xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Thoughts?
We could afford him if we really wanted to. It would mean completely giving up on other parts of the team though.We cant afford DHop and Hill....unless we are going to trade Kyler and go with a cheaper QB for the next few years.
Plus, I think Hill is a complete dirt bag. But he is fast.
This!We could afford him if we really wanted to. It would mean completely giving up on other parts of the team though.
At least he's being more active in bringing players in than Kiem.Does Maxx really have that kind of juice? lol
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Exactly. If Kyler was going into his 2nd year instead of his fourth, you could probably pull the trigger and make it work... like the Rams this year.This!
His base is $3.5 million. You could extend him and make it work long term.
The trade price tag is the issue. Randale and two seconds? Probably more.
The problem is using a 1, (and probably more) and then paying that ginormous salary for years to come.and if the Cardinals are considering using a #1 on a WR, you would hope they would be in the conversation.
Zero chance or just if they trade Hopkins and has no sense at allThe problem is using a 1, (and probably more) and then paying that ginormous salary for years to come.
I don't think they will do it but they could certainly make it work if they wanted to. The salary cap is a myth.
I suggested Scantling weeks ago and was told he was garbage by many. Guess he might be good enough for the Chiefs to replace Hill. Huh.Tom Pelissero
@TomPelissero
·
43m
How would the #Chiefs begin to replace superstar Tyreek Hill? Sources say #Packers free-agent WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling is on his way to Kansas City today for a visit. No deal imminent, but a logical option to help fill the void. Speed for speed.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Wow!! That's a lot of draft capital.