Let’s Talk About Lamb

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
What also irritates me is that I think Jeudy is a clearly better prospect than Lamb, so not only I would be pissed about going WR at #8, it would be the lesser WR.

lmao at this guy

worst poster itt by far and with stiff competition from Brit and Solar
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,668
Reaction score
10,871
REALLY wish we had Lamb or Ruggs now instead of Simmons (not writing him off, but the WRs look damn good).

We need a #2 WR badddddddddd.

Who's to say that if we drafted Lamb or Ruggs that they wouldn't be sitting the bench like Isabella or Simmons has for running the wrong route or missing a tackle for example?
 

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
Find me a single post in this entire thread that says anything of the sort. Because I just went through this thread, and I sure couldn't. The argument the whole time was that Lamb is a great player but we couldn't afford to invest in the luxury of taking him. I still stand by that.





Nothing here says anything about Kirk being better. The most I could find was calling him a "serviceable #2." I'm just sick and tired of redrafting positions. We had 4 picks over 2 years at the position, and traded away a 2nd rounder and paid a guy a ton of money to be our #1. 16 other teams passed on Lamb, too. He was the 3rd WR off the board. He was never realistically an option where we picked.

Were you tired of drafting QBs in the top10 after Rosen? Sunk cost theory: read up.

Please don’t pretend like you and others didn’t clearly imply that we were “set” at WR with our stacked WR Room. You and others have said as much in many threads. You’re all extremely wrong. Admit it and move on. Even with Hopkins playing at top top expectation, our WR play has been mediocre.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
10,973
Reaction score
11,582
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Were you tired of drafting QBs in the top10 after Rosen? Sunk cost theory: read up.

Please don’t pretend like you and others didn’t clearly imply that we were “set” at WR with our stacked WR Room. You and others have said as much in many threads. You’re all extremely wrong. Admit it and move on. Even with Hopkins playing at top top expectation, our WR play has been mediocre.
I'm sick of the sunk cost theory argument from this board. How about reading up on GMs that draft successful players to fill holes? Yes, I was tired of drafting QBs in the top 10 after Rosen.

We don't need a #2 baaaaaaaad. We need a new GM that stops missing on all but one pick a year. Lamb looks good, sure, but he also has an MVP candidate throwing to him. Let's see what happens with Dalton the rest of the year. Also, maybe we'd be more "set" at WR if Kyler stopped sailing balls over wide open receivers' heads.

lmao at this guy

worst poster itt by far and with stiff competition from Brit and Solar
You're just trolling or being an ass at this point.
 

TaylorSwift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
1,406
Reaction score
1,240
Location
Phoenix
Kiem needs to have no more input in drafting decisions.

He is lucky he has some business sense when it comes to signings because the man is a horrible football evaluator
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
7,715
Reaction score
11,244
Location
St Louis, MO
Kirk at 38.5 yards per game is our #2.
Lamb is 85+
Kirk doesnt have Lamb's physicality.

I actually like him and Andy. However, they both dont have a large catch radius.

Its part of the reason why Kyler's not willing to throw guys open as much.


That 1st drive where Kyler just heaved the ball up...Lamb or Gallup plucks that out of the air.

Again..still like Kirk and Andy though.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,668
Reaction score
10,871
Kirk doesnt have Lamb's physicality.

I actually like him and Andy. However, they both dont have a large catch radius.

Its part of the reason why Kyler's not willing to throw guys open as much.


That 1st drive where Kyler just heaved the ball up...Lamb or Gallup plucks that out of the air.

Again..still like Kirk and Andy though.

Or Hopkins, or probably even Fitz. We don't necessarily need another receiver that high points the ball. We need a slot specialist.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
7,715
Reaction score
11,244
Location
St Louis, MO
Or Hopkins, or probably even Fitz. We don't necessarily need another receiver that high points the ball. We need a slot specialist.
Ehh...

I dont know if its play calling or Kyler, but we dont throw downfield to Fitz anymore...like at all.

Seemed like we threw deep to Fitz a lot to beginning the year last year.

Difference with Gallup is he's a legit deep threat. Like a better Will Fuller that opens up things for Hopkins.

Lamb is crushing it in the slot. Even though he can play the outside as well.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,668
Reaction score
10,871
Ehh...

I dont know if its play calling or Kyler, but we dont throw downfield to Fitz anymore...like at all.

Seemed like we threw deep to Fitz a lot to beginning the year last year.

Difference with Gallup is he's a legit deep threat. Like a better Will Fuller that opens up things for Hopkins.

Lamb is crushing it in the slot. Even though he can play the outside as well.

Fitz doesn't have the speed to get downfield anymore. By the time he would get there, the pocket would collapse in most cases.

It is as simple as that.
 

Dougmo

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Posts
156
Reaction score
62
Geez, what's up with all the vitriol and personal attacks on this board?
At this point Lamb certainly looks legit, and it's fun to think about him combined with DHop but who knows if he'd be performing at that level in this offense?
As i remember it, most of us really liked him in the draft but when Simmons dropped to us, IMO it was a no brainer to take him. He was at a huge position of need and by all accounts a top 5 talent, which Lamb was not by popular consensus.
We can, and should, second guess our coordinators ability to use his unique talents, which may never translate in the nfl, but I think 2nd guessing the pick is revisionist history.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Murray
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
34,280
Reaction score
30,229
Location
Orange County, CA
Or Hopkins, or probably even Fitz. We don't necessarily need another receiver that high points the ball. We need a slot specialist.

I think Isabella can be that guy, but he needs to start consistently making the catch. Against the Panthers he slows up and barely missed a deep shot from Murray that would've been a big play. Against the Jets, he dropped what would have been at least a 17 yard gain with a bit of room to run.

If I'm Kliff I design some plays to get Andy open in space during no pressure situations.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,906
Reaction score
13,586
Ehh...

I dont know if its play calling or Kyler, but we dont throw downfield to Fitz anymore...like at all.

Seemed like we threw deep to Fitz a lot to beginning the year last year.

Difference with Gallup is he's a legit deep threat. Like a better Will Fuller that opens up things for Hopkins.

Lamb is crushing it in the slot. Even though he can play the outside as well.

Fitz hasn’t been a downfield threat in years dude.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
20,906
Reaction score
13,586
Last year to begin the season we were throwing to Fitz deep.

Not really. Maybe a couple throws here and there but if you seen him in his prime you wouldn’t be saying he was a downfield threat last year. It’s night and day

BA moved Fitz to the inside years ago. He’s not that guy and hasn’t been in years.
 
Top