Draft Week Cardinal Rumors

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,876
Reaction score
51,178
Location
SoCal
Gambo 5 update ( assumes big 2 CBs and 3 WRs are gone)

Zaven Collins, LB Tulsa
Kwity Paye, Edge, Mich
AVT, G/T, USC
Trevon Moehring, S, TCU

last one in about 15 mins

he also says trade down odds > 50% ( this is worthless)
Moehring?wondered what the team thought of Thompsons.

If one of the Thompsons doesn’t start does that mean that the cardinals will not start a single player on either side of the ball that wasn’t either a 1st or 2nd round pick or free agent signing? That really shows how bad Keim’s later draft picks have been. Not a single diamond in the rough that became a keeper for this team.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
59,876
Reaction score
51,178
Location
SoCal
his co host Dave Burns reacted to that with......."that would be...underwhelming"

final name:

Najee Harris, RB Alabama
That entire 5 is underwhelming.

zaven - okay. Seems like a later first round pick. Is he inside or outside linebacker?
Paye - not an exciting pass rusher and question the fit.
AVT - I’m good with oline, but I’m concerned he’s just not tough enough. not dominant, even at guard )which would be okay with me if he was).
Moehring - have admit I didn’t see safety on our radar so haven’t seen much of him. But I don’t see people talking him up as a ballhawk and that’s what this secondary is missing.
Najee - I like najee. I like him more in the 20s with another 2nd and/or 3rd+.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
11,761
Reaction score
9,352
Gambo also says if he had to guess Harris is the pick.

if that 5 is accurate I am praying for a trade down.
 

Hoodhero

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
2,958
Location
Canada
Cards better have Nelson waiting to sign after draft. Been forced into drafting cb to start in a win now year for organization is unacceptable. I don't think any of these rookies doing anything to stop a Lockette, Metcalf etc
 

Cardsfaninlouky

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
4,424
Reaction score
5,819
Location
Louisville
Rumors are heating up that the Cardinals really want Waddle. We have such little draft capital I just don't see a trade happening. With no 3-5 round picks a trade for Waddle would cost us future picks which would put us in an even bigger hole building this team. Hicks needs to be replaced probably after the 2021 season, CJ is getting older & so is Watt & we really need a #1 CB. Our 2 CB's are only signed for next season. I know the cap will go back up in 2022 but with the age of key players on our defense, giving up draft capital will put us in a hole trying to replace them. Yes, I would love to draft Waddle but not at the expense of basically putting him on a credit card to pay off later. WR has been a deep position in the draft at least the last 2-3 years so there will be one to draft in 2022. I think we need to draft a #1 CB at 16 but who will be there actually. Farley has so many red flags with injuries & I believe Horn will be gone by 16 & Surtain definitely will be. Collins would be a good pick though imo, he can replace Hicks after next season & would be a good piece to add with Simmons at LB. Not sure how I feel about Newsome at CB? I've heard good things & bad things but he seems to be moving up the draft boards so what do I know lol?
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,672
Reaction score
9,384
Location
milan-italy
Cards better have Nelson waiting to sign after draft. Been forced into drafting cb to start in a win now year for organization is unacceptable. I don't think any of these rookies doing anything to stop a Lockette, Metcalf etc

At least for a, rookie u have the benefit of the doubt
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,002
Reaction score
14,417
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Rumors are heating up that the Cardinals really want Waddle. We have such little draft capital I just don't see a trade happening. With no 3-5 round picks a trade for Waddle would cost us future picks which would put us in an even bigger hole building this team. Hicks needs to be replaced probably after the 2021 season, CJ is getting older & so is Watt & we really need a #1 CB. Our 2 CB's are only signed for next season. I know the cap will go back up in 2022 but with the age of key players on our defense, giving up draft capital will put us in a hole trying to replace them. Yes, I would love to draft Waddle but not at the expense of basically putting him on a credit card to pay off later. WR has been a deep position in the draft at least the last 2-3 years so there will be one to draft in 2022. I think we need to draft a #1 CB at 16 but who will be there actually. Farley has so many red flags with injuries & I believe Horn will be gone by 16 & Surtain definitely will be. Collins would be a good pick though imo, he can replace Hicks after next season & would be a good piece to add with Simmons at LB. Not sure how I feel about Newsome at CB? I've heard good things & bad things but he seems to be moving up the draft boards so what do I know lol?
I don’t think Keim is thinking about 2022. The seat he is on is getting hotter. I think we will draft two player that will have an immediate impact. That screams rb and Wr. If we could trade down 5 or 10 spots and in doing so pick up a 2nd round we could end up with a Wr like Toney, a rb like Williams and a cb like Stokes. I think most of us would be okay with this.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,416
Reaction score
7,049
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
I heard the rationale for Moehring was that it would allow Baker to play more in the box with Moehring as the over the top ball hawk. But I too think the whole proposition sounds unlikely and underwhelming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
12,357
Reaction score
21,037
I really can’t believe Keim is that much of a jackass(I can) to actually draft another off ball LB lol like how you can be so damn ignorant
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,912
Reaction score
5,024
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Not crazy about taking a safety with our #16th pick. It currently is a position of strength and we have way too many other needs. Additionally, I feel there will be better players available when we pick.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
10,973
Reaction score
11,581
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Screams Keim 2nd rounder

"We thought he was the best corner, but we liked our first-round pick better"
"I was just amazed he fell this far"
"Our doctors cleared him, we feel comfortable"
"Here, I brought out our doctor to answer some questions"
You must be registered for see images attach


If it happens, I won't be upset, but pray that his back is structurally ok and any 'additional' surgery is somehow, someway, a minor cleanup. (or it's just disinfo to get the guy to slide)
hi dr nick
 

Cardsfaninlouky

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
4,424
Reaction score
5,819
Location
Louisville
I don’t think Keim is thinking about 2022. The seat he is on is getting hotter. I think we will draft two player that will have an immediate impact. That screams rb and Wr. If we could trade down 5 or 10 spots and in doing so pick up a 2nd round we could end up with a Wr like Toney, a rb like Williams and a cb like Stokes. I think most of us would be okay with this.
I would be "Stoked" with those choices lol.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,195
Reaction score
3,723
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Wow. What is their plan?

Did they legit trade all those picks for #3 just to try to get Rodgers, knowing that the fallback plan is to draft the 3rd-5th best QB as the 3rd QB taken in the draft?

One where it's been rumored one side wants Jones and the other wants Lance? Thus they didn't even know what QB they wanted if Rodgers couldn't be had?

This is a big boy move to make especially without a solid plan. I get they could of said if we can't get Rodgers we're fine with a choice between Jones/Lance/etc, but that seems really dangerous to stake so much on a pool of players instead of one you are laser focused on.

Of course, these are all rumors and might be completely false all around and the Niners get the exact QB they made the trade for.
 

Cardsfan77

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 1, 2015
Posts
1,141
Reaction score
1,437
Wow. What is their plan?

Did they legit trade all those picks for #3 just to try to get Rodgers, knowing that the fallback plan is to draft the 3rd-5th best QB as the 3rd QB taken in the draft?

One where it's been rumored one side wants Jones and the other wants Lance? Thus they didn't even know what QB they wanted if Rodgers couldn't be had?

This is a big boy move to make especially without a solid plan. I get they could of said if we can't get Rodgers we're fine with a choice between Jones/Lance/etc, but that seems really dangerous to stake so much on a pool of players instead of one you are laser focused on.

Of course, these are all rumors and might be completely false all around and the Niners get the exact QB they made the trade for.
I think they’ve known exactly which QB they’ve wanted the whole time and are just having some fun with the process...
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,672
Reaction score
9,384
Location
milan-italy
Rumors are heating up that the Cardinals really want Waddle. We have such little draft capital I just don't see a trade happening. With no 3-5 round picks a trade for Waddle would cost us future picks which would put us in an even bigger hole building this team. Hicks needs to be replaced probably after the 2021 season, CJ is getting older & so is Watt & we really need a #1 CB. Our 2 CB's are only signed for next season. I know the cap will go back up in 2022 but with the age of key players on our defense, giving up draft capital will put us in a hole trying to replace them. Yes, I would love to draft Waddle but not at the expense of basically putting him on a credit card to pay off later. WR has been a deep position in the draft at least the last 2-3 years so there will be one to draft in 2022. I think we need to draft a #1 CB at 16 but who will be there actually. Farley has so many
I’m sorry but that’s hilarious if true, doesn’t hurt to try though I guess lol
Wow. What is their plan?

Did they legit trade all those picks for #3 just to try to get Rodgers, knowing that the fallback plan is to draft the 3rd-5th best QB as the 3rd QB taken in the draft?

One where it's been rumored one side wants Jones and the other wants Lance? Thus they didn't even know what QB they wanted if Rodgers couldn't be had?

This is a big boy move to make especially without a solid plan. I get they could of said if we can't get Rodgers we're fine with a choice between Jones/Lance/etc, but that seems really dangerous to stake so much on a pool of players instead of one you are laser focused on.

Of course, these are all rumors and might be completely false all around and the Niners get the exact QB they made the trade for.

Maybe they just regret about the trade they made, getting more info on the other qb's available raised some doubts in their minds
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
534,771
Posts
5,246,089
Members
6,273
Latest member
sarahmoose
Top