Cards would have taken Sullivan over Suggs at 6..

[EndZone]

What in the world were they thinking over there?

I think Boston left some powder in his locker and the draft team thought...What they hell! It will clear our heads.

 

[Capital Card]

Originally posted by EndZone
What in the world were they thinking over there?

I think Boston left some powder in his locker and the draft team thought...What they hell! It will clear our heads.

Tribune is reporting that Suggs was #16 on their draft board. Sounds like they would have taken a lot of guys at 6 before Terrell.

Go Cards!!!

 

[Krangodnzr]

Re: Re: Cards would have taken Sullivan over Suggs at 6..

Originally posted by Capital Card
Tribune is reporting that Suggs was #16 on their draft board. Sounds like they would have taken a lot of guys at 6 before Terrell.

Go Cards!!!

That is so crazy.

Suggs might be a case of a player that we thought a lot higher of. I was looking at Suggs' stats, and I noticed that he had a lot of sacks against teams that gave up a lot of sacks. Suggs should be a good player, but I'm starting to question if he will be a great player and worthy of a 6th overall

Only time will tell.

 

[JeffGollin]

Regarding Sullivan at #6 and Suggs at #16
So much for "trusting your draft board." It sounds to me that there needs to be major changes in the Cardinal scouting dept.

Who put that board together - George Boone?

 

[Krangodnzr]

Originally posted by JeffGollin
Regarding Sullivan at #6 and Suggs at #16
So much for "trusting your draft board." It sounds to me that there needs to be major changes in the Cardinal scouting dept.

Who put that board together - George Boone?

Well the Saints had a similiar draft board, considering they took Sullivan at #6.