Detroit Tigers pitcher explains why MLB’s new salary cap proposal is ‘not good for players’

ASFN Admin

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 8, 2002
Posts
1,128,881
Reaction score
59
You must be registered for see images attach

Photo by Nic Antaya/Getty Images

A Detroit Tigers pitcher has made it clear that MLB’s proposed hard salary cap would be bad news for players across the league.

The reaction matters because this is not just another small CBA disagreement. A hard cap would change the way baseball salaries are negotiated, how stars reach their true market value, and how much spending freedom teams actually have.

That is why players are already pushing back. For them, the issue is not only about one proposal, but about protecting the uncapped structure baseball has fought to keep for decades.

You must be registered for see images attach

Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Tarik Skubal says MLB salary cap proposal is bad for Detroit Tigers players and everyone else​


In a recent Jesse Rogers X post, Skubal explained why he believes players in other major sports would rather have MLB’s current CBA structure.

“It’s not good for players. If you ask any other player in any other union, in the other major sports, they would agree, and they would want our CBA structure,” Skubal said.

Skubal’s stance makes sense because he has just lived the power of baseball’s current system. He won a record-setting arbitration case for 2026, with a panel accepting his $32 million filing, making him one of the highest-paid pitchers in the sport before free agency.

A hard cap would make that type of salary growth harder to protect over time. Even if owners include a payroll floor, players are worried the ceiling would eventually become the real story.

Tarik Skubal sees MLB’s hard cap fight as bigger than Detroit Tigers payroll​


The owners’ proposal reportedly includes a $245.3 million cap ceiling and a $171.2 million floor for 2027, built around a wider attempt to reshape baseball’s economics.

On paper, the floor could force low-spending teams to invest more. But the cap would also limit bidding from big spenders, which is exactly what drives the top of the free-agent and arbitration markets.

That is why the MLBPA has treated the proposal as a major labor warning. The last explicit owner push for a firm cap came before the 1994-95 strike, which canceled the World Series and remains baseball’s clearest labor scar.

For Skubal, the point is simple. MLB players have a system other athletes would want because it does not place a fixed lid on what the market can pay them. If owners get that ceiling now, players fear the system will only get tighter later.

Read more:


Continue reading...
 

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,331,175
Posts
6,545,280
Members
6,431
Latest member
Arlene Lake
Top