For What It's Worth In June, Defensive Edition

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,962
Reaction score
3,604
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
My fantasy is Jordan Burch or BJ beat out Zaven.
Doubt it. Zaven is a very good 2-down OLB. Browning subbing in on 3rd round pass rush. Pretty strong duo.

Would of course be fantastic if someone was able to.

But the combined skillset of Collins and Browning is an above average/borderline pro-bowl OLB. I’m skeptical BJ or Burch can make a leap to Collins’ level on 1st and 2nd AND Browning’s level on 3rd.
 
Last edited:

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,677
Reaction score
2,640
Location
ASFN
Doubt it. Zaven is a very good 2-down OLB. Browning subbing in on 3rd round pass rush. Pretty strong duo.

Would of course be fantastic if someone was able to.

But the combined skillset of Collins and Browning is an above average/borderline pro-bowl OLB. I’m skeptical BJ or Burch can make a leap to Collins’ level on 1st and 2nd AND Browning’s level on 3rd.
It’s a fun problem to have
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
40,110
Reaction score
33,701
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Metrics show that it’s where Colins rank as a 2 down backer and where Browning ranks as a pure 3rd down backer.

Would be nice to have that in one player, but here’s it’s spread on two
Grades aren’t metrics.

Get some perspective.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,806
Reaction score
15,751
i will give the coaches and Monti credit for Zaven

99% of the time, a draft pick from the prior FO that didnt meet expectations would be allowed to leave and nobody would care--

but, he has a role the coaches like and Monti signed him to a deal that reflects that role.

Zaven is a useful contributing player that had he been a 3rd round pick, we would all be happy with him
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,962
Reaction score
3,604
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Grades aren’t metrics.

Get some perspective.
Interesting take.

Do you care to explain?

This is a random definition of metrics:
In general, metrics are quantifiable measures used to track and assess performance, progress, or results.

You can disagree all what you want with pff grades but their are based on metrics.

Pff grade OLBs by pass-rush, run defense, tackling and coverage.

Zaven ranks top 5 in run D and tackling and average in coverage. Browning ranked 16th in the league after joining the team. Combine that and you have a good solution.
 
Last edited:

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,583
Reaction score
4,888
Location
The 215
i will give the coaches and Monti credit for Zaven

99% of the time, a draft pick from the prior FO that didnt meet expectations would be allowed to leave and nobody would care--

but, he has a role the coaches like and Monti signed him to a deal that reflects that role.

Zaven is a useful contributing player that had he been a 3rd round pick, we would all be happy with him
I love Zaven. I really do, but I'm going to go out on a limb and demand more from him this year. He's really just been a guy if I'm being honest, and if we weren't so hyper focused on moving off of the old regime, he'd be more of whipping boy for the fan base given his draft position.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
40,110
Reaction score
33,701
Location
Gilbert, AZ
You can disagree all what you want with pff grades but their are based on metrics.
They are not. They are based on grades: human viewers inputting their opinions and then it being processed in various ways.

That’s not a metric.
Zaven ranks top 5 in run D and tackling and average in coverage. Browning ranked 16th in the league after joining the team. Combine that and you have a good solution

It’s not a bad solution but it’s not a borderline pro bowl solution, either.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,962
Reaction score
3,604
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
They are not. They are based on grades: human viewers inputting their opinions and then it being processed in various ways.

That’s not a metric.


It’s not a bad solution but it’s not a borderline pro bowl solution, either.
I disagree because it’s metrics in a model. Sure, there is a human evaluation aspect, but it’s based on a model and that still makes it metrics.

If the word pro-bowl ticks you off that much it’s just semantics. My point was that if you in one player had a top 5 run defender, top 5 tackler, average coverage skills and 16th best pass rusher that would be a player somewhere in the 8-15 range for a position. That is the level below, but not pro-bowl level
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
40,110
Reaction score
33,701
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I disagree because it’s metrics in a model. Sure, there is a human evaluation aspect, but it’s based on a model and that still makes it metrics.

If the word pro-bowl ticks you off that much it’s just semantics. My point was that if you in one player had a top 5 run defender, top 5 tackler, average coverage skills and 16th best pass rusher that would be a player somewhere in the 8-15 range for a position. That is the level below, but not pro-bowl level
Bro it is not. There are no on-field metrics being used in those grades. Look it up where those grades come from. They're even called "grades" or "ratings" which highlight the subjectivity. If a running back makes a three yard run or a seven yard run, it doesn't matter. If the game charter gives the former a +2 and the latter a +1, that does impact the grade/rating.
 

BigDavis75

Making a Comeback
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
4,456
Reaction score
1,678
Location
Amherst, MA
Until we have seen what level Adams has developed to, it’s easily interior O-line IMO

To add to this, our depth is bad/unproven there and Brown is an average starter who probably played to his ceiling last year.
 

Oklahoma Card

Newbie
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Posts
41
Reaction score
85
Location
Oklahoma
I agree interior O-line is a big question mark but this thread is Defensive Edition. What is our biggest need on defense?
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
13,383
Reaction score
30,210
Location
Orlando, FL
Zaven is our best run-defending EDGE so that’s a scary fantasy since I don’t see Burch being that his first year & BJ is too lean.
Burch fascinates me. I don’t think he was well used in college. He flashed all kinds of potential. I’m very excited to see what coaching can do with him. He might even be special with some work.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,962
Reaction score
3,604
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Bro it is not. There are no on-field metrics being used in those grades. Look it up where those grades come from. They're even called "grades" or "ratings" which highlight the subjectivity. If a running back makes a three yard run or a seven yard run, it doesn't matter. If the game charter gives the former a +2 and the latter a +1, that does impact the grade/rating.
No point in argueing when you have painted yourself in a position where actual stats are not the key points of the metrics.

That is just an insane take, sorry
 
Last edited:

BigDavis75

Making a Comeback
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
4,456
Reaction score
1,678
Location
Amherst, MA
I agree interior O-line is a big question mark but this thread is Defensive Edition. What is our biggest need on defense?
Corners lack experience but I have faith and think the unit will be strong by end of year. Off ball LB strikes me as our weakest spot but I think ADG or the Ohio state rookie will be passable in the spot next to Wilson.
 

cardcrazy

Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Posts
894
Reaction score
1,358
Assuming this is correct, I like it! Where would our biggest need(s) be?
On paper this looks great! If this group can stay healthy and perform to expectations I don’t see a glaring need at all. Ojulari, Nolen, Taylor-Demerson, Browning, Starling Thomas, Gaither all backups to this projection.
 
Top