in until I got to the sacks.....
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
70,634
Reaction score
69,526
Location
SoCal
Okay, change it to working "harder." Is that easier?

And no, if a player goes down and the backup comes in, you don't tear up the contract, that's part of next-man-up. But if that starter is now gone and the terms of the arrangement are significantly different, yes, it's time to look at their contract differently and reward them for the more difficult work, or putting their body on the line.
Yeah that argument holds no water to me. Brissett got the job by default. Doesn’t matter if it’s due to injury or tanking. To pretend otherwise is just fooling yourself. He’s the same guy.

And if a guy has to work harder now, he’s not a guy you should want on your team.

Honestly, all the arguments that he SHOULD get a raise like a starting QB kinda suck.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
79,630
Reaction score
35,170
Location
Killjoy Central
Yeah that argument holds no water to me. Brissett got the job by default. Doesn’t matter if it’s due to injury or tanking. To pretend otherwise is just fooling yourself. He’s the same guy.

And if a guy has to work harder now, he’s not a guy you should want on your team.

Honestly, all the arguments that he SHOULD get a raise like a starting QB kinda suck.
Very true. It's a Next Man Up mentality. How many RBs did we go through last season? Each one that stepped up to fill in the gap once our starting RB went down was not suddenly paid "starting RB wages" despite them being named the starter...
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,065
Reaction score
42,384
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yeah that argument holds no water to me. Brissett got the job by default. Doesn’t matter if it’s due to injury or tanking. To pretend otherwise is just fooling yourself. He’s the same guy.

And if a guy has to work harder now, he’s not a guy you should want on your team.

Honestly, all the arguments that he SHOULD get a raise like a starting QB kinda suck.
I think Brissett pretty clearly took the job from Kyler man.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,411
Reaction score
12,864
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Very true. It's a Next Man Up mentality. How many RBs did we go through last season? Each one that stepped up to fill in the gap once our starting RB went down was not suddenly paid "starting RB wages" despite them being named the starter...
It's "next man up" in season. Never did I advocate he get a raise mid-season, but when the terms of your work agreement change so dramatically, it's time to ask for a raise.

For example, years back I was given a promotion when my boss moved into a different role. It came with an okay pay bump, but the terms of what I would be doing weren't all that different than they'd been in my more junior role, I'd just be supervising some people now. Three months in, some disconnected VP decided that all of our roles needed to be integrated and combined with another department. Suddenly I was expected to learn an entirely new job on top of my new promotion. And because I was such a "rockstar," they gave me our biggest and most stressful market, and told me how great of an opportunity it was for my career. I asked not to do it. They said do it or quit.

So I walked. Simple enough, this wasn't the job I signed up for, and the pay wasn't commensurate. Even if it was, my mental health couldn't handle it (like Jacoby's physical health). That's why he deserves to get paid.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
79,630
Reaction score
35,170
Location
Killjoy Central
It's "next man up" in season. Never did I advocate he get a raise mid-season, but when the terms of your work agreement change so dramatically, it's time to ask for a raise.

For example, years back I was given a promotion when my boss moved into a different role. It came with an okay pay bump, but the terms of what I would be doing weren't all that different than they'd been in my more junior role, I'd just be supervising some people now. Three months in, some disconnected VP decided that all of our roles needed to be integrated and combined with another department. Suddenly I was expected to learn an entirely new job on top of my new promotion. And because I was such a "rockstar," they gave me our biggest and most stressful market, and told me how great of an opportunity it was for my career. I asked not to do it. They said do it or quit.

So I walked. Simple enough, this wasn't the job I signed up for, and the pay wasn't commensurate. Even if it was, my mental health couldn't handle it (like Jacoby's physical health). That's why he deserves to get paid.
It isn't even known if he will start, how many games he might start, etc. Not paying a guy full starter salary if a QB is picked in the draft because that instantly reduces his role on the team. JB would be a temp starter then back to backing up a rookie, for example.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,694
Reaction score
48,826
Location
UK
Just to be clear. If the Cards said "Screw you JB, we'll start the Mississippi Mustache" then he too would be asking for a raise to start.

You can have two QBs on backup money and no starter, one of them needs a pay rise.
 

602 Native

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
5,989
Reaction score
11,039
Location
Gilbert
Just to be clear. If the Cards said "Screw you JB, we'll start the Mississippi Mustache" then he too would be asking for a raise to start.

You can have two QBs on backup money and no starter, one of them needs a pay rise.
The Cards are the only team not to get that.

What happens if they draft Simpson? Will they cut JB or trade him?

Your scenario above still has to be resolved. What a fine mess the Cards have created.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,341
Reaction score
19,076
Location
Chandler, Az
Honestly, all the arguments that he SHOULD get a raise like a starting QB kinda suck.

At work I had my supervisor retire and they had me fill in until they found her replacement. Eventually after a couple of months they decided to just keep me in the position. I said sure but I'm not doing it without a promotion which they eventually gave to me.

Jacoby's contract was originally for him to be a backup who comes off the bench occasionally as needed. If the Cardinals are now expecting him to begin the season as a starter, I fully understand why he would want to renegotiate that deal. The amount of stress and the physical beating you take as a starting NFL QB warrant a higher pay.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,411
Reaction score
12,864
Location
Las Vegas, NV
It isn't even known if he will start, how many games he might start, etc. Not paying a guy full starter salary if a QB is picked in the draft because that instantly reduces his role on the team. JB would be a temp starter then back to backing up a rookie, for example.
Sure, and no deal needs to be made today. But the Cardinals literally came out and called JB the starter. If we draft Simpson, it's potentially a different story. If we don't draft anyone until the 3rd or 4th, JB needs a pay raise, IMO.

I don't understand the frustration with this. It's not like it's our money and it's not like giving him a few million more for one season is going to prevent us from signing some marquee free agent, or having to cut everyone. We have the cap space.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
8,400
Reaction score
11,363
Location
North of the 49th.
Very true. It's a Next Man Up mentality. How many RBs did we go through last season? Each one that stepped up to fill in the gap once our starting RB went down was not suddenly paid "starting RB wages" despite them being named the starter...

You're a Director and are asked to do a VP's job for three months due to his/her absence. After three months, the VP informs the company that a health emergency will prevent a return for up to a year. You're informed that you will continue managing the VP function in the interim. Despite having an existing contract for services to be rendered as a Director, wouldn't you think that this agreement should be revised to better reflect your additional responsibilities?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,065
Reaction score
42,384
Location
Gilbert, AZ
At work I had my supervisor retire and they had me fill in until they found her replacement. Eventually after a couple of months they decided to just keep me in the position. I said sure but I'm not doing it without a promotion which they eventually gave to me.

Jacoby's contract was originally for him to be a backup who comes off the bench occasionally as needed. If the Cardinals are now expecting him to begin the season as a starter, I fully understand why he would want to renegotiate that deal. The amount of stress and the physical beating you take as a starting NFL QB warrant a higher pay.
Also it sounds like Brissett wants to have the conversation.

There’s a gap in veteran QB contracts today. 16 veterans are getting $40MM+ AAV and everyone else is making less than $10 million. Only outlier is Malik Willis.

I’m sure if you move Brissett into the $12MM range and guarantee it, everyone feels good.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,333,158
Posts
6,547,601
Members
6,431
Latest member
Arlene Lake
Top