Impeachment

Discussion in 'Politics and Religion' started by Ouchie-Z-Clown, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. LoyaltyisaCurse

    LoyaltyisaCurse IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    38,784
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    CA
    8/8!!!
     
    ozzfloyd and Covert Rain like this.
  2. Kel Varnsen

    Kel Varnsen Moderator Contributor

    Age:
    42
    Posts:
    30,459
    Likes Received:
    9,801
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Mature, as always.


     
  3. DemsMyBoys

    DemsMyBoys Registered

    Posts:
    10,609
    Likes Received:
    1,648
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Location:
    Cave Creek
    Our tax dollars are spent on making clown pictures?
     
  4. Russ Smith

    Russ Smith The Original Whizzinator Contributor

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    56,966
    Likes Received:
    4,957
    Joined:
    May 14, 2002
    So it appears the best new story out of this is after Taylor testified behind closed doors a colleague told him that Trump had a direct conversation with Sondland where Trump was in effect checking up on the status of the investigations he demanded.

    Based on this, believe it or not, it sounds like Sondland is now going to be called back, AGAIN, to again clarify his magical memory which didn't tell that story either the first time, or the time he came back with a refreshed memory and clarified. So it sounds like the Dems are going to give Sondland another chance to avoid perjury charges, again, by coming clean about that phone call.

    if true, of course it's huge since it proves Trump was in fact directing this stuff and checking up on it, so he can't just throw Sondland and Rudy under the bus.
     
    DemsMyBoys likes this.
  5. UncleChris

    UncleChris Retirement Doesn't Suck Contributor

    Age:
    68
    Posts:
    19,740
    Likes Received:
    4,165
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    Probably a good time to pile this on top of the turd sundae.....

    https://www.politicususa.com/2019/11/13/trump-breached-security-ukraine-scheme.html
     
    Russ Smith likes this.
  6. Ouchie-Z-Clown

    Ouchie-Z-Clown I'm better than Mulli!

    Age:
    50
    Posts:
    23,795
    Likes Received:
    8,907
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Location:
    SoCal
    I was watching at that point. And it was glorious.
     
    Covert Rain likes this.
  7. Russ Smith

    Russ Smith The Original Whizzinator Contributor

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    56,966
    Likes Received:
    4,957
    Joined:
    May 14, 2002

    And there's Santorum on CNN tonight insisting that the Ukraine situation in no way harmed US international security and if it did, then Obama should be impeached because he never gave Ukraine monetary aid at all. Nevermind that neither did Trump, he had to literally be forced to do it, by the Whistleblower, he was holding it back for political leverage until the report was filed.

    How can they not think Trump using a cellphone like that is not a threat to National Security?

    emails were "lock her up" but Trump refuses to cooperate with security protocols and thinks it's ok?
     
    nashman likes this.
  8. LVG

    LVG Your Friendly Neighborhood P&R Mod Contributor

    Posts:
    19,804
    Likes Received:
    3,394
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Location:
    Vegas, baby, yeah!
    McConnell: The Senate must hold a trial.

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/13/mcconnell-trump-impeachment-articles-trial/

    I was curious about the Majority Leader's position, so I turned to the constitution:

    "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

    Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

    Art. I Sec. 3.

    This is interesting, because there are relatively few constitutional requirements for impeaching a US President. First, the Senate must decide his fate; they can't delegate it. Second, every Senator must take an oath or affirmation when sitting in judgment of an impeachment proceeding. Third, if POTUS is being impeached, then the Chief Justice must preside. Fourth, it takes 2/3rds of the Senate to remove someone from office. And fifth, the Senate's penalties if they choose to impeach are limited.

    And that's it. McConnell appears to be worried about setting bad precedent by allowing a motion to dismiss at the early stages of any removal proceeding. Or he's completely misreading or misunderstanding the Constitution.
     
    Russ Smith likes this.
  9. LVG

    LVG Your Friendly Neighborhood P&R Mod Contributor

    Posts:
    19,804
    Likes Received:
    3,394
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Location:
    Vegas, baby, yeah!
    The GOP is missing the point. Going after the whistleblower is like going after the cape instead of the matador.

    It doesn't matter what the whistleblower said or didn't say - he doesn't have personal knowledge. He's relying on what others told him.

    What matters is what the others-who had personal knowledge-saw and heard.

    Honestly, the GOP's strategy is misplaced here. They should be arguing that yes, all of this is true, 100%, we admit it, but it's not an impeachable offense.

    Which ultimately fails because, of course, it is.
     
    Russ Smith likes this.
  10. LoyaltyisaCurse

    LoyaltyisaCurse IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    38,784
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    CA
     
    Linderbee likes this.
  11. LoyaltyisaCurse

    LoyaltyisaCurse IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    38,784
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    CA
     
    nashman and UncleChris like this.
  12. Western Font

    Western Font Registered

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    611
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2018
    Location:
    via Arizona
    It seems like they are trying to
    dismiss the original complaint as hearsay the way they’ve seen judges dismiss assertions as hearsay on TV. Or that a judge would refuse a “warrant” based on hearsay. I wonder if this is just a strategy or if they believe it applies because they want to believe it.
     
  13. LoyaltyisaCurse

    LoyaltyisaCurse IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    38,784
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    CA
    Strategy...
     
  14. devilalum

    devilalum Heavily Redacted

    Posts:
    16,196
    Likes Received:
    2,832
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2002
    It’s only hearsay because they’re hiding all the people that had first hand participation.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    nashman and Russ Smith like this.
  15. puckhead

    puckhead Waxing Gibbous Contributor

    Posts:
    8,665
    Likes Received:
    3,942
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Location:
    Moment, AZ

    Your last sentence provides the reasoning for the first. They're not missing anything.
     

Share This Page