Lawrence and Sweezy to IR

[BritCard]

So both out at least 3 weeks. Not sure what the rules are this year on how many you can designate to return?

 

[BritCard]

Hump also now questionable for Monday

 

[cardcrazy]

Justin Murray in...not a bad thing. He has played well.

 

[Solar7]

You can return as many players as you want this year. IR is a 3 week deal.

 

[BigRedRage]

You can return as many players as you want this year. IR is a 3 week deal.

It should stay this way

Sent from my motorola edge plus using Tapatalk

 

[dscher]

Who cares imo...zero depth will always yield zero results in the long run.

 

[Goldfield]

We have some depth for once

 

[AZman5103]

It should stay this way

Sent from my motorola edge plus using Tapatalk

I completely agree. I have never understood the NFLs rules on the amount of active players, players on the roster, etc. There is a salary cap, if a team wants to put 90 guys on their rosters then let them.

IR should always be something that can be used, players can come back etc. All it does is allow the team to put another body on the field while someone recovers.

 

[BritCard]

I completely agree. I have never understood the NFLs rules on the amount of active players, players on the roster, etc. There is a salary cap, if a team wants to put 90 guys on their rosters then let them.

IR should always be something that can be used, players can come back etc. All it does is allow the team to put another body on the field while someone recovers.

Its apparently to stop teams parking players they want to keep but not on the 53 on IR with spurious injuries. I've always thought it far fetched. Why would a player let that happen rather than be on a PS and have the chance to make a 53 somewhere?

I agree should stay this way.

 

[WisconsinCard]

Its apparently to stop teams parking players they want to keep but not on the 53 on IR with spurious injuries. I've always thought it far fetched. Why would a player let that happen rather than be on a PS and have the chance to make a 53 somewhere?

I agree should stay this way.

Because they're still getting paid. We did it last year with Butler. He wasn't injured bad enough to be out for the year. But they "stashed" him there hoping he would improve. That's is exactly why they do not allow it under normal circumstances.

 

[Chris_Sanders]

Lawrence is a bigger loss than Sweezy. I feel like the depth at offensive line can handle 1-2 losses. Dline though yeesh

 

[Bkbobo]

Lawrence is a bigger loss than Sweezy. I feel like the depth at offensive line can handle 1-2 losses. Dline though yeesh

I agree. I am more concerned having Lawrence out.

 

[GuernseyCard]

D-line: Allen, Blackson, Fotu, Peters, Phillips, and Dogbe and Coley are also available for call up.

 

[Chopper0080]

I agree. I am more concerned having Lawrence out.

I am more concerned playing Haason Reddick significant snaps.

 

[WisconsinCard]

I am more concerned playing Haason Reddick significant snaps.

Especially if he plays on running downs.

 

[Chopper0080]

Especially if he plays on running downs.

Any down where he is not rushing the passer and that is mostly because when rushing the passer he is less likely to give up a huge play.

 

[BritCard]

I am more concerned playing Haason Reddick significant snaps.

I don't think Reddick gets more snaps. The OLB roles are very different. Kennard and Reddick play the strong side and drop into coverage a lot. I don't see VJ moving either of them to the other side because then you just have players both sides out of position. (which means he probably will do it)

I think Allen and Gardeck take snaps on the other side depending on base/nickel and situation.

 

[Cardsmasochist]

D-line: Allen, Blackson, Fotu, Peters, Phillips, and Dogbe and Coley are also available for call up.

I want to see Fotu get more playing time


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk