cly2tw said:I don't like Hunter. He is at most adequate at guarding Duncan but can't really gurad Dirk, Brand or Shaq. His shot blocking is valuable but his rebounding is horrendous just as his offense.
carey said:Lindsey Hunter != Steven Hunter
hsandhu said:A lineup of
nash
bell
marion
stat
diaw/kurt (depending on if they are playing a low post big)
with bench:
guards:
barbosa
hunter
frontline:
diaw/kurt
tim thomas
If healthy, that is a hell of a 9 man rotation, that most importantly can play more than one way (like dallas this year). If we have a healthy team, and go in with this lineup for next year, i'll worry about the future later.
Because with that lineup I don't sweat any team, not even san antonio (as we would finally have guys on our roster that would provide REASONABLE matchups with each of their big three, but would have guys on our side they couldn't match up, again as Dallas did this year). If we couldn't win a title with a healthy version of this team, it will have to be because a team was flat out better than us for 4 games.
cheesebeef said:http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3170/career;_ylt=Ao1GTJNe1ycnQPZlnC7U1NKkvLYF
can someone tell me where TT faded into oblivion after he signed his contract. IF anything, he was VERY consistent and actually IMPROVED his stats after he signed the contract. Someone signed him to a HUGE deal, but just because someone made a horrible financial decision doesn't mean that Thomas did nothing afterward. Look at his stats - he actually has been VERY CONSISTENT throughout his career, but because someone put a ridiculous price-tag on him, people perceive that he's a lazy bum. Why is that? He enver put up astronomical numbers before the contract and never did afterward. He is what he is - a GREAT option of the bench and a player who has a knack for playing well deep in the playoffs. In the regular season, the guy has averaged 11.9 points per game, 4 boards on .442 % shooting and .37 from 3, but in the playoffs, he raise shis game to 13.66, 5 boards, 47% shooting and 44% from 3.
The problem with Thomas is that he's perceived to have fallen off the face of the earth after he signed in his contract, when in reality - he just never really deserved ANY OF THAT KIND OF MONEY - but his play never suffered because of it. And who knows what the hell happened in Chicago - that's definitely a mystery.
Jay Cardinal said:Yeah it looks like his stats have remained fairly consistent, and he does seem to be overpaid. But I cant help to have a negative feeling when the Bulls sent home a max-contract player because his piss-poor attitude was affecting the younger players.
The Suns are as close as they have been to a Championship, however they don't need to start handing out Isiah Thomas-like contracts. They need to stay disciplined and plan for the future with this contract.
Jay Cardinal said:Yeah it looks like his stats have remained fairly consistent, and he does seem to be overpaid. But I cant help to have a negative feeling when the Bulls sent home a max-contract player because his piss-poor attitude was affecting the younger players.
The Suns are as close as they have been to a Championship, however they don't need to start handing out Isiah Thomas-like contracts. They need to stay disciplined and plan for the future with this contract.
Joe Mama said:I don't have the numbers in front of me, but my recollection is that Tim Thomas got that ridiculous contract after he had a great playoffs. Then when the next regular season rolled around he played more like a mid-level player. I'm sure the people that gave him that contract (Milwaukee I believe) expected him to improve on his playoff performance since he was young and had the natural talent.
Actually, the knocks on Tim Thomas wouldn't all show up in a stat line. Most people would expect him to be a better rebounder, but more importantly he's had the reputation (deserved) as a piss poor defender.
Tim Thomas is 30 years old, isn't he? I'd feel comfortable giving him a three-year contract. If it took 4 years to get him I could deal with it. There's no way I think we should sign him for five years, and I have my doubts that the Phoenix Suns would be willing to give him a contract that long. If they do, it will be with the plans of using draft picks or promising players to unload him in a couple years.
Joe Mama
sly fly said:And, yes, I would take Matt Harpring and Bobby Jackson over TT.
sly fly said:PHX should just be prepared for what TT delivers on a consistent basis during the regular season. He's been know to coast. And, that can drive coaches crazy.
Mike D has already made a comment in that they already know this about TT, but they'll learn to live with it.
If I'm PHX, no way in hell do I give him more than a 3 year contract.
And, yes, I would take Matt Harpring and Bobby Jackson over TT.
WastedFate said:I agreed with you up until your last point. Harpring and Jackson over TT?
.......
Excuse me while I
Mainstreet said:Sam Cassell would be a good fit behind Nash. I'm not sure of his status but he probably wants more money than the Suns can give. I was impressed he had so much gas left in the tank at age 36 (?).
Evil Ash said:He wants $8 million a year for 2 years to stay with the Clips. If he goes elsewhere it will be for the full MLE
I doubt Cassell would be happy here with the lack of money and playing time