Bynum is not better than Noah...
Thats crazy...
Bynum gets his 15-20 points off Bryant finding him he has no reliable offense outside his 3-feet range hook shot that isnt very good and his dunks off feeds.
Noah is on the same boat that he isnt an offensive machine either... BUT.... he rebounds like Camby back in his hey days. Provides more energy too.
Shot blocking wise they are about even.
Bynum is longer but Noah is more active and hustles more, not to mention is a more reliable game in and game out player... as Bynum is injury prone.
Bulls DO NEED a veteran coach with success post season to maximise their talent.
Phil Jackson (if he stays) has enough knowledge and adjustment experience to neutralize star players. He has the personnel to do it too....
PG: Rose >>> Fischer (during regular season)
PG: Rose > Fischer (during playoffs, especially critical games)
SG: Bryant >>> Deng (Can Deng even play SG? but he is long and athletic enough)
SF: James >>> Artest (Artest can play good D on slower non physical SFs, but LeBron is as aggressive as they come... Refs will always call to his advantge too, Artest wouldnt be allowed to breath on LeBron when he is attacking the rim)
PF: Gasol > Bosh (Gasol is a better shot blocker and smarter), Gasol > Boozer (better post game and shot blocker), Gasol >/=/< Stoudemire (When Stoudemire attacks and puts effort, the only trait Gasol has over him is being 7 foot and smarter interior player, which pains me a lot because Stoudemire is so close yet so far... sigh)
C: Noah > Bynum (Purely because Bynum is injury prone and Noah's energy is HUGE.)
Bench:
Lakers > Bulls (But thats just theoretically, FAs will flock tom Chicago later on)
Phil Jackson > rookie coach, but might be "=" if Bulls get a succesful coach.