2019 O-line discussion

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Murray
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
34,280
Reaction score
30,230
Location
Orange County, CA
I think 30 is fair. I don't believe that they are better than that when considering talent and health. If Cole develops, they can be better. If Humphries stays healthy, they can be better. Pugh...the same. Gilbert...the same. Kyler being mobile could make them better. Hell, if Kugler can be a better coach, they can be better.

BUT, you can't ignore all of these "ifs". They are a terrible unit until they show me they are something different.

Lots of ifs dont often workout in the NFL, but when they do, things seem to come together for teams.

This is the road to the Cardinals being good this year, the OL becomes a competent one.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,875
It feels like this topic has been ongoing since I started posting on ASFN over 10 years ago.

At this point....goodness only knows what a good/great/successful offensive line looks like.

One year a line will look good, next year it could be in shambles.

The current situation for the Cardinals is summed up with one word: Injuries

Yes, it can be said for all teams, but history dictates the Cardinals, at least it seems, have a higher than normal risk.

Relative to the Cardinals, I do like the idea that the top 8 linemen are

Humphries
Pugh
Shipley
Sweezy
Gilbert
Harrison
Garcia
Cole

Yes. Of course, I would prefer 8 All-pros, but for what it is, I see this group as an improvement from last year.

I think the smart move with Garcia is to put him on the PUP list for the 1st, ?6 weeks?.

I would allow for the Cardinals to stash two younger players on the final 53, and see what the situation when the PUP time is up.


Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
10,973
Reaction score
11,582
Location
Las Vegas, NV
It feels like this topic has been ongoing since I started posting on ASFN over 10 years ago.

At this point....goodness only knows what a good/great/successful offensive line looks like.

One year a line will look good, next year it could be in shambles.

The current situation for the Cardinals is summed up with one word: Injuries

Yes, it can be said for all teams, but history dictates the Cardinals, at least it seems, have a higher than normal risk.

Relative to the Cardinals, I do like the idea that the top 8 linemen are

Humphries
Pugh
Shipley
Sweezy
Gilbert
Harrison
Garcia
Cole

Yes. Of course, I would prefer 8 All-pros, but for what it is, I see this group as an improvement from last year.

I think the smart move with Garcia is to put him on the PUP list for the 1st, ?6 weeks?.

I would allow for the Cardinals to stash two younger players on the final 53, and see what the situation when the PUP time is up.


Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy

Are we just to the point now where Cole is backup tier only?

Meaning outside of Christian Kirk, last year's draft was essentially pointless and we shouldn't have bothered?
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
7,544
Reaction score
7,254
Location
Home of the Thunder
Feeling a little less optimistic about 2019 after reading the last couple of pages. However, we weren't going to win it all this year in any event.

On offense, the most important goals this year have to be:

1. K2 implementing and refining his scheme.
2. Keeping Murray and DJ healthy.
3. Coaching up the rookie WRs.
4. Determining if any of the current o-line have long-term potential.

Then in 2020, after upgrading the o-line, we come out guns blazing, and take the division back from the Rams.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
9,991
Reaction score
11,401
Location
York, PA
Other than excessive injuries, I believe the greatest component to a great OL is coaching. It remains to be seen if it comes to fruition, but Kugler impresses me. He may be the single biggest O-Line improvement from last year. KM will also make this O-Line look better.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Murray
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
34,280
Reaction score
30,230
Location
Orange County, CA
Feeling a little less optimistic about 2019 after reading the last couple of pages. However, we weren't going to win it all this year in any event.

On offense, the most important goals this year have to be:

1. K2 implementing and refining his scheme.
2. Keeping Murray and DJ healthy.
3. Coaching up the rookie WRs.
4. Determining if any of the current o-line have long-term potential.

Then in 2020, after upgrading the o-line, we come out guns blazing, and take the division back from the Rams.

Look at the Cardinals lines for the 2008, 2009, 2015 seasons. Not great lines.

My issue is that the Cardinals continually fail to identify young OL to develop. Paying free agent guards $8 million as free agents is a great way to screw up your salary cap.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,964
Reaction score
2,507
They are nothing until they show better, as stated previously. Predicting next season's line effectiveness based on last year's struggles is foolish though. There isn't one player who started on the O Line to finish last season that will start this year off.

maybeeee Cole. He's got to face down the injured starter he replaced in Shipley, and Gaillard, who apparently is a raging bull in camp.


HC changed, OC changed, OL coach changed, system changed, QB changed, etc... If they avoid injury, they'll be fine. If not, we have better depth this year anyway. Injuries are a part of every team's season, but in the years that the Cardinals have done exceptionally badly (2012, 2018) they suffered unusual amounts of line injuries, as in all of their starters gone.

I think we'll improve to a middling team this year, and hopefully take the leap next year 2020.
 
Last edited:

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
7,544
Reaction score
7,254
Location
Home of the Thunder
Look at the Cardinals lines for the 2008, 2009, 2015 seasons. Not great lines.

My issue is that the Cardinals continually fail to identify young OL to develop. Paying free agent guards $8 million as free agents is a great way to screw up your salary cap.

Man that line from 2008 is my all time favorite.

LT - Mike "no name" Gandy
LG - Reggie "big butt" Wells
C - Lyle "Rugby hates me" Sendlein
RG - Deuce "Deuce!!" Lutui
RT - Levi "they drafted me instead of AP" Brown

I think they started like 20 straight games together or something crazy like that? That was the key.

Lunch pail, try-hard journeyman, each and every one of them.

But they kept Warner upright enough for him to carve up ATL, CAR and PHI. And I'll be damned if they didn't have us two minutes from a super-bowl victory.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
It's hard to accurately rate any Cardinal player at any position, based on last year's performance because of the pall cast over the entire team by Wilks. He had the entire team trying to fight its way through a dense fog.

Addition by subtraction was never truer.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,875
maybeeee Cole. He's got to face down the injured started he replaced in Shipley, and Gaillard.

I agree, to be a starter, Cole has to out compete those two. As for depth, Mason Cole is going to have a roster spot, and be on the active 45.

His value is he can play anywhere on the line, and has proven reliability, both in skill and availability.



Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,875
Are we just to the point now where Cole is backup tier only?

Meaning outside of Christian Kirk, last year's draft was essentially pointless and we shouldn't have bothered?
Cunningham, Cole, and Edmonds seem to have some value.

The complete debacle of the Rosen situation has been well documented and debated to death and dust.

If Cunningham can stick, and Cole is the utility man he has been touted as, its not THAT bad. There have been far worse drafts as of late.

Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
10,973
Reaction score
11,582
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Cunningham, Cole, and Edmonds seem to have some value.

The complete debacle of the Rosen situation has been well documented and debated to death and dust.

If Cunningham can stick, and Cole is the utility man he has been touted as, its not THAT bad. There have been far worse drafts as of late.

Sent from my mystical communication warp drive device thingy
You don't win in the NFL by plucking one singular starter in the draft from a year ago on the worst team in the league.

Especially not when you needed to draft three guys at his position the next year anyways.

If Cole doesn't start this year, Keim should be fired. I mean, he already should have. I'm in a bad mood today, but man, the levels of ineptitude to blow this many drafts in a row...
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,001
Reaction score
4,860
Location
Scarsdale, NY
SK bounced back big time with this year's draft. Granted, we had the #1 pick, and that got us the best player in the Draft. We, in time, will end up with the following draftees who will contribute:
1.Murray
2.Murphy
3.Isabella
4.Allen
Plus, I have hopes that a couple more will make it. Probably, two or three more.

"Happy Days Are Here Again!"
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
37,913
Reaction score
20,498
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
SK bounced back big time with this year's draft. Granted, we had the #1 pick, and that got us the best player in the Draft. We, in time, will end up with the following draftees who will contribute:
1.Murray
2.Murphy
3.Isabella
4.Allen
Plus, I have hopes that a couple more will make it. Probably, two or three more.

"Happy Days Are Here Again!"

We hope and pray, but cannot know.
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

…..
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
132,135
Reaction score
52,157
Location
Las Cruces, New Mexico
Johnny Kinsley (@Brickwallblitz)
9/19/19, 4:06 PM
Pressures Allowed Per Dropback Through Wk 2:

SF: .07
DAL: .13
NE: .15
KC, NYG, PIT: .18
BAL, CIN, OAK, PHI: .21
CAR: .22
DEN, WAS: .23
IND: .25
ARI, ATL, NYJ: .26
CLE, JAX, NO: .29
BUF, LAR: .30
SEA: .31
DET: .32
CHI, GB: .33
LAC: .36
TB: .39
TEN: .43
HOU: .48
MIN: .49
MIA: .52
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

…..
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
132,135
Reaction score
52,157
Location
Las Cruces, New Mexico
Johnny Kinsley (@Brickwallblitz)
9/19/19, 4:08 PM
For context here's Team Dropbacks through Week 2:

ARI: 103
CIN: 100
ATL: 96
CAR, NYG: 95
PHI: 90
DEN, MIA, PIT: 83
BUF, CLE: 82
WAS: 81
NO: 80
KC: 79
CHI, DET: 78
JAX, NYJ: 77
LAC: 74
GB, HOU, LAR: 73
BAL: 72
OAK, TB: 70
NE: 67
IND, SEA: 64
DAL, TEN: 63
SF: 54
MIN: 47
 

Chris_Sanders

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
37,611
Reaction score
26,247
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I said it from the beginning, Kingsbury's system has had exactly one guy drafted from the oline and it was like the 7th round. Despite that, he routinely was tops in the country in offense despite being at a huge recruiting disadvantage.

This alone is why his system is the future of the NFL. Being in the shotgun most of the time mitigates a bad line.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,964
Reaction score
2,507
However, it also eliminates large portions of your running game. Not nearly as many options for handoffs when you're starting five yards deep.
 

Chris_Sanders

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
37,611
Reaction score
26,247
Location
Scottsdale, Az
However, it also eliminates large portions of your running game. Not nearly as many options for handoffs when you're starting five yards deep.

I am not sure that is true. We ran the ball fine week 1
 
  • Like
Reactions: HGC

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
3,649
Reaction score
2,969
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Johnny Kinsley (@Brickwallblitz)
9/19/19, 4:08 PM
For context here's Team Dropbacks through Week 2:

ARI: 103
CIN: 100
ATL: 96
CAR, NYG: 95
PHI: 90
DEN, MIA, PIT: 83
BUF, CLE: 82
WAS: 81
NO: 80
KC: 79
CHI, DET: 78
JAX, NYJ: 77
LAC: 74
GB, HOU, LAR: 73
BAL: 72
OAK, TB: 70
NE: 67
IND, SEA: 64
DAL, TEN: 63
SF: 54
MIN: 47

Certainly paints a different picture than the crap thrown on the wall, facts suck...
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Murray
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
34,280
Reaction score
30,230
Location
Orange County, CA
Max Starks had some good insight into what he thinks is wrong with DJ.

He said that DJ is likely playing tentatively because every snap hes looking at the blocking scheme and wondering how the line in front of him is going to win and what he is going to have to do to make the play successful.

The lack of 11 personnel is killing the offense from a run game perspective.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,528
Reaction score
25,985
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Max Starks had some good insight into what he thinks is wrong with DJ.

He said that DJ is likely playing tentatively because every snap hes looking at the blocking scheme and wondering how the line in front of him is going to win and what he is going to have to do to make the play successful.

The lack of 11 personnel is killing the offense from a run game perspective.

So a tight end would make the difference for David Johnson? That doesn't make much sense to me.

When the offense goes 4WR, we should still have a numbers advantage on one side of the center or the other. You can pull a guard and then have 4 OL on one side of the center.

Even when you're balanced, the read option is supposed to freeze the outside defender and ensure that you have a numbers advantage on that side.

I just don't think we're doing a good enough job of getting DJ into open space in the run game. We're not running up the back of the center anymore (Thank goodness), but the memories I have of DJ at his best was a lot of off-tackle stuff where he planted his foot and accelerated.

Here's his rush chart from last week. These zone-read runs force him to the inside most of the time.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
534,877
Posts
5,247,060
Members
6,274
Latest member
G-PA
Top