Why didn't we try to get Dwayne Rudd?

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,902
Reaction score
6,115
Location
Between the Pipes
Who the hell is our other OLB?

Fisher? And if he doesn't pan out? Doesn't come back 100% from injury?

Rudd would have been an upgrade over Fisher at this point whether LF was healthy or not.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
21,160
Reaction score
23,123
I agree totally, Darling is a good backup, as are many of our other linebackers, but Rudd is a very good player, although people will only remember him for the KC incident. :rolleyes: Fisher is always an injury risk, and we have the money....
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
15,588
Reaction score
8,079
Location
Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by SECTION 11
Who the hell is our other OLB?

Fisher? And if he doesn't pan out? Doesn't come back 100% from injury?

Rudd would have been an upgrade over Fisher at this point whether LF was healthy or not.

Plus he can throw his helmet the farthest on the team :D

I got the feeling it was never really our LB corp Graves was so adamant about upgrading but rather his way of saying, Colvin here we come to try and sign you. I don't know how many LBs the team (or any team for that matter generally carries) but McKinnon, Thompson, Fisher, Darling, Young, Faulk I would imagine will all get roster time.
 
Top