- Joined
- May 8, 2002
- Posts
- 1,172,117
- Reaction score
- 59
On paper, the golf ball rollback is still alive, but after Wednesday morning at Shinnecock Hills, it feels less certain than it did a day earlier.
On the eve of the first round of the 2026 U.S. Open, the USGA, R&A, PGA Tour and DP World Tour jointly announced that there will be no change to the Overall Distance Standard (ODS) testing approach until January 2030. The 2028 date for elite golfers to start using distance-reducing balls is off the table.
"Like most formal feedback sessions, this certainly wasn't unanimous, but it was clear that the industry certainly preferred a single date implementation of January 2030," said Mike Whan, the CEO of the USGA.
However, the larger rollback conversation is not. The governing bodies still believe elite distance needs to be addressed. The tours, according to Mike Whan, the CEO of the USGA, now acknowledge that distance is increasing at the highest level and that golf risks becoming too one-dimensional.
Whan described recent conversations with PGA Tour leadership, DP World Tour leadership and the PGA Tour Player Advisory Council as different from anything he had experienced in five years.
"In my five years of this job, I haven't had those meetings until recently."
That was revealing, and it sounds like progress, until the obvious question dawns on you: Where were these conversations over the last five years?
The USGA and R&A have studied distance for decades and, in March 2023, proposed a Model Local Rule that would allow elite competitions to require reduced-distance golf balls. In December 2023, the game’s governing bodies pivoted after getting feedback that golfers using one set of rules was seen as a critical aspect of the game, so they announced plans to change the way golf balls are tested for everyone.
Now, only in the past few months, have the most meaningful discussions with the tours and elite players apparently taken place? It feels like golf went down one path for years, reached a fork and admitted critical things were unresolved and everything needed to be reconsidered.
One of the biggest challenges the USGA and R&A clearly could not overcome before Wednesday was getting golf’s alphabet soup of organizations to align their motivations.
That is the dilemma. The governing bodies are trying to protect the game’s future. The tours are trying to protect their product. The PGA of America is trying to protect ordinary golfers. Manufacturers are protecting businesses. Players are protecting livelihoods.
Everybody can be right from where they sit, and the answer can still be a mess.
One of Whan’s most important phrases Wednesday was “small digestible bite.” That is how he described the ODS change as it has been proposed. Once the governing bodies moved away from an elite-only Model Local Rule approach and toward a change that would apply across the game, the effect had to be small enough that recreational golfers would not be meaningfully affected. That also meant the changes at the elite level would be smaller.
That is the box the USGA and R&A are in right now. They say distance is a problem, and they have data to back up the claim, but a meaningful solution that does not hurt weekend players is tough to find if everyone plays with the same clubs and balls. Whan hinted, an hour into the press conference, that could change when he said, “I think a simpler, more narrow solution is exactly what we’re going to spend time looking at. I think the alternative to what’s on the table for 2030, things that we’re going to look at together as a group are simpler, more narrow solutions.”
That could mean changes to drivers, changes to golf balls, changes to course setups, and, maybe that the Model Local Rule solution could be back on the table.
Yes, it was an idea that was discarded a few years ago and the concept of everyone playing golf using the same equipment and the same rules is a foundation of the sport. It has always been one of golf’s charms, but in the distance debate, that tradition may be the obstacle. Golf is trying to solve an elite-level problem without touching the recreational game. That may not be possible under one equipment standard, at least not cleanly.
An elite-only rule, whether through a competition ball, Model Local Rule or some other narrow mechanism, has been treated for years as a last resort. "Golf" does not like it and many stakeholders have rejected it, but if you are serious about wanting to reduce distance at the highest level while having no effect on recreational golfers, then some form of narrower solution may be the cleanest available answer.
The reset announced Wednesday buys time for the USGA and R&A, which is ironic because many would argue they’ve had plenty. But it also sounds like more people and perspectives now want a say in the discussions. That is good, but Wednesday also made clear that golf does not yet know exactly what the solution will be.
For now, the game has stepped away from the cliff of a potentially ineffective solution, and a larger debate is starting. The frustrating part is that it took this long for everyone to start looking down.
David Dusek is a senior writer at Golfweek covering golf equipment.
This article originally appeared on Golfweek: USGA golf ball rollback reset raises bigger questions
Continue reading...
On the eve of the first round of the 2026 U.S. Open, the USGA, R&A, PGA Tour and DP World Tour jointly announced that there will be no change to the Overall Distance Standard (ODS) testing approach until January 2030. The 2028 date for elite golfers to start using distance-reducing balls is off the table.
"Like most formal feedback sessions, this certainly wasn't unanimous, but it was clear that the industry certainly preferred a single date implementation of January 2030," said Mike Whan, the CEO of the USGA.
You must be registered for see images attach
However, the larger rollback conversation is not. The governing bodies still believe elite distance needs to be addressed. The tours, according to Mike Whan, the CEO of the USGA, now acknowledge that distance is increasing at the highest level and that golf risks becoming too one-dimensional.
Whan described recent conversations with PGA Tour leadership, DP World Tour leadership and the PGA Tour Player Advisory Council as different from anything he had experienced in five years.
"In my five years of this job, I haven't had those meetings until recently."
That was revealing, and it sounds like progress, until the obvious question dawns on you: Where were these conversations over the last five years?
You must be registered for see images attach
The USGA and R&A have studied distance for decades and, in March 2023, proposed a Model Local Rule that would allow elite competitions to require reduced-distance golf balls. In December 2023, the game’s governing bodies pivoted after getting feedback that golfers using one set of rules was seen as a critical aspect of the game, so they announced plans to change the way golf balls are tested for everyone.
Now, only in the past few months, have the most meaningful discussions with the tours and elite players apparently taken place? It feels like golf went down one path for years, reached a fork and admitted critical things were unresolved and everything needed to be reconsidered.
One of the biggest challenges the USGA and R&A clearly could not overcome before Wednesday was getting golf’s alphabet soup of organizations to align their motivations.
- The USGA and R&A are thinking about the game’s overall health: preserving shot values and protecting historically significant courses while reducing the economic and environmental pressure created when courses stretch farther.
- The PGA Tour operates from a different place. The Tour is in the entertainment business. Eagles, birdies, 350-yard drives and viral highlights are good for television, social media and sponsorship. Distance helps create those moments, and players who have worked their entire lives to reach the Tour have little motivation to see changes made that could reduce one of their greatest advantages.
- The PGA of America has its own balancing act. It runs one of the four men’s majors and the Ryder Cup, the biggest team event in golf. But it also represents club professionals, teachers and everyday golfers who already think they do not hit it far enough.
- Then there is the recreational game itself, which is not broken. There is no distance crisis for new golfers, junior golfers, senior golfers or weekend players trying to find more fairways. Recreational golf is thriving. No one with sense wants to mess that up.
That is the dilemma. The governing bodies are trying to protect the game’s future. The tours are trying to protect their product. The PGA of America is trying to protect ordinary golfers. Manufacturers are protecting businesses. Players are protecting livelihoods.
Everybody can be right from where they sit, and the answer can still be a mess.
One of Whan’s most important phrases Wednesday was “small digestible bite.” That is how he described the ODS change as it has been proposed. Once the governing bodies moved away from an elite-only Model Local Rule approach and toward a change that would apply across the game, the effect had to be small enough that recreational golfers would not be meaningfully affected. That also meant the changes at the elite level would be smaller.
That is the box the USGA and R&A are in right now. They say distance is a problem, and they have data to back up the claim, but a meaningful solution that does not hurt weekend players is tough to find if everyone plays with the same clubs and balls. Whan hinted, an hour into the press conference, that could change when he said, “I think a simpler, more narrow solution is exactly what we’re going to spend time looking at. I think the alternative to what’s on the table for 2030, things that we’re going to look at together as a group are simpler, more narrow solutions.”
That could mean changes to drivers, changes to golf balls, changes to course setups, and, maybe that the Model Local Rule solution could be back on the table.
You must be registered for see images attach
Yes, it was an idea that was discarded a few years ago and the concept of everyone playing golf using the same equipment and the same rules is a foundation of the sport. It has always been one of golf’s charms, but in the distance debate, that tradition may be the obstacle. Golf is trying to solve an elite-level problem without touching the recreational game. That may not be possible under one equipment standard, at least not cleanly.
An elite-only rule, whether through a competition ball, Model Local Rule or some other narrow mechanism, has been treated for years as a last resort. "Golf" does not like it and many stakeholders have rejected it, but if you are serious about wanting to reduce distance at the highest level while having no effect on recreational golfers, then some form of narrower solution may be the cleanest available answer.
The reset announced Wednesday buys time for the USGA and R&A, which is ironic because many would argue they’ve had plenty. But it also sounds like more people and perspectives now want a say in the discussions. That is good, but Wednesday also made clear that golf does not yet know exactly what the solution will be.
For now, the game has stepped away from the cliff of a potentially ineffective solution, and a larger debate is starting. The frustrating part is that it took this long for everyone to start looking down.
David Dusek is a senior writer at Golfweek covering golf equipment.
This article originally appeared on Golfweek: USGA golf ball rollback reset raises bigger questions
Continue reading...
