It's laughable to compare us to either of those teams. The Bucs have one of the oldest players in the NFL skewing the average, alongside vet players he brought along for one last run alongside talented youth. The Cardinals have retreads we're hoping to have up years when we have like 3 young talented players.
As for the Chiefs... one of the youngest cores in the league.
That previous data was the year before. Last year the Cards were 26.41. The Bucs were 26.44. Chiefs 26.26.
So what you are saying is that age isn't the problem, it's quality? Which is it?
PS The age difference between Brady and Fitz, both teams oldest players, makes a difference to the average of 0.11 and still puts right next to us.