Kyler Murray Debacle Thread

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
43,141
Reaction score
30,616
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
No that is true. His performance hasn't met the expectations of that draft selection. Even still, you can win with that performance on a much cheaper contract.

Just like you can win with Brissett being so cheap if you didn't have Murray's 20% cap hit anchoring the team
Except you can't win with Murray at any number. He has proven to be win-averse. He is the opposite of clutch. He shrinks in the big moments.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
43,141
Reaction score
30,616
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
To specifically answer this question...

Kyler can lead us to mediocrity and that is all. Without him, we are straight booty cheeks.

So he elevates a booty cheeks team to mediocrity, not anything beyond. We are done with this because no one wants mediocrity or ass.

Also, as long as the current management exists, we are far more likely to be close to 11% than exceed 43%
He elevated nothing. He had the healthy team and barely eeked out a few wins versus sucky teams. He would be doing worse than JB if he played with the current roster. Key-rist, are you becoming a stan too?
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
15,273
Reaction score
28,958
Also how could you be mad about no Ceedee when the team went out and got you Dhop that year? Who was largely considered a top 3WR in the league still. Then went out and performed like it that season?
Probably because it would have prevented Keim from drafting a bust? You serious with this question?
 
OP
OP
Weenus O'Baggins

Weenus O'Baggins

Arizona Sports Simp
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
45,061
Reaction score
40,264
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Take all the stats , roll them up in a ball and go bowling.
If people can’t see this offense is being run better then I don’t know what to say.
Maybe we should ask McBride and Wilson what they think.

There are aspects of the offense that have improved. Overall, it's not meaningful
 
OP
OP
Weenus O'Baggins

Weenus O'Baggins

Arizona Sports Simp
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
45,061
Reaction score
40,264
Location
Scottsdale, Az
He elevated nothing. He had the healthy team and barely eeked out a few wins versus sucky teams. He would be doing worse than JB if he played with the current roster. Key-rist, are you becoming a stan too?

He had a not healthy team in the final 8 games of 2023 and produced better results than the 9 games before him.

Again, three years is not a small sample size.

I don't see how the term "stan" would apply when I say its not good enough and it is time to move on
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,518
Reaction score
2,941
Location
Charleston, SC
Blowouts are even more exciting!
I need to know. You're not equating blowout losses with QB play are you? Its been your regular go to in this debate. garbage time stats! (definitely some validity to that) Blowout losses!( I really don't think its nearly as equitable to QB play as you purport to).

The blowout losses have come as the injuries to the D have mounted, and definitely once we were removed from the playoff picture a couple weeks back and we started playing the kids.

Certainly, 3 and outs lead to blowout losses against high powered offenses. But the crap OL play, the diminutive RB room all those things lead to 3 and outs, not just QB play. I just don't understand how you can watch these games, watch Brissett, and remember KM, and NOT think that while overall certainly a talent deficient QB in terms of getting us to the promised land, Brissett has a greater command of the offense. One can speculate as why, but my eyes tell me its his size, and his heart; a willingness to take a hit. Murray lacks both IMO.

Your rebuttals in this incessant argument seem to be all about zinger one liners. Not actual well considered analysis of how this is not a single player sport, and that one bad play by a single player has a ripple effect.

I don't want to watch Brissett much longer. He is slow of foot, and his release speed is infuriating. He waits a fraction of a second too long to start that long ass windup, and often that causes problems. But you're going to the matt for a QB that....well, if you cant see how ineffective he has been since well, 2021 (!!! that's 4 years!!!) then I don't know what to tell you. Yes, he's also been surrounded by the same organizational crap for those years, and that has to be accounted for. But KM simply doesn't pass the eye test, especially if you look past the flash plays.

Its time to move on. And I hope we can lock this thread down and never speak of it again.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
43,141
Reaction score
30,616
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
He had a not healthy team in the final 8 games of 2023 and produced better results than the 9 games before him.

Again, three years is not a small sample size.

I don't see how the term "stan" would apply when I say its not good enough and it is time to move on
Because you're hard-core defending Kyler and claiming falsely that he elevated...anything. Unless by elevated you mean he's better than nobodies and career backups, then hooray! He "elevated" the team. Kyler is better than chopped suey as a QB. Duh! Winning more than backups and journeymen isn't elevating a team; it's bare minimum standard for a starting QB.

Kyler is what he is: a bottom half of the league starting QB and choke artist who can make flashy plays that sometimes win games, but is wildly inconsistent.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
78,281
Reaction score
33,061
Location
Killjoy Central
The defense is a bigger issue than the QB. It took Houston around 40 seconds & 2 plays to score their first TD on Sunday. We aren't stopping anyone.
It definitely does not help when you have literally no running game either. Bam Knight just went onto IR and he was our leading rusher for the season with 249 yards. 249 yards in 14 games is your top RB?! You definitely are not beating many teams with that kind of unbalanced offense - when the other team does not need to worry about you running it at all and can load up against the pass all game long.
 
OP
OP
Weenus O'Baggins

Weenus O'Baggins

Arizona Sports Simp
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
45,061
Reaction score
40,264
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Because you're hard-core defending Kyler and claiming falsely that he elevated...anything. Unless by elevated you mean he's better than nobodies and career backups, then hooray! He "elevated" the team. Kyler is better than chopped suey as a QB. Duh! Winning more than backups and journeymen isn't elevating a team; it's bare minimum standard for a starting QB.

Kyler is what he is: a bottom half of the league starting QB and choke artist who can make flashy plays that sometimes win games, but is wildly inconsistent.

I agree that he is a bottom half of the league QB. I have him in like the 18-20 range, which is why we should move on.

I am just looking at the numbers and removing emotion out of it. Those numbers tell me this story:

He can elevate a dog crap team to mediocrity but he can't elevate a dog crap team to higher than mediocrity.

He is massively overpaid for his production and he hasn't lived up to his draft status.

Shane is correct that being overpaid and not living up to your draft status are problems. I would put that somewhere below Owner, GM, and HC based on the 2-16 record without him.
 
OP
OP
Weenus O'Baggins

Weenus O'Baggins

Arizona Sports Simp
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
45,061
Reaction score
40,264
Location
Scottsdale, Az

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
42,645
Reaction score
39,339
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Shane is correct that being overpaid and not living up to your draft status are problems.
I don’t think where Kyler was drafted seven years ago matters at all. His cap hold hasn’t prevented any potential moves.

Kyler’s mediocre play is the main problem with Kyler Murray.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
42,645
Reaction score
39,339
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Kyler’s 9 to 5 mindset is the main problem with Kyler.

We don’t know this. But he hasn’t done much in to dispel the impression and make it hard to cheer for him.

That is covered under his QB 18-20 ranking

Yes, but it seems like draft status and salary are reasons to pile on him than any actual “problem” caused for the franchise.
 

602 Native

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
4,936
Reaction score
9,092
Location
Gilbert
K1 is the problem with the Cards guys. Just ask the KDS Crew.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

602 Native

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
4,936
Reaction score
9,092
Location
Gilbert
We don’t know this. But he hasn’t done much in to dispel the impression and make it hard to cheer for him.



Yes, but it seems like draft status and salary are reasons to pile on him than any actual “problem” caused for the franchise.
Careful you might be labeled a K1 Stan for spitting these facts.
 

602 Native

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
4,936
Reaction score
9,092
Location
Gilbert
I need to know. You're not equating blowout losses with QB play are you? Its been your regular go to in this debate. garbage time stats! (definitely some validity to that) Blowout losses!( I really don't think its nearly as equitable to QB play as you purport to).

The blowout losses have come as the injuries to the D have mounted, and definitely once we were removed from the playoff picture a couple weeks back and we started playing the kids.

Certainly, 3 and outs lead to blowout losses against high powered offenses. But the crap OL play, the diminutive RB room all those things lead to 3 and outs, not just QB play. I just don't understand how you can watch these games, watch Brissett, and remember KM, and NOT think that while overall certainly a talent deficient QB in terms of getting us to the promised land, Brissett has a greater command of the offense. One can speculate as why, but my eyes tell me its his size, and his heart; a willingness to take a hit. Murray lacks both IMO.

Your rebuttals in this incessant argument seem to be all about zinger one liners. Not actual well considered analysis of how this is not a single player sport, and that one bad play by a single player has a ripple effect.

I don't want to watch Brissett much longer. He is slow of foot, and his release speed is infuriating. He waits a fraction of a second too long to start that long ass windup, and often that causes problems. But you're going to the matt for a QB that....well, if you cant see how ineffective he has been since well, 2021 (!!! that's 4 years!!!) then I don't know what to tell you. Yes, he's also been surrounded by the same organizational crap for those years, and that has to be accounted for. But KM simply doesn't pass the eye test, especially if you look past the flash plays.

Its time to move on. And I hope we can lock this thread down and never speak of it again.
Another fan that was a K1 hater that now wants to run away from backing JB.

Wait till next season when the franchise trots out some other derelict at QB.

How many more of you are there?
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
74,668
Reaction score
51,690
Location
Las Vegas
The way the Kyler jockers talk about Kyler and how he is this awesome QB and the whole league knows it. Especially two specific posters. Then the trade market for Kyler should be alive and well. Let’s see what the Cards get for him. Especially considering how much salary they’re gonna have to eat makes Kyler super affordable. If he’s the player, they say he is. A $35 million salary for a player of his supposed caliber is nothing in today’s QB market. Let’s see how this plays out.

I mean with how they talk there should be a bidding war for his services because he’s just so damn special and good and most GMs know this(their words not me). On top of affordable.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,078,234
Posts
6,214,291
Members
6,412
Latest member
dingo
Back
Top