- Feb 4, 2005
- Reaction score
- Tempe, AZ
Semantics—it’s not 2 for 1 because we’d have to waive someone like Ish to accommodate.
I said that....
So a trade that lowers our tax line by $6 million, which should lower the tax bill significantly as I mentioned above, could be done with Indiana involving Ayton for Myles Turner and Jalen Smith. Stix is needed to make the trade work but we'd get 2 for 1 while reducing the tax spending. Then I suppose we could move Stix elsewhere, waive Ish, or something. Just a hypothetical and showing deals are out that can reduce our salary and tax bill as I mentioned above, since I'm sure someone will ask for examples. I'd imagine Turner and Stix could provide 80% of what Ayton does without the baggage.
There's no world where Ish is better than Stix. You're being needlessly pedantic.