The 2007 Offensive Line

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Time to play the Hypothetical " You Be The Coach" game.

It's the weekend of the opener against San Francisco. Who's your starting Offensive Line? Your depth chart?

I'm interested in seeing some of the responses and how it actually winds up unfollding.

Here's my Oline.. For what it's worth.

LT-- Levi Brown
RT -- Reggie Wells
C -- Nick Leckey
RG -- Deuce Lutui
LG -- Milford Brown

Bench

Al Johnson
Mike Gandy
Brandon Gorin
Free Agent pickup (someone of the veteran, lower priced variety)

Cut

Oliver Ross
Elton Brown
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,483
Reaction score
5,744
Location
Nashville TN.
Ditto on your line and your cuts. If Johnson beats out Lecky so be it but I am not sure he will in a fair competition.
 

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
I'm seriously thinking that Ross is going to be given the upper hand in starting, so:

Brown-Brown-Johnson-Lutui-Ross
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,207
Reaction score
1,547
Location
117 and Loving It
LT-- Levi Brown
LG -- Milford Brown
C -- Al Johnson
RG -- Deuce Lutui
RT -- Oliver Ross

Bench

Nick Leckey
Mike Gandy
Brandon Gorin
Reggie Wells

Cut

Elton Brown May be kept if we don't carry three QB?
 
Last edited:

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
LT-- Levi Brown
LG -- Milford Brown
C -- Al Johnson
RG -- Deuce Lutui
RT -- Oliver Ross

Bench

Nick Leckey
Mike Gandy
Brandon Gorin

Cut

Elton Brown May be kept if we don't carry three QB?

Where's Wells?

I would like to get another OL but the only one with value now is Doug Free but he will not be there in Round 5. So instead of reaching go get Bain and Nordin and pick up another O-lineman after June 1st.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,207
Reaction score
1,547
Location
117 and Loving It
Where's Wells?

I would like to get another OL but the only one with value now is Doug Free but he will not be there in Round 5. So instead of reaching go get Bain and Nordin and pick up another O-lineman after June 1st.

Ooops, Wells is on my bench.
 
OP
OP
Diamondback Jay

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Where's Wells?

I would like to get another OL but the only one with value now is Doug Free but he will not be there in Round 5. So instead of reaching go get Bain and Nordin and pick up another O-lineman after June 1st.

I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but I'd take a late round flier on Allen Barbre of Missouri State or Manuel Ramirez of Texas Tech.

Ramirez is more of a ready now player, but Barbre's got that long term potential to be very, very good.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,207
Reaction score
1,547
Location
117 and Loving It
I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but I'd take a late round flier on Allen Barbre of Missouri State or Manuel Ramirez of Texas Tech.

Ramirez is more of a ready now player, but Barbre's got that long term potential to be very, very good.



You aren't the only one...I'd LOVE to draft this kid...he's going to stick in the NFL and is the kind of guy who is on a championship team and people say...he was an UDFA??? or he was a 7th rounder????

I really like that guy.
 
OP
OP
Diamondback Jay

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
You aren't the only one...I'd LOVE to draft this kid...he's going to stick in the NFL and is the kind of guy who is on a championship team and people say...he was an UDFA??? or he was a 7th rounder????

I really like that guy.

Me too. He can play both guard and tackle, and if nothing else, gives them depth. I think if he can be had in the 7th, jump all over him and wait for the development.
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,973
Reaction score
2,674
I agree with Levi at RT. Although I wouldn't mind if he is at LT.

LT: Reggie Wells
LG: Milford Brown
C: Al Johnson
RG: Duece Lutui
RT: Levi Brown

That's the line up I hope for.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I'm probably the only one here who feels this way, but I'd take a late round flier on Allen Barbre of Missouri State or Manuel Ramirez of Texas Tech.

Ramirez is more of a ready now player, but Barbre's got that long term potential to be very, very good.


Barbre would be great in pass pro with his quick feet but, I don't like the fact that he doesn't have adequate strength and the lack of competition he faced, he is exactly like an OT we have now named Reggie Wells. I like Ramirez but he is only 6'2 so he probably wouldn't hold up at OT.

Some guys I seen in the draft guide that I like are:
Doug Free of course, Renardo Foster, Corey Hilliard, Chase Johnson, Dan Parrish, Mike Otto (Purdue guys seem to hold their own), and Kyle Tatum.

Free, Hilliard, and Foster are my preference.
 

Heucrazy

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
9,314
Reaction score
4,781
Location
Reno, NV
The line should be:

LT Levi Brown
LG Milford Brown
C Al Johnson
RG Deuce Lutui
RT Reggie Wells

Anything else would be complete stupidity on the coachs part, IMO.
 

HooverDam

Registered User
Joined
May 21, 2005
Posts
6,560
Reaction score
0
The line should be:

LT Levi Brown
LG Milford Brown
C Al Johnson
RG Deuce Lutui
RT Reggie Wells

Anything else would be complete stupidity on the coachs part, IMO.

The coaches who spend hundreds of hours with the players analyzing their moves would be stupid not to follow what you've come up with from your arm chair?
 
OP
OP
Diamondback Jay

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
The line should be:

LT Levi Brown
LG Milford Brown
C Al Johnson
RG Deuce Lutui
RT Reggie Wells

Anything else would be complete stupidity on the coachs part, IMO.

Right now, I'd say Johnson- Leckey is a toss up.

Assuming this is your preference, what sways you about Johnson that he should start? Just stirring discussion here, not saying I agree or disagree one way or the other.
 

Heucrazy

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
9,314
Reaction score
4,781
Location
Reno, NV
The coaches who spend hundreds of hours with the players analyzing their moves would be stupid not to follow what you've come up with from your arm chair?

Wow that whole "IMO" thing I threw in there, flew right over your head didn't it?

And yes it would be pretty lame of them to completly mess with the line that showed vast improvement the second half of last year.
 
OP
OP
Diamondback Jay

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
I also have a huge amount of concern that the coaching staff has it set in their mind that Wells is better suited for guard.

Listening to the broadcast on KTAR today at the stadium, I heard both Wolf and Ash claim that this pick of Levi can allow the Cards to "move Wells to his best position, guard".

So barring the Cardinals live by this mindset, who's going to be the odd man out? Milford was a stable and steady force, dare I say, the best Olineman on the roster last year. Wells is too good as a tackle and is just starting to show what he's capable of to shift to the bench. Deuce has as much upside as any Olineman currently on the roster not named Levi Brown.

I hate to be arm chair quarterback, but the good tidings of this pick are going right in to the flush if they've got Oliver Ross or Brandon Gorin lined up across from him as starter. Lutui's I guess servicable at tackle, but he's much, much beter suited for guard. Same with Milford. Really, logic says the only of the three who's capable of making the shift is Wells. Why fiix what's not broken?
 
Last edited:

Heucrazy

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
9,314
Reaction score
4,781
Location
Reno, NV
Right now, I'd say Johnson- Leckey is a toss up.

Assuming this is your preference, what sways you about Johnson that he should start? Just stirring discussion here, not saying I agree or disagree one way or the other.

He snaps higher than Leckey, so Matt wouldn't have to bend over to get the ball so much. That's the only reason I have him in there.

I would be very happy if the coaches left the line that played well together alone and just swapped Big for Levi.
 
OP
OP
Diamondback Jay

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
He snaps higher than Leckey, so Matt wouldn't have to bend over to get the ball so much. That's the only reason I have him in there.

I would be very happy if the coaches left the line that played well together alone and just swapped Big for Levi.

Good reasoning. I also think Al is going to have a real chip on his shoulder and something to prove.

When the Cards first signed him, I stated I felt that he could be one of those signings that winds up being better than the amount of press it got.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,207
Reaction score
1,547
Location
117 and Loving It
He snaps higher than Leckey, so Matt wouldn't have to bend over to get the ball so much. That's the only reason I have him in there.

I would be very happy if the coaches left the line that played well together alone and just swapped Big for Levi.

That alone is a HUGE reason...Matt having to bend so low to get into snap position likely throws off natural rhythm...it causes him to pull back into a drop slower than he'd probably like and it is hell oh his knees.

I like Leckey's game, but I don't like his stance. Al Johnson is much higher, and though it seems trivial, I think it will make a world of difference ESPECIALLY in quick snap drop pass scenarios.

Leckey is a nice backup, but Johnson will start because of the rhythm he and matt will have, and also because he's a pretty solid center who only lost his gig in Dallas because of injury.
 

CtCardinals78

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Posts
7,256
Reaction score
2
I would still love to see a deal get done with Fanaca in some way shape or form. Grimm and Whiz are high on Ross so I think we are stuck with him.

W/o Fanaca

LT Ross
LG Wells
C Johnson
RG Lutui
RT L. Brown

Better than what is was last year.

With Fanaca

LT L. Brown
LG. Fanaca
C. Johnson
RG Lutui
RT Wells

Now that is a sick Oline and would feel much more comfortable with that lineup. With or w/o Fanaca I hope Whiz, Grimm come the the realization that A) Ross sucks and B) Wells best serves this team as RT.
 

Doc Cardinal

Old Fart
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Posts
1,807
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
I'd rather see Brown and Brown on the left side....that side would maul some people in the running game.

For RT I'd let the others fight it out....Gandy/Gorin/Wells/Ross etc.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,618
Reaction score
2,534
Location
ASFN
This is the lineup I want to see.

LT Reggie Wells
LG Milford Brown
C Nick Lecky
RG Deuce Lutui
RT Levi Brown

Wells at LT to face the smaller quicker DEs.

All the hoopla about Leckys snapping too low is crazy. If this was a true problem, the coaching staff would change his stance. I would say it has more to do with both players being young & nervous(mostly Leinart).
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
667,388
Posts
5,629,871
Members
6,358
Latest member
angel_ofthe_south
Top