Reddick agrees to sign with Carolina

splitsecond

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Posts
5,579
Reaction score
1,526
Location
Chandler, AZ
Keim. He could’ve signed his second first rounder to an easy extension and was a hard pass.

something must’ve been pretty poisonous in that relationship

This point is even more interesting to think about when you consider the fact that Reddick went straight back to his old college coach. Like going back to your ex who was always nice when you leave a toxic relationship.
 

akg102

Veteran
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Posts
171
Reaction score
286
Location
GA
Here's to hoping he has a 15 sack season. Always a great guy and wish him nothing but the best.

Excited to see what our glacial front seven has in store. We may be 5-10% better at stopping the run next year, but it won't make a damn bit of difference for our secondary. I'm predicting a season of league high 3rd-long conversions, a quarter of which will come from Golden/Kennard biting on PA.
 

CFLredzoned

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
1,613
Reaction score
1,119
Location
Melbourne, FL
Don't we need an OLB that can drop into coverage?

It was a disaster when they forced Jones to do it to make room for Suggs. And I don't think Golden's doing it.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,906
Reaction score
13,586
That Keim had no interest in re-signing Reddick is the biggest indictment

the fact guys here wanted to give him 13-15 million a year and he only got 8 on the open market should be end of the conversation about how valued he is around the league

just cause you sign Reddick at 8 here doesn’t mean Kenards salary magically goes away. All you can do is laugh
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
21,031
Reaction score
37,086
Location
UK
Because few people other than you factor in the quality of the NFL OT he is matched up against when getting a sack. It is a sack vs NFL talent. End of story. No one gauges interceptions based upon the QB throwing them or WR the CB was matched up against. It is silly.

Not when it comes to FA it isn't. I guarantee you anyone considering Reddick in FA looked at how his sacks came about and who they were against. Weighting a sack vs Terence Steele as the same thing as a sack vs Trent Williams would be extremely dumb.

It's no different than looking at a boxer with a 23-0 record versus bums and a Boxer with a 23-0 record vs title challengers.

Put it this way. If Reddick's sacks last year were vs any kind of top talent at all he's getting paid $14m+ now but every one was vs a rookie or backup except the coverage sack vs the Niners or vs Detroit where he was covered by Hockenson.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,247
Reaction score
16,392
Location
The Giant Toaster
Not paying him for that price means one side was very bitter. Likely ours since he “put up” after his option was declined which is silly considering they should’ve utilized him better in the first place.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,528
Reaction score
4,936
Location
Gilbert
Not paying him for that price means one side was very bitter. Likely ours since he “put up” after his option was declined which is silly considering they should’ve utilized him better in the first place.
i'm not entirely in the camp of 'reddick was out of position, blame the cards'

he's played on the outside before this past season and never shined. this is for SURE a case of contract year, mixed a LITTLE with his position change.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,895
Reaction score
51,204
Location
SoCal
i'm not entirely in the camp of 'reddick was out of position, blame the cards'

he's played on the outside before this past season and never shined. this is for SURE a case of contract year, mixed a LITTLE with his position change.
So you believe Reddick dogged it before this year. Literally never heard a peep about that in his prior seasons.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
24,247
Reaction score
16,392
Location
The Giant Toaster
i'm not entirely in the camp of 'reddick was out of position, blame the cards'

he's played on the outside before this past season and never shined. this is for SURE a case of contract year, mixed a LITTLE with his position change.

He should’ve shown more talent despite bad coaching that I can’t deny, but... there’s definitely something fishy not bringing him back for that price. The numbers from last year have been posted showing he can do damage if he’s not just getting to the QB.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,096
Reaction score
60,393
Not paying him for that price means one side was very bitter. Likely ours since he “put up” after his option was declined which is silly considering they should’ve utilized him better in the first place.

whole situation was off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmt
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,273
Reaction score
1,134
Location
SE Valley
:stick: I just freakin' hope that Reddick doesn't have a five sack game vs. the Cardinals this upcoming season! :stick:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
534,777
Posts
5,246,203
Members
6,273
Latest member
sarahmoose
Top