Which of these Players rated 10-20 would you prefer we take at 16?

[SissyBoyFloyd]

Also, see other polls for players who might slip out of top 10, and for players who would be considered a reach for us at 16.

 

[Harry]

Farley then Rousseau

 

[Finito]

Waddle is a game breaker

 

[BritCard]

Waddle easy. It's the most talented there.

I don't really want a round 1 WR but I'm drafting the guy who I think has the best shot of being a star, not just filling a hole.

 

[Chopper0080]

Slater is an all pro C waiting to be selected.

 

[unseenaz]

Etienne could transform our offense, that kid is something special.

 

[Chopper0080]

Etienne could transform our offense, that kid is something special.

Not that special when he is being tackled in the backfield.

 

[unseenaz]

Slater is an all pro C waiting to be selected.

Wouldn’t take a center that high

 

[DVontel]

Wouldn’t take a center that high

But you would take a RB....

 

[Minski]

I have a sneaky feeling that this is the year we trade back into the early 20s and pick up an extra 2nd and then draft a RB, CB and OG/OC in that order with our first 3 picks

 

[unseenaz]

But you would take a RB....

difference maker.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

difference maker.

Not behind our oline

 

[juza76]

Rousseau was a stud last year
He got zero votes
Trade down option?

 

[juza76]

I have a sneaky feeling that this is the year we trade back into the early 20s and pick up an extra 2nd and then draft a RB, CB and OG/OC in that order with our first 3 picks

This year some good players opted out and very likely they will slide a bit
Maybe is a year where trading back is a good option
Certainly the GM has to do a great job

 

[cardncubfan]

Farley