OT: 2024 NFL Draft Rumors

Fitz4Ever

Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Posts
465
Reaction score
890
Location
Idaho
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.

I will take that deal all day long. We have more than enough capital to move back up from 12..and if we are adding 2 solid NFL Vets then we need 3rd round picks even less.

Even if we had to trade #12, and all 3 of our 3rd round picks....thats over 2000 points on the chart, which is more than the #4 pick anyway....so I would be extremely confident we could make a deal with a team at 5, 6, 7 or 8 to make sure we still land one of the top WRs.

So we would come out of the draft with Surtain, Sutton, and Odunze/Nabers instead of 3 3rd round rookies...and still have Denver's #1 pick next year. I think Denver is going to suck...even more so getting rid of Surtain and Sutton and starting a rookie QB....so I would take that deal 10/10 times.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Murray
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
35,529
Reaction score
32,373
Location
Orange County, CA
Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.

I will take that deal all day long. We have more than enough capital to move back up from 12..and if we are adding 2 solid NFL Vets then we need 3rd round picks even less.

Even if we had to trade #12, and all 3 of our 3rd round picks....thats over 2000 points on the chart, which is more than the #4 pick anyway....so I would be extremely confident we could make a deal with a team at 5, 6, 7 or 8 to make sure we still land one of the top WRs.

So we would come out of the draft with Surtain, Sutton, and Odunze/Nabers instead of 3 3rd round rookies...and still have Denver's #1 pick next year. I think Denver is going to suck...even more so getting rid of Surtain and Sutton and starting a rookie QB....so I would take that deal 10/10 times.
Sutton's value is probably a day three pick. Much better players have gone for peanuts.
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,583
Reaction score
1,425
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Wow! That would be better than the Vikings offer. Getting an all pro at a premium position would be awesome.
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,583
Reaction score
1,425
FWIW - More from Albright:

Rome Oduzne is viewed as the #3 WR by most teams. Nabers and MHJ are interchangeable as #1.

Giants would select Nabers if they can't get a QB.

To trade back with NYG a first round pick next year is likely to come ARI way. Might also involve a swap of a 2nd or 3rd.

Drake May is the favorite to go #3 to NE.

Chargers looking to trade down. Not guaranteed they select MHJ as they want to establish smash mouth identity.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,168
Reaction score
5,150
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.

I will take that deal all day long. We have more than enough capital to move back up from 12..and if we are adding 2 solid NFL Vets then we need 3rd round picks even less.

Even if we had to trade #12, and all 3 of our 3rd round picks....thats over 2000 points on the chart, which is more than the #4 pick anyway....so I would be extremely confident we could make a deal with a team at 5, 6, 7 or 8 to make sure we still land one of the top WRs.

So we would come out of the draft with Surtain, Sutton, and Odunze/Nabers instead of 3 3rd round rookies...and still have Denver's #1 pick next year. I think Denver is going to suck...even more so getting rid of Surtain and Sutton and starting a rookie QB....so I would take that deal 10/10 times.
Being honest, I was sure that the Texans pick would be Top Five, this year. I amaze myself with how little I know.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
539,290
Posts
5,285,679
Members
6,280
Latest member
alaskabustergreen
Top