Inactive List

Garthshort

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
10,180
Reaction score
7,014
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Has there been any mention of who the "early" inactives are? Of the seven, besides Parsons, I'm guessing:

1. Bell (easy)
2. Scobey
3. Rogers
4. McAddley
5. Goss
6. Young
7. Lucas, if he can't go. And if he can then either Harris or Johnson. JMO.
 

arthurracoon

The Cardinal Smiles
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Posts
16,534
Reaction score
1
Location
Nashville
Originally posted by Garthshort
Has there been any mention of who the "early" inactives are? Of the seven, besides Parsons, I'm guessing:

1. Bell (easy)
2. Scobey
3. Rogers
4. McAddley
5. Goss
6. Young
7. Lucas, if he can't go. And if he can then either Harris or Johnson. JMO.

Lucas was cleared to play on Thursday. He had been practicing almost all week.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Lucas was cleared to play on Thursday. He had been practicing almost all week.
He rolled his ankle during practice and is questionable again.
 

arthurracoon

The Cardinal Smiles
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Posts
16,534
Reaction score
1
Location
Nashville
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Lucas was cleared to play on Thursday. He had been practicing almost all week.
He rolled his ankle during practice and is questionable again.

Dang.

:thumbdown
 

pinnacle

Registered User
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Posts
2,911
Reaction score
1
Location
arizona
#7...at training camp harris seemed to be an a starter on punt and kick coverage..I think he and lucas could dress (lucas will probably not be 100%)...I guess banks could be inactive.

I think they almost have to have johnson dress as king will be mostly a tackle due to bells injury.

rogers or wells..might be wells - Rogers played better in the preseason games.

the inactive list is the silliest thing around. they should do away with it.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
G

Garthshort

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
10,180
Reaction score
7,014
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Pinnacle, I agree100%. Does anyone know what the purpose of it is? It doesn't seem to save the teams money and IMO all it does is keep teams from putting their best teams on the field since not all 53 players can dress.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,470,568
Posts
6,710,940
Members
6,438
Latest member
NamasteDave
Top