How are any of those contradictory? Here are the statements I am making: - We need an upgrade or alternative to Edmonds at RB. - I do not envision an upgrade to Edmonds coming from the 5th round or beyond. - There are three backs worthy of a 1st/2nd round pick. They would represent upgrades at the position. - These three backs will likely not be available when we pick in the 2nd. - If they are gone, the remaining backs are probably not worth reaching for compared to other talent on the board and would not be the selection. - This would leave us without acquiring a potential adequate back for the 2021 season, barring a trade, in my opinion. If you believe one of the top 3 will fall to the second round, or that the other RBs ranked behind the top 3 are viable targets with our 2nd pick, then I can understand disinterest in drafting a 1st round RB given our need at CB or other sliding talent. Same with conviction that we'll make a trade that acquires us another mid-round pick.