Plot twist - Mermaids are like some amphibians, that can switch their gender depending on environmental and other conditionsThen he could portray a mermaid without the cocoanut bra!
Plot twist - Mermaids are like some amphibians, that can switch their gender depending on environmental and other conditionsThen he could portray a mermaid without the cocoanut bra!
As Dr. Ian Malcolm once said, "Life finds a way."Plot twist - Mermaids are like some amphibians, that can switch their gender depending on environmental and other conditions
Speaking of which - as I was typing that I realized that Jurassic Park featured transgendered dinosaurs!As Dr. Ian Malcolm once said, "Life finds a way."
It was that darned frog DNA !!Speaking of which - as I was typing that I realized that Jurassic Park featured transgendered dinosaurs!
lol No.I think you assume the worst of me here.
I will tell you that the movie 9 to 5 grossed over 100mm in 1980 and was the #2 movie at the box office that year beating out Private Benjamin (#6) and Coal miners daughter (#7). Empire Strikes back was #1 that year and if I remember correctly...... all featured very powerful females. Many in the lead role. And don't get me started about what Star trek has done in the area of female empowerment for decades now only to have it crushed by the bumbling idiocy of what Picard became on that streaming service.
I think if you challenged yourself to look deeper into this, you would find that strong female leads can exist in any time period but it takes good writers and good directors making good products.
What we seem to have today is the shoehorning of bad writing, sketchy ideology and solid source material. She-Hulk was an unmitigated disaster, so was the Rings of Power. Both took the source material and warped (rewrote it or reframed it) it to fit the preferred world view of the company making it. I mean..... write the source material? Is that so hard? that stuff works!
How do I know this? Disney told us they were doing it a few years back. And their agenda is not subtle, and so far, not what the paying customers want to see.
All of these have really been cynical cash grabs, retelling incredible stories… only worse and usually with added songs that stink.For the "balanced" reviews that I've read, the pushback on this isn't about any of the social aspects
It's the cynicysm around a formulaic cash grab
That more effort was put in than the streaming releases and more is expected
However, the pure replication of some aspects and hit or miss nature of the new elements isn't going to universally connect - some will get caught up in nostalgia and some will roll their eyes at a corny new song
The feeling is that this is in line with Beauty and the Beast with an expected return in that area - which would be a success when you consider the real goal is to simply make money
I'm in a camp where the live action remake has lost its spark a bit and probably won't see this unless my family really wants to - i didn't watch BATB either and am struggling to recall the last one of these remakes i did go see
lol No.
Pretty straightforward. He was responding to what he bolded in your post.I'm sorry Stout. I didn't understand your post. Could you please elaborate?
Missed that. So he is saying that the Rings of Power and She-Hulk weren't unmitigated disasters?Pretty straightforward. He was responding to what he bolded in your post.