What if SF Would have Taken Pitts at #3

AZ Native

Living is Easy with Eyes Closed
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Posts
15,841
Reaction score
8,033
Location
Cave Creek
I was thinking about this last week. They have Garoppolo for this year regardless. He has a VERY team friendly deal. He could look like Brady with Kittle and Pitts (who could be better than Gronk and Hernandez). Add in their defense and coaching and they could go all the way! I am glad they didn't. Thoughts?
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
36,760
Reaction score
21,135
Do you think any T-end is worth two first-round picks and a third?

Because that's what the 49ers paid to move from 12 to 3.

Pitts is going to play a lot longer and at a higher level than the QB they did pick. They gave away 2 first round picks and wasted a third.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,068
Reaction score
7,164
Location
North of the 49th.
Pitts is going to play a lot longer and at a higher level than the QB they did pick. They gave away 2 first round picks and wasted a third.


Could very well be, but the question is whether you would have paid that price to move up and select a Tend?
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
536,378
Posts
5,257,666
Members
6,275
Latest member
PicksFromDave
Top