- Joined
- May 8, 2002
- Posts
- 436,298
- Reaction score
- 44
Apr. 16—***
The July 1 date for a revenue-sharing model to potentially take effect in college athletics is fast approaching, and U.S. District Judge has yet to fully sign off on it.
The latest holdup in the landmark House v. NCAA case is over imposing roster limits. That came after a April 7 hearing, where Wilken declined to grant final approval.
What a revenue-sharing model could mean in women's college basketball is a subject fourth-year Illinois coach is paying close attention to.
Especially with a per-school salary cap where Division I schools would pay athletes directly for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — starting at $20.5 million — among the major pillars of the House v. NCAA settlement.
"A lot of it is just uncertain, right," Green said. "We have never been through this. So, it's obviously ... it changes the landscape. The landscape has changed the past year, past couple years with NIL. You guys are all seeing this and feeling this. So how does rev share, you know, affect us? Some of it we're going to have to wait and find out, but obviously, it could also help us and be a great thing for our program and our players will be getting an amount that will be great for them, and they can continue to be successful with that. So I just think that's there's a lot left to be figured out. I think we're going to find out a lot this first year if this gets passed and we go into rev share."
Continue reading...
The July 1 date for a revenue-sharing model to potentially take effect in college athletics is fast approaching, and U.S. District Judge has yet to fully sign off on it.
The latest holdup in the landmark House v. NCAA case is over imposing roster limits. That came after a April 7 hearing, where Wilken declined to grant final approval.
What a revenue-sharing model could mean in women's college basketball is a subject fourth-year Illinois coach is paying close attention to.
Especially with a per-school salary cap where Division I schools would pay athletes directly for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — starting at $20.5 million — among the major pillars of the House v. NCAA settlement.
"A lot of it is just uncertain, right," Green said. "We have never been through this. So, it's obviously ... it changes the landscape. The landscape has changed the past year, past couple years with NIL. You guys are all seeing this and feeling this. So how does rev share, you know, affect us? Some of it we're going to have to wait and find out, but obviously, it could also help us and be a great thing for our program and our players will be getting an amount that will be great for them, and they can continue to be successful with that. So I just think that's there's a lot left to be figured out. I think we're going to find out a lot this first year if this gets passed and we go into rev share."
Continue reading...
