The Market 2022-2023-2024

Devilmaycare

Chief Brah Officer
Moderator
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
6,033
Reaction score
8,476
Location
Scottsdale
This panel supports your sentiment.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Thanks! They're echoing a bunch of what I've been thinking. I'm more bearish on the company though then they are though. That might be because I see too much of how the sausage is made due to my job. I've been in a real love-hate with them the last couple of years thanks to how some of the dev side of thing have been going.
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
Thanks! They're echoing a bunch of what I've been thinking. I'm more bearish on the company though then they are though. That might be because I see too much of how the sausage is made due to my job. I've been in a real love-hate with them the last couple of years thanks to how some of the dev side of thing have been going.

You could so worse than selling near an all time high. It makes me think about trimming back to 5%. I'm currently over 7%.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,074
Location
L.A. area
Thanks! They're echoing a bunch of what I've been thinking. I'm more bearish on the company though then they are though. That might be because I see too much of how the sausage is made due to my job. I've been in a real love-hate with them the last couple of years thanks to how some of the dev side of thing have been going.
Yeah, AAPL is right on the edge of my ESG tolerance. We have quite a bit in mutual funds, but I'm not willing to own it directly.
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
Thanks! They're echoing a bunch of what I've been thinking. I'm more bearish on the company though then they are though. That might be because I see too much of how the sausage is made due to my job. I've been in a real love-hate with them the last couple of years thanks to how some of the dev side of thing have been going.

Good counter points worth considering by Josh Brown.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
Last edited:

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,074
Location
L.A. area
Picked up GSK today at close to a five-year low. They're getting sued over Zantac possibly causing cancer, but it seems as though the punishment to the stock price is exaggerated. And solid dividends don't hurt in this climate, even though of course they aren't enough to cover inflation.
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
Picked up GSK today at close to a five-year low. They're getting sued over Zantac possibly causing cancer, but it seems as though the punishment to the stock price is exaggerated. And solid dividends don't hurt in this climate, even though of course they aren't enough to cover inflation.

I'll have to check them out. I wouldn't mind adding some healthcare exposure. I wonder if they have anything promising in the pipeline.
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
I'm looking to trim my AMZN position if it gets back to $150, equivalent to $3000 pre-split. I sold one share at $3500/$175 before the market sell off. I'm over 11% right now and I'd like to get it down below 10%

I wonder how long it will be before I stop having to translate their price to pre-split values to have the current price make sense to me.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,074
Location
L.A. area
I'll have to check them out. I wouldn't mind adding some healthcare exposure. I wonder if they have anything promising in the pipeline.

I try to stick fairly close to the weighting of the S&P 500, but even with adding GSK I'm still way under in healthcare. I ignored Morningstar's advice to sell high on PFE, so I'm paying for that, and FMS (dialysis equipment) is getting completely hammered, for reasons that aren't entirely clear (as with GSK, there are reasons, but the effect on the stock price seems excessive).

At least I don't hold ARKG anymore!
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,520
Location
SE valley
buddy bought puts the other day and just cashed in over the BBBY crash.

Curious if WSB revolts against ryan cohen and sells GME shares.
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
buddy bought puts the other day and just cashed in over the BBBY crash.

Curious if WSB revolts against ryan cohen and sells GME shares.

Likely a lot of bag holders on that one.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
84,160
Reaction score
32,730
Any reason for todays sell off? I know there's a report Saudis might cut back oil production but that's all I've seen. 2% plus for NASDAQ and close 2 for DOW right now down.

Was hoping to be able to unload some of Lucy's company stock it had rallied back over 80, was at 160 not all that long ago we were thinking if it got back to 100 we could unload some of her ESPP stock that was bought when it was higher but now it's back in the low 70's due to the selloff.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,074
Location
L.A. area
Beats me. Usually analysts blame "profit taking" when the market has been hot for a while and then has a bad day like this.

GSK is one of my very few holdings in the green today, heh.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
35,466
Reaction score
6,894
Location
Scottsdale
Any reason for todays sell off? I know there's a report Saudis might cut back oil production but that's all I've seen. 2% plus for NASDAQ and close 2 for DOW right now down.

Was hoping to be able to unload some of Lucy's company stock it had rallied back over 80, was at 160 not all that long ago we were thinking if it got back to 100 we could unload some of her ESPP stock that was bought when it was higher but now it's back in the low 70's due to the selloff.
Loads of reasons... 10 Year is over 3%. In recent days, many tech/semi companies have issued underwhelming guidance forecasts. And energy has everyone freaked out with some "experts" suggesting we can see Nat Gas hit $20! And lastly, there is growing sentiment that the consumer is going to become steadily pinched by continued inflation (Food, Gas, Housing), and will therefore cutback on spending on non-vital items.

The P/E for the S&P is already slightly above historical levels...and with forecasts coming down and the rest of the stew noted above, it seems quite difficult to see how the market can continue to rise. Tom Lee still seems convinced the S&P will be minimally at 4,400 by year-end, and possible as high as 4,800. The dude is one of the most respected quants on the street..but man, I just don't see how the market could get to those levels.
And I haven't even mentioned the impact from the Fed... with continued rate hikes and their more aggressive Quantitative Tightening program that starts Sept 1st!
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
84,160
Reaction score
32,730
Loads of reasons... 10 Year is over 3%. In recent days, many tech/semi companies have issued underwhelming guidance forecasts. And energy has everyone freaked out with some "experts" suggesting we can see Nat Gas hit $20! And lastly, there is growing sentiment that the consumer is going to become steadily pinched by continued inflation (Food, Gas, Housing), and will therefore cutback on spending on non-vital items.

The P/E for the S&P is already slightly above historical levels...and with forecasts coming down and the rest of the stew noted above, it seems quite difficult to see how the market can continue to rise. Tom Lee still seems convinced the S&P will be minimally at 4,400 by year-end, and possible as high as 4,800. The dude is one of the most respected quants on the street..but man, I just don't see how the market could get to those levels.
And I haven't even mentioned the impact from the Fed... with continued rate hikes and their more aggressive Quantitative Tightening program that starts Sept 1st!

I was thinking it might be related to the housing market but I guess the other stuff makes sense too.

I think much of the tech stuff is overblown, there's a ton of tech execs who are mad at Biden because in the new Inflation Reduction Act there's a part in there that will tax stock buybacks, when you see Republicans saying theres' a 124 billion tax in there on stocks, they're not being honest it's the estimated return from stock buybacks if they tax them. CEO's hate that idea because almost all of them have much of their pay tied to the stock price in both stock options and bonuses based on stock price. Buybacks increase the stock price so they don't want anybody messing with the buyback golden goose.

I think that's a reason they're saying if we can't do buybacks we're going to cut back headcount and bank that money.

interestingly CNBC was saying it may actually INCREASE buybacks this year because it doesn't take effect until next year so companies may use the next few months to buyback before the tax starts.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
35,466
Reaction score
6,894
Location
Scottsdale
I was thinking it might be related to the housing market but I guess the other stuff makes sense too.

I think much of the tech stuff is overblown, there's a ton of tech execs who are mad at Biden because in the new Inflation Reduction Act there's a part in there that will tax stock buybacks, when you see Republicans saying theres' a 124 billion tax in there on stocks, they're not being honest it's the estimated return from stock buybacks if they tax them. CEO's hate that idea because almost all of them have much of their pay tied to the stock price in both stock options and bonuses based on stock price. Buybacks increase the stock price so they don't want anybody messing with the buyback golden goose.

I think that's a reason they're saying if we can't do buybacks we're going to cut back headcount and bank that money.

interestingly CNBC was saying it may actually INCREASE buybacks this year because it doesn't take effect until next year so companies may use the next few months to buyback before the tax starts.
I'm torn on the buyback issue... But hey, if corporations have all that cash lying around - increase dividends!
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
84,160
Reaction score
32,730
I'm torn on the buyback issue... But hey, if corporations have all that cash lying around - increase dividends!

That's the projected unintended consequence some are speculating we might see a 1.5% increase in dividends in 2023 as a result of them not doing the buybacks.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
12,859
Reaction score
7,769
Location
Mesa, AZ
Loads of reasons... 10 Year is over 3%. In recent days, many tech/semi companies have issued underwhelming guidance forecasts. And energy has everyone freaked out with some "experts" suggesting we can see Nat Gas hit $20! And lastly, there is growing sentiment that the consumer is going to become steadily pinched by continued inflation (Food, Gas, Housing), and will therefore cutback on spending on non-vital items.

The P/E for the S&P is already slightly above historical levels...and with forecasts coming down and the rest of the stew noted above, it seems quite difficult to see how the market can continue to rise. Tom Lee still seems convinced the S&P will be minimally at 4,400 by year-end, and possible as high as 4,800. The dude is one of the most respected quants on the street..but man, I just don't see how the market could get to those levels.
And I haven't even mentioned the impact from the Fed... with continued rate hikes and their more aggressive Quantitative Tightening program that starts Sept 1st!
Or the most important indicator of significantly lower stock prices since about the 1950s... A tightening of liquidity/lending/growth. Yield Curve inversion and the following resteepening has a great track record. Much better than any media pundit. Which is why the ole saying "it's different this time" comes to mind right about now across all the media outlets before crashes. No one is paying attention to that resteepening we're about ready to get at some point soon... Then, boom, we'll hear some cockamamie reason after the fact from the talking heads that it had nothing to do with (IMO at least)
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,520
Location
SE valley
There are also notes from powell this week, so, that could be leading to some sell off.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
12,859
Reaction score
7,769
Location
Mesa, AZ
There are also notes from powell this week, so, that could be leading to some sell off.
The Jackson hole meeting will be watched closely for sure. You'll have your wide range of hawk and dove interviews from all the clueless ding dongs at the fed. Lol
 
OP
OP
Folster

Folster

ASFN Icon
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
15,824
Reaction score
6,049
I added a bit to my WBD position after a big down day yesterday. Just watering my weeds.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
533,950
Posts
5,239,791
Members
6,270
Latest member
Golfermcr
Top