Insider 8/30/2005 Shakeup in the West

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
Updated: Aug. 30, 2005, 10:35 AM ET

Major shakeup in West ... after the Spurs, that is

By Chad Ford
ESPN Insider

For the past five years, the Western Conference teams have dominated the East.

This looks like the year the pendulum starts swinging the other way. Only two teams in the West, the Kings and Rockets, significantly upgraded while several playoff teams -- the Mavs, Grizzlies and Suns -- were significantly weakened this summer.

That leaves room for cellar dwellers such as the Warriors to finally break through, while the dream may be over for former Cinderellas such as the Grizzlies.

Insider breaks down how this summer's moves will likely reshuffle the standings in the West next season.

Ford's Projected 2005-06 Western Conference Standings
Seed Team Breakdown

Spurs

Major additions: Nick Van Exel, Fabricio Oberto
Major subtractions: None

The skinny: The world champs won in convincing fashion last year, and they come back to defend their title with every key player still on their roster. The addition of Oberto, one of the top big men in Europe in the last five years, only strengthens them. As long as Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili stay healthy, they're the team to beat. If they also somehow get their claws on Michael Finley, everyone is in for a world of trouble.


Kings

Major additions: Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Bonzi Wells, Jason Hart
Major subtractions: Cuttino Mobley, Bobby Jackson, Greg Ostertag

The skinny: It looks like the window never closes completely in Sacramento. Just when it looked like time to write off the Kings for good, GM Geoff Petrie had a stellar summer and the Kings suddenly look very formidable again. Their starting five (Mike Bibby, Peja Stojakovic, Brad Miller, Abdur-Rahim and Wells) is terrific. And for the first time in several years, they have a very solid bench, with Kenny Thomas, Corliss Williamson and Brian Skinner anchoring up front and Hart in the backcourt. If either second-year guard Kevin Martin or rookie Francisco Garcia step up, the Kings will have the ammunition to give the Spurs a run.

Suns

Major additions: Kurt Thomas, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw, Brian Grant
Major subtractions: Joe Johnson, Quentin Richardson, Nate Robinson, Steven Hunter

The skinny: The Suns literally ran away with the West last season, but major changes threaten to end some of the fun. Losing Johnson was an especially tough blow. Not only was he the team's best 3-point shooter, but he was also the primary backup at the point for Steve Nash. Thomas, Bell, Diaw and Grant all add defensive toughness, something the Suns sorely lacked last season. But to get it, you've got to wonder if the Suns traded away the critical elements that made them special last year. I doubt they'll be nearly as good (or entertaining) during the regular season. But if the toughness pays off in the playoffs, GM Bryan Colangelo doesn't care.


Houston

Major additions: Stromile Swift, Derek Anderson, Luther Head
Major subtractions: Clarence Weatherspoon

The skinny: Jeff Van Gundy has been complaining about his backcourt ever since he got to Houston and now he has eight players to hold up the ship. Anderson and Head are the two most important new additions at guard, but the impact might pale in comparison to the big athletic guy they got to play alongside Yao Ming. Swift has been an enigma his entire career -- superstar talent, subpar work ethic. If Van Gundy can get consistent effort out of him (remember, two pretty good coaches, Hubie Brown and Mike Fratello, couldn't), the Rockets could be poised to take a major step forward in the West. But even at half-speed, Swift remains a significant shot blocking and rebounding force in the middle.


Nuggets

Major additions: Julius Hodge, Linas Kleiza
Major subtractions: None

The skinny: New head coach George Karl worked miracles with the Nuggets toward the end of last season. But Denver is still a stellar shooting guard away from being a legit contender. Hodge was a good draft pick, but his ugly shot won't help the Nuggets in the 3-point department. GM Kiki Vandeweghe has been working the phones all summer, but has come up empty in his pursuit of a veteran two guard. The Nuggets are now flirting with Latrell Sprewell. That should tell you how desperate they've become.


Warriors

Major additions: Ike Diogu, Chris Taft
Major subtractions: None

The skinny: No one has been tougher than I have been on the Warriors for the past six years. New GM Chris Mullin got off to a shaky start last summer when he signed Derek Fisher and Adonal Foyle to ridiculous deals. But since then, his moves have been stellar. Adding Baron Davis at the trade deadline had an amazing effect on the team. Then Mullin followed it up with one of the best drafts of the summer. Diogu could give the Warriors a much-needed Elton Brand-esque presence in the paint. With the improvement of Jason Richardson, Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy last season, the Warriors could be on the verge of a big jump in the West. If everyone stays healthy (always a big if for Davis), the Warriors' long playoff drought will end.


Mavs

Major additions: Doug Christie
Major subtractions: Michael Finley

The skinny: The Big Three is now just the Big One. Luckily for the Mavs, the remaining player of the trio happens to be the best -- Dirk Nowitzki, but he'll have an even bigger load to carry. Once upon a time, the Mavs were a fun run-and-gun team. Now, with Avery Johnson at the helm, it looks like they're getting serious about defense. Christie, Jason Terry, Erick Dampier and Josh Howard can all be tough defenders. If Marquis Daniels can jump back from an off year, if Devin Harris can prove he's ready to handle the point and if the Mavs can get something out of one of their three project centers (D.J. Mbenga, Pavel Podkolzin and DeSagana Diop) the Mavs will still be formidable. But that's an awful lot of ifs for a team that once had aspirations for a championship.



Sonics

Major additions: None
Major subtractions: Antonio Daniels, Jerome James

The skinny: The Sonics were the surprise team in the West last year. We picked them to finish last and instead, they finished third. Can the magic continue? There are a lot of factors working against a Sonics Cinderella repeat. Head coach Nate McMillan is gone. Daniels, a key reserve and the team's best perimeter defender, bolted for Washington. One other key free agent, Vladimir Radmanovic, remains unsigned. The Sonics' success had a lot to do with great chemistry and coaching. With McMillan gone and the team visibly weaker, you've got to wonder how far Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis and Luke Ridnour can actually take them. In other words, an eighth seed might be too generous, especially if they lose Radmanovic.


Timberwolves

Major additions: Marko Jaric, Rashad McCants
Major subtractions: Sam Cassell, Latrell Sprewell, Fred Hoiberg

The skinny: Last season was a disaster in just about every way imaginable. GM Kevin McHale had to fire his best friend, Flip Saunders, and take the team over himself with mediocre results. McHale has worked hard to purge his team of his two prize acquisitions two years ago -- Cassell and Sprewell. In their place is Jaric, a versatile, big guard who plays with great toughness and intensity and McCants, one of the most talented (and troubled) players in this year's draft. Will they be enough to get the Wolves back to the playoffs? We'll see. The team still lacks a decent center and a veteran two guard should McCants not be ready to step up.



Clips

Major additions: Sam Cassell, Cuttino Mobley
Major subtractions: Bobby Simmons, Marko Jaric

At the end of the 2004-05 regular season, I was convinced the Clippers were on the verge of the playoffs this upcoming season. Now, not so much. Had the team kept Simmons and Jaric (and drafted Danny Granger instead of Yaroslav Korolev), I think they would've been a serious playoff team. With Mobley and Cassell on the team, I wonder if Elton Brand and Corey Maggette will ever see the ball again. The Cassell trade is the biggest head scratcher. Cassell poisoned his team last year. With Shaun Livingston looking like the brightest star to come out of the Clippers in a long time, why risk poisoning him with Cassell? Once again, the Clippers looked to be on the verge of something special and found a way to screw it up.

Fakers! :)

Major additions: Kwame Brown, Aaron McKie
Major subtractions: Caron Butler, Chucky Atkins, Brian Grant

The skinny: The Lakers are, without a doubt, the hardest team in the league to place right now. Can Phil Jackson fix everything that went wrong in L.A.? Will Kobe Bryant respond to his coaching and start sharing the ball? Will Brown, playing on a two-year deal, finally live up to his potential? Who's going to play point guard? Will high school rookie Andrew Bynum be ready to contribute in the middle? If all of these issues work themselves out, the Lakers will be back in the hunt for the playoffs. If they don't, the Lakers' soap opera might rival what will go on in New York this season.



Utah

Major additions: Deron Williams, Greg Ostertag
Major subtractions: Kirk Snyder, Curtis Borchardt, Raul Lopez

The skinny: Last year we thought the Jazz could be as high as a sixth seed in the West. A major injury to Andrei Kirilenko destroyed any chance of the Jazz's competing for the playoffs. Now that he's healthy, why aren't the Jazz back atop the list? Especially with the addition of Williams to run the point? They might be. If Kirilenko and Matt Harpring can stay healthy and Mehmet Okur shows up to camp in shape, the Jazz could be sleepers again. Then again, given the stiff competition in the West, it's a tough bet.


Grizzlies

Major additions: Eddie Jones, Bobby Jackson, Damon Stoudamire, Hakim Warrick
Major subtractions: Stromile Swift, Jason Williams, James Posey, Bonzi Wells, Earl Watson

The skinny: Last year the Grizzlies were the deepest team in the league. But after losing five critical players (two starters and three key reserves) it's hard to believe that the Grizzlies can keep up the success. Jones is on the downside of his career. Stoudamire and Jackson are both shooting guards masquerading as point guards. Warrick has talent, but he's not ready yet. The bottom line is that the Grizzlies have less talent than they did last year. While it might help a bit in the chemistry department, look for the win column to take a big hit.



Blazers

Major additions: Martell Webster, Juan Dixon, Sergei Monia
Major subtractions: Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Damon Stoudamire, Derek Anderson, Nick Van Exel

The skinny: The Blazers have one of the brightest young squads in the league and one of the league's best coaches in Nate McMillan, but they will be in over their heads in the West this year. Losing four veterans and replacing them with three rookies and a lifelong reserve probably won't translate into wins this season. The good news is that the Blazers look loaded for the future. Zach Randolph has already arrived -- and will improve when he starts to share the ball. Travis Outlaw looked awesome this summer. Sebastian Telfair is improving. If the Blazers get the long-range shooting from Webster and Monia and the toughness in the paint from Joel Przybilla, they'll be tough ... eventually. But their fans are going to have to be patient.


Hornets

Major additions: Chris Paul, Arvydas Macijauskas, Kirk Snyder
Major subtractions: Dan Dickau

The skinny: The Hornets have had a decent summer, but it won't be enough to lift them out of the cellar in the West. Paul has a chance to be the top point guard in the league someday. Pair him with J.R. Smith and Jamaal Magloire (assuming he doesn't demand a trade) and the Hornets have a nice core. Macijauskas, Snyder, Chris Andersen and Speedy Claxton all are solid reserves. Another year in the lottery and a decent free agent signing next summer and the Hornets should be movin' on up. But this year, expect more misery.

,
 

PakistaniRambo

Registered
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Posts
107
Reaction score
0
oops, guess you got to it quicker than i did :)

i don't agree with #2 at all! what a weird choice. I think they'll be lucky to have homecourt in the 1st round. i'm also surprised that dallas took such a drop off..and how the warriors are ranked higher than them. that definitely wont happen. I think the warriors will make the playoffs, but will be a 7 seed at the highest.

also, i don't think the sonics will even make the playoffs, they got lucky last year in my opinion. look for maybe the timberwolves or clips to sneak into the playoffs.
 

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
All right. Here's mine. These are playoff seedings, not playoff results.

1. San Antonio Spurs
2. Phoenix Suns
3. Denver Nuggets(because of division)
4. Dallas Mavericks
5. Houston Rockets
6. Sacramento Kings
7. Minnesota Timberwolves
8. Golden State Warriors
9. Memphis Grizzlies
10. Seattle Supersonics
11. Utah Jazz
12. Los Angeles Lakers
13. Los Angeles Clippers
14. Portland Trailblazers
15. New Orleans Hornets
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
I think it's still too early to say. Finley will make a difference somewhere, and I can't believe that Minnesota doesn't plan to add more big-man help somehow. There's still too much shuffling around to be done.
 

PakistaniRambo

Registered
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Posts
107
Reaction score
0
fordronken said:
All right. Here's mine. These are playoff seedings, not playoff results.

1. San Antonio Spurs
2. Phoenix Suns
3. Denver Nuggets(because of division)
4. Dallas Mavericks
5. Houston Rockets
6. Sacramento Kings
7. Minnesota Timberwolves
8. Golden State Warriors
9. Memphis Grizzlies
10. Seattle Supersonics
11. Utah Jazz
12. Los Angeles Lakers
13. Los Angeles Clippers
14. Portland Trailblazers
15. New Orleans Hornets

The Denver pick has got to be like a given u know? only other team capable of taking #3 would be the T'wolves, but i really don't see that happening. I think Houston and Dallas can be argued either way as a 4 or 5 seed, but they will definitely be there because the Spurs will be #1 in their division. Everything else seems pretty realistic, aside from perhaps the t'wolves. they are too unpredictable...

look for the jazz or clips to slip into that 8th spot.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
I'm really surprised that Ford has bought into this belief that the Suns will suddenly stop being a running team or stop shooting threes.

The Suns will run. If anything, the addition of a first rate defensive rebounder will free Marion and Stoudemire to release quicker. KT may not shoot the three, but as a trailer on the break he will get a lot of open jump shots on kick outs.

Same scheme - different faces.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
I wouldn't expect Thomas to be much of a scoring factor on fast breaks. He's not a particularly adept finisher in the paint, and teams don't usually "kick out" to the free-throw line, which is where he's most comfortable.

The Suns will run less this season, but that doesn't mean they'll be a worse team.
 

Neo

Red Tape Sorter
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Posts
517
Reaction score
0
Location
Deep in Enemy Territory
I doubt having Thomas in the line up will slow things down much, if at all. If anything I think he may help. KT will be there on the defensive end to help get stops and rebounds so that we can run.

Four other players running down the court, filling lanes is more than adequate for an effective fast break. How often with the Showtime Lakers did Kareem not make it past half court before Worthy, Magic, et al. scored on a fast break?

With Amare, Marion, Nash and any decent wing playing the other spot on the floor, there is always the threat of fastbreak baskets.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
I'm just saying that last year's team was one of the most explosive offenses in league history, and the personnel to repeat that performance probably aren't in place. They'll still score enough points and get their share of easy baskets; I'm not worried about that.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
GRRRR....even the well respected Chad Ford is piling on.......THE KINGS???? THE KINGS???? When does perrinial headcase Bonzi + perrinial loser SAR = second best team in the West.....?????
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
The Kings is definitely a flyer choice when ranking the west. To be Honest I am surprised that they haven't gotten more pub since most people don't like the Suns moves.

Keep in mind, in order to get the 2nd seed in the west you have to have a better record than the Suns. That is all. The best team in the northwest division are the Nuggets, I don't think it is a stretch that Sac. will have a better record than them.
 

SactownSunsFan

Welcome to the Age of Ayton
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Posts
1,938
Reaction score
123
Location
Sacramento, CA
Did anybody else notice in the East article one of the Pacers' major subtractions is James Jones, yet somehow he's not a major addition on the Suns in the West article? What's up with that?

I don't think our offense will slow down much, but our defense will be much better. I don't understand why these writers are being so pessimistic about our off-season. It seems like the domino effect. One writer starts out writing his POV about our moves, and the other writers follow what was previously written to avoid sticking out like a sore thumb. It's like they do this for job security reasons.
 
OP
OP
S

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
elindholm said:
I'm just saying that last year's team was one of the most explosive offenses in league history, and the personnel to repeat that performance probably aren't in place. They'll still score enough points and get their share of easy baskets; I'm not worried about that.

I agree with you, :hairraise the suns will not be as explosive this year, especially at the start of the year.


-
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
It is not self evident the Suns won't go small at least 50% of the time. Shawn moves to PF, Bell to SG, or either JJax or Jones to SF. On the Suns running offense, the slightly lower three point shooting by Bell would be offset by the improved percentage from the SF position.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
I don't think it will be 50% of the time, because they didn't acquire Thomas to play less than half of each game. But I agree that small ball is likely to continue as one of the Suns' main weapons.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
elindholm said:
I don't think it will be 50% of the time, because they didn't acquire Thomas to play less than half of each game. But I agree that small ball is likely to continue as one of the Suns' main weapons.

Actually the key will be Grant's minutes rather than KT's. If Amare plays 36 minutes a game and KT 32 (what he did in 02-03 and 03-04), that leaves 28 minutes. If Grant is mostly healthy, then he gets 18-20. If he is not capable of those minutes, then the small ball proportion expands. Half would be if Grant couldn't play hardly at all.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
Half would be if Grant couldn't play hardly at all.

How do you figure? Any small-ball lineup will be with Stoudemire and a wing (generally Marion) as the two bigs. That means Thomas isn't on the floor, so if you have him penciled in for 32 minutes per game, that leaves a maximum of 16 for small ball.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
elindholm said:
Half would be if Grant couldn't play hardly at all.

How do you figure? Any small-ball lineup will be with Stoudemire and a wing (generally Marion) as the two bigs. That means Thomas isn't on the floor, so if you have him penciled in for 32 minutes per game, that leaves a maximum of 16 for small ball.

Just like when Hunter was in and Amare was out - Thomas at center and Marion at PF.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
26,831
Reaction score
8,076
Location
L.A. area
Just like when Hunter was in and Amare was out - Thomas at center and Marion at PF.

I guess I agree that that could happen occasionally, but I'll be extremely surprised if we see it for anything close to 8 minutes per game on a regular basis.
 

coloradosun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Posts
1,393
Reaction score
0
I am very disappointed that I have to correct Chad Ford.

We picked Nate Robinson for the Knicks, he was never on the Suns.
 

tobiazz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
2,153
Reaction score
4
coloradosun said:
I am very disappointed that I have to correct Chad Ford.

We picked Nate Robinson for the Knicks, he was never on the Suns.

I think it's important to list him, because we did lose the rights to him to complete the trade. It may make more sense to display #1 draft pick instead, since the Suns would not have necessarily drafted him, but it's really not a big deal.
 

tobiazz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
2,153
Reaction score
4
Mavs

Major additions: Doug Christie
Major subtractions: Michael Finley

The skinny: The Big Three is now just the Big One. Luckily for the Mavs, the remaining player of the trio happens to be the best -- Dirk Nowitzki, but he'll have an even bigger load to carry. Once upon a time, the Mavs were a fun run-and-gun team.

Yeah, Dirk is definitely the best of the three. If any of them were to theoretically win an MVP trophy, it would definitely be him--oh, wait....
 

Chaz

observationist
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
11,327
Reaction score
7
Location
Wandering the Universe
How the heck is Nate Robinson a major subtraction?

Wouldn't he have to actually join the team to be subtracted?


Maybe we could count a 2008 draft pick as a major addition. :doi:



Also agreed on the James Jones oversight.
 

tobiazz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
2,153
Reaction score
4
SirChaz said:
How the heck is Nate Robinson a major subtraction?

Wouldn't he have to actually join the team to be subtracted?


Maybe we could count a 2008 draft pick as a major addition. :doi:



Also agreed on the James Jones oversight.

Well, if Fabricio Oberto is a "major addition," then why not :D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
536,675
Posts
5,259,976
Members
6,275
Latest member
PicksFromDave
Top